Skip to content
Ice Lab

Wed, Jan 22, 2014·Joe Louis Arena, Detroit

Chicago Blackhawks 4, Detroit Red Wings 5 (SO)

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Detroit Red Wings win this game 68% of the time.

DET winsCHI wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3OTSOTotal
CHI21111019052435
DET21221106023531

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 8:41CHIMarian HossaAssists: Jonathan Toews, Johnny Oduya · Tip-in, 0.12 xG1–0
  2. P1 10:26CHIAndrew ShawAssists: Patrick Kane, Brandon Saad · Backhand, 0.25 xG2–0
  3. P1 11:14DETTomas TatarAssists: Brendan Smith, Tomas Jurco · Wrist, 0.40 xG2–1
  4. P1 17:40DETPatrick EavesAssists: Justin Abdelkader, Henrik Zetterberg · Wrist, 0.04 xG2–2
  5. P2 5:03CHIPatrick SharpPPAssists: Duncan Keith, Patrick Kane · Slap, 0.04 xG3–2
  6. P2 6:20DETKyle QuinceyAssists: Gustav Nyquist, Henrik Zetterberg · Snap, 0.07 xG3–3
  7. P2 11:14DETGustav NyquistAssists: Henrik Zetterberg, Justin Abdelkader · Wrist, 0.20 xG3–4
  8. P3 5:12CHIMarcus KrugerUnassisted · Wrist, 0.06 xG4–4

Shootout

  1. 1. DET Tomas Tatar stopped
  2. 2. CHI Jonathan Toews scored
  3. 3. DET Patrick Eaves scored
  4. 4. CHI Patrick Sharp scored
  5. 5. DET Todd Bertuzzi scored
  6. 6. CHI Patrick Kane stopped
  7. 7. DET Henrik Zetterberg stopped
  8. 8. CHI Marian Hossa stopped
  9. 9. DET Tomas Jurco stopped
  10. 10. CHI Marcus Kruger stopped
  11. 11. DET Darren Helm scored
  12. 12. CHI Andrew Shaw stopped
Penalties (8)
  1. P2 4:57DETDrew Miller: Interference2 min · PPG
  2. P2 16:28CHIBrandon Saad: Hooking2 min
  3. P2 16:28CHIBrandon Saad: Slashing2 min
  4. P2 19:10DETDaniel Cleary: Interference2 min
  5. P3 2:30DETKyle Quincey: Tripping2 min
  6. P3 5:22DETDanny DeKeyser: Interference2 min
  7. P3 7:03CHIMarian Hossa: Cross checking2 min
  8. P3 14:53CHIDuncan Keith: Interference2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

CHI00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0DET
48% to win52% to win
← CHI attackDET attack →
  1. P1 20:00Toews won the faceoff against Zetterberg
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

CHIDET
35Shots on goal31
2.5Expected goals3.7
52Shot attempts61
44Faceoffs won24
4Power plays4
8Penalty minutes8
16Hits31
13Blocked shots9
5Giveaways10
7Takeaways13

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Chicago Blackhawks

Forward lines

  1. bestKane – Shaw – Saad12:06

    xG 0.76–0.19 (80%)attempts 10–7goals 1–0

  2. Handzus – Bickell – Versteeg6:58

    xG 0.24–0.22 (52%)attempts 10–6goals 0–1

  3. Hossa – Sharp – Toews11:57

    xG 0.44–1.01 (30%)attempts 12–11goals 0–1

  4. Smith – Kruger – Bollig9:01

    xG 0.06–0.65 (8%)attempts 1–9goals 1–1

Defence pairs

  1. bestKostka – Leddy12:59

    xG 0.75–0.12 (86%)attempts 12–8goals 1–0

  2. Keith – Seabrook14:46

    xG 0.61–0.72 (46%)attempts 16–12goals 0–1

  3. Oduya – Hjalmarsson14:43

    xG 0.25–1.36 (16%)attempts 7–21goals 2–3

Detroit Red Wings

Forward lines

  1. bestTatar – Sheahan – Jurco10:16

    xG 0.64–0.02 (96%)attempts 12–2goals 1–0

  2. Zetterberg – Abdelkader – Nyquist11:33

    xG 0.72–0.43 (62%)attempts 10–12goals 2–0

  3. Eaves – Miller – Glendening12:14

    xG 0.26–0.10 (73%)attempts 6–3goals 0–0

  4. Bertuzzi – Cleary – Helm6:18

    xG 0.28–0.73 (28%)attempts 7–12goals 0–3

Defence pairs

  1. bestKronwall – Ericsson12:48

    xG 0.87–0.50 (64%)attempts 15–14goals 1–0

  2. Smith – Lashoff13:34

    xG 0.62–0.25 (71%)attempts 11–8goals 1–1

  3. Ericsson – DeKeyser2:02

    xG 0.37–0.06 (86%)attempts 3–1goals 0–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

DET 3.7 xGCHI 2.5 xG
01234P1P2P3OTEndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

DETCHI

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

DET's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line DET is favoured, below it CHI. Dots are goals.

Excitement 95/100 · #46 of 1230 this seasonSwing 2.51 · 8 goals in reach · 2-goal lead cutComeback index 22% (winner's lowest chance)
CHI 100%5050%50DET 100%P1P2P3OTEndBiggest swing +29 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Detroit Red Wings win this game 68% of the time.

DET winsCHI wins

Simulated goal difference (DET − CHI), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).