Skip to content
Ice Lab

Sat, Dec 28, 2013·Scottrade Center, St. Louis

Chicago Blackhawks 5, St. Louis Blues 6 (SO)

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, St. Louis Blues win this game 60% of the time.

STL winsCHI wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3OTSOTotal
CHI3131916042532
STL1621226013625

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 7:48CHIPatrick SharpAssists: Marian Hossa, Jonathan Toews · Backhand, 0.10 xG1–0
  2. P1 9:55CHIAndrew ShawPPAssists: Patrick Kane, Duncan Keith · Tip-in, 0.18 xG2–0
  3. P1 14:04STLMaxim LapierreAssists: Carlo Colaiacovo, Ian Cole · Deflected, 0.11 xG2–1
  4. P1 17:04CHIPatrick KaneAssists: Duncan Keith, Jonathan Toews · Wrist, 0.03 xG3–1
  5. P2 2:46STLJaden SchwartzAssists: Vladimir Tarasenko, Patrik Berglund · Wrist, 0.09 xG3–2
  6. P2 7:47STLDmitrij JaskinAssists: Jay Bouwmeester, Chris Porter · Wrist, 0.08 xG3–3
  7. P2 17:46CHIBrandon SaadAssists: Ben Smith, Marcus Kruger · Wrist, 0.13 xG4–3
  8. P3 1:06CHIBrent SeabrookAssists: Patrick Kane · Wrist, 0.02 xG5–3
  9. P3 16:09STLVladimir TarasenkoAssists: Alex Pietrangelo, Ian Cole · Wrist, 0.07 xG5–4
  10. P3 17:26STLPatrik BerglundPPAssists: Vladimir Tarasenko, Kevin Shattenkirk · Backhand, 0.10 xG5–5

Shootout

  1. 1. STL T.J. Oshie scored
  2. 2. CHI Jonathan Toews scored
  3. 3. STL Vladimir Tarasenko scored
  4. 4. CHI Patrick Sharp scored
  5. 5. STL Chris Stewart stopped
  6. 6. CHI Patrick Kane stopped
  7. 7. STL Jaden Schwartz stopped
  8. 8. CHI Marian Hossa stopped
  9. 9. STL Kevin Shattenkirk scored
  10. 10. CHI Brandon Saad stopped
Penalties (5)
  1. P1 8:50STLVladimir Tarasenko: Tripping2 min · PPG
  2. P1 14:26CHIMichal Handzus: Hooking2 min
  3. P1 17:32CHIAndrew Shaw: Tripping2 min
  4. P2 10:21CHIPatrick Sharp: Tripping2 min
  5. P3 16:52CHINiklas Hjalmarsson: Holding2 min · PPG

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

CHI00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0STL
48% to win52% to win
← CHI attackSTL attack →
  1. P1 20:00Toews won the faceoff against Backes
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

CHISTL
32Shots on goal25
2.1Expected goals2.7
53Shot attempts61
34Faceoffs won26
1Power plays4
8Penalty minutes2
12Hits30
18Blocked shots12
4Giveaways2
1Takeaways8

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Chicago Blackhawks

Forward lines

  1. bestHossa – Sharp – Toews13:27

    xG 0.60–0.37 (62%)attempts 16–12goals 1–0

  2. Smith – Kruger – Bollig8:20

    xG 0.05–0.26 (15%)attempts 2–7goals 0–1

  3. Bickell – Shaw – Saad7:49

    xG 0.22–0.46 (32%)attempts 7–8goals 0–1

  4. Handzus – Versteeg – Kane12:23

    xG 0.36–0.60 (37%)attempts 9–17goals 1–1

Defence pairs

  1. bestKeith – Hjalmarsson2:31

    xG 0.06–0.00 (100%)attempts 1–0goals 0–0

  2. Brookbank – Leddy9:43

    xG 0.22–0.38 (37%)attempts 8–8goals 1–1

  3. Keith – Seabrook17:02

    xG 0.59–1.02 (37%)attempts 15–27goals 1–2

St. Louis Blues

Forward lines

  1. bestBerglund – Paajarvi – Tarasenko9:57

    xG 0.60–0.21 (74%)attempts 16–7goals 1–1

  2. Morrow – Lapierre – Stewart10:50

    xG 0.30–0.12 (72%)attempts 8–5goals 1–0

  3. Backes – Oshie – Schwartz14:09

    xG 0.54–0.44 (55%)attempts 16–9goals 0–1

  4. Porter – Cracknell – Jaskin4:53

    xG 0.14–0.28 (33%)attempts 4–7goals 1–1

Defence pairs

  1. bestColaiacovo – Cole9:44

    xG 0.59–0.30 (66%)attempts 11–9goals 1–1

  2. Bouwmeester – Pietrangelo20:16

    xG 0.88–0.60 (59%)attempts 21–16goals 1–1

  3. Jackman – Shattenkirk14:23

    xG 0.56–0.29 (66%)attempts 13–11goals 1–1

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

STL 2.7 xGCHI 2.1 xG
-0.500.511.522.53P1P2P3OTEndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

STLCHI

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

STL's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line STL is favoured, below it CHI. Dots are goals.

Excitement 98/100 · #16 of 1230 this seasonSwing 2.55 · 10 goals in reach · 2-goal lead cutComeback index 2% (winner's lowest chance)
CHI 100%5050%50STL 100%P1P2P3OTEndBiggest swing +36 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, St. Louis Blues win this game 60% of the time.

STL winsCHI wins

Simulated goal difference (STL − CHI), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).