Sun, Dec 29, 2013·Scotiabank Saddledome, Calgary
Vancouver Canucks 2, Calgary Flames 0
Expected result
Based on shot quality alone, Vancouver Canucks win this game 82% of the time.
By period
Goals and shots on goal in each period.
| Team | P1 | P2 | P3 | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| VAN | 113 | 011 | 16 | 230 |
| CGY | 02 | 06 | 010 | 018 |
Goals, with shots on goal in grey.
Scoring
Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.
- P1 19:20VANJannik HansenGWGAssists: Henrik Sedin, Dan Hamhuis · Wrist, 0.06 xG1–0
- P3 17:44VANMike SantorelliAssists: Ryan Kesler · Wrist, 0.11 xG2–0
Penalties (5)
- P1 2:43CGYBrian McGrattan: Elbowing5 min
- P1 2:43CGYBrian McGrattan: Fighting5 min
- P1 2:43VANTom Sestito: Fighting5 min
- P1 2:43CGYBrian McGrattan: Game misconduct10 min
- P2 16:55VANZac Dalpe: Holding the stick2 min
Replay
Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.
20:00
P1
- P1 20:00Stajan won the faceoff against Kesler
- Goal
- Shot
- Miss
- Block
- Hit
- Takeaway
- Giveaway
- Faceoff
- Penalty
The numbers
Team totals, side by side.
Line combinations that worked
Model-basedEach team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.
Vancouver Canucks
Forward lines
- bestSedin – Sedin – Hansen13:08
xG 1.12–0.68 (62%)attempts 13–12goals 1–0
- Higgins – Kesler – Santorelli15:11
xG 0.47–0.07 (87%)attempts 12–6goals 1–0
- Sestito – Dalpe – Weise5:22
xG 0.23–0.11 (69%)attempts 4–4goals 0–0
- Richardson – Booth – Kassian9:40
xG 0.28–0.22 (56%)attempts 8–8goals 0–0
Defence pairs
- bestGarrison – Tanev6:14
xG 0.50–0.04 (93%)attempts 7–3goals 0–0
- Bieksa – Garrison10:49
xG 0.51–0.36 (59%)attempts 8–8goals 1–0
- Hamhuis – Tanev12:20
xG 0.53–0.38 (58%)attempts 9–9goals 0–0
Calgary Flames
Forward lines
- bestStajan – Stempniak – Galiardi5:59
xG 0.13–0.06 (69%)attempts 3–2goals 0–0
- Hudler – Jones – Monahan4:11
xG 0.05–0.07 (42%)attempts 2–2goals 0–0
- Cammalleri – Hudler – Monahan3:20
xG 0.01–0.03 (28%)attempts 3–2goals 0–0
- Cammalleri – Byron – Backlund5:46
xG 0.34–0.48 (42%)attempts 6–7goals 0–0
Defence pairs
- bestButler – Brodie14:29
xG 0.61–0.38 (61%)attempts 13–8goals 0–0
- Smid – Butler4:26
xG 0.12–0.08 (62%)attempts 2–4goals 0–0
- Giordano – Brodie2:20
xG 0.02–0.00 (100%)attempts 2–0goals 0–0
How the game flowed
Model-basedChance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.
Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.
Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute
Win probability
Model-basedHow each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.
CGY's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line CGY is favoured, below it VAN. Dots are goals.
Did the better team win?
Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.
Based on shot quality alone, Vancouver Canucks win this game 82% of the time.
Simulated goal difference (CGY − VAN), 10,000 replays
The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).