Skip to content
Ice Lab

Tue, Jan 14, 2014·First Niagara Center, Buffalo

Philadelphia Flyers 4, Buffalo Sabres 3

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Philadelphia Flyers win this game 68% of the time.

BUF winsPHI wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
PHI06112315433
BUF150727319

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 6:59BUFCody HodgsonAssists: Steve Ott, Matt D'Agostini · Wrist, 0.12 xG0–1
  2. P2 1:40PHIJakub VoracekPPAssists: Wayne Simmonds, Scott Hartnell · Snap, 0.09 xG1–1
  3. P3 6:27BUFMatt D'AgostiniAssists: Steve Ott, Cody Hodgson · Tip-in, 0.10 xG1–2
  4. P3 13:28PHIBrayden SchennAssists: Scott Hartnell, Andrej Meszaros · Wrist, 0.10 xG2–2
  5. P3 15:53PHIScott HartnellPPAssists: Wayne Simmonds, Claude Giroux · Slap, 0.12 xG3–2
  6. P3 16:47BUFTyler EnnisAssists: Matt Moulson, Christian Ehrhoff · Wrist, 0.08 xG3–3
  7. P3 19:45PHIVincent LecavalierGWGAssists: Matt Read, Sean Couturier · Wrist, 0.02 xG4–3
Penalties (10)
  1. P1 3:19BUFMark Pysyk: Tripping2 min
  2. P1 8:28PHIAndrej Meszaros: Hooking2 min
  3. P1 14:22BUFAlexander Sulzer: Cross checking2 min
  4. P2 0:39BUFZenon Konopka: Holding2 min · PPG
  5. P2 3:12PHIJay Rosehill: Interference2 min
  6. P2 7:02PHINicklas Grossmann: Interference2 min
  7. P2 11:47BUFBrayden McNabb: Roughing2 min
  8. P2 14:01PHIAdam Hall: Hooking2 min
  9. P3 2:31BUFBrian Flynn: Hooking2 min
  10. P3 15:06BUFZenon Konopka: Interference goalkeeper2 min · PPG

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

PHI00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0BUF
48% to win52% to win
← PHI attackBUF attack →
  1. P1 20:00Hodgson won the faceoff against Schenn
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

PHIBUF
33Shots on goal19
2.8Expected goals1.8
61Shot attempts36
33Faceoffs won36
6Power plays4
8Penalty minutes12
8Hits26
8Blocked shots16
4Giveaways6
3Takeaways2

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Philadelphia Flyers

Forward lines

  1. bestGiroux – Voracek – Raffl9:57

    xG 0.46–0.16 (74%)attempts 15–3goals 0–0

  2. Hartnell – Simmonds – Schenn9:38

    xG 0.51–0.26 (66%)attempts 11–7goals 1–1

  3. Lecavalier – Read – Couturier8:06

    xG 0.26–0.08 (76%)attempts 7–2goals 1–0

  4. Hall – Rosehill – VandeVelde2:18

    xG 0.00–0.00attempts 0–1goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestTimonen – Coburn8:45

    xG 0.42–0.16 (72%)attempts 12–4goals 1–1

  2. Streit – Grossmann11:10

    xG 0.56–0.56 (50%)attempts 11–10goals 0–1

  3. Meszaros – Schenn11:04

    xG 0.14–0.20 (41%)attempts 11–7goals 0–1

Buffalo Sabres

Forward lines

  1. bestOtt – D'Agostini – Hodgson8:28

    xG 0.55–0.44 (55%)attempts 9–9goals 2–1

  2. Konopka – Ellis – Foligno5:20

    xG 0.08–0.03 (76%)attempts 3–4goals 0–0

  3. Moulson – Omark – Ennis2:01

    xG 0.10–0.08 (53%)attempts 3–4goals 1–0

  4. Moulson – Ennis – Girgensons8:58

    xG 0.42–0.46 (47%)attempts 7–10goals 0–1

Defence pairs

  1. bestMcBain – McNabb12:23

    xG 0.47–0.24 (67%)attempts 10–12goals 1–0

  2. Ehrhoff – Pysyk12:13

    xG 0.56–0.47 (54%)attempts 8–14goals 2–1

  3. Sulzer – Weber13:01

    xG 0.16–0.65 (19%)attempts 8–18goals 0–1

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

BUF 1.8 xGPHI 2.8 xG
-0.500.511.522.53P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

BUFPHI

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

BUF's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line BUF is favoured, below it PHI. Dots are goals.

Excitement 93/100 · #65 of 1230 this seasonSwing 2.63 · 7 goals in reachComeback index 15% (winner's lowest chance)
PHI 100%5050%50BUF 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +46 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Philadelphia Flyers win this game 68% of the time.

BUF winsPHI wins

Simulated goal difference (BUF − PHI), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).