Sat, Jan 25, 2014·SAP Center at San Jose, San Jose
Minnesota Wild 2, San Jose Sharks 3 (OT)
Expected result
Based on shot quality alone, San Jose Sharks win this game 67% of the time.
By period
Goals and shots on goal in each period.
| Team | P1 | P2 | P3 | OT | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MIN | 17 | 19 | 04 | 02 | 222 |
| SJS | 011 | 210 | 07 | 14 | 332 |
Goals, with shots on goal in grey.
Scoring
Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.
- P1 9:33MINMatt CookeUnassisted · Wrist, 0.13 xG1–0
- P2 4:16MINKeith BallardAssists: Mikael Granlund, Jason Pominville · Wrist, 0.08 xG2–0
- P2 11:12SJSJoe ThorntonAssists: Joe Pavelski, Matt Irwin · Wrist, 0.04 xG2–1
- P2 12:01SJSPatrick MarleauAssists: Tommy Wingels, Matt Irwin · Wrist, 0.10 xG2–2
- OT 3:30SJSJoe ThorntonGWGAssists: Joe Pavelski · Snap, 0.03 xG2–3
Penalties (6)
- P1 17:03MINClayton Stoner: Fighting5 min
- P1 17:03SJSMike Brown: Fighting5 min
- P2 5:35SJSMatt Irwin: Hooking2 min
- P3 1:57MINClayton Stoner: Slashing2 min
- P3 5:26MINNate Prosser: Hooking2 min
- P3 5:30SJSJason Demers: Interference2 min
Replay
Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.
20:00
P1
- P1 20:00Desjardins won the faceoff against Brodziak
- Goal
- Shot
- Miss
- Block
- Hit
- Takeaway
- Giveaway
- Faceoff
- Penalty
The numbers
Team totals, side by side.
Line combinations that worked
Model-basedEach team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.
Minnesota Wild
Forward lines
- Parise – Coyle – Niederreiter14:13
xG 0.40–0.37 (52%)attempts 13–15goals 0–0
- Cooke – Brodziak – Fontaine10:23
xG 0.10–0.13 (43%)attempts 4–11goals 0–1
- Rupp – Mitchell – Haula4:41
xG 0.00–0.15 (0%)attempts 1–5goals 0–0
- Heatley – Pominville – Granlund13:24
xG 0.20–0.58 (26%)attempts 8–14goals 1–0
Defence pairs
- Stoner – Prosser2:02
xG 0.02–0.00 (100%)attempts 1–0goals 0–0
- Suter – Scandella2:12
xG 0.00–0.02 (0%)attempts 2–1goals 0–0
- Ballard – Stoner7:22
xG 0.11–0.14 (45%)attempts 6–8goals 1–1
San Jose Sharks
Forward lines
- bestThornton – Pavelski – Nieto7:03
xG 0.63–0.06 (92%)attempts 16–5goals 1–0
- Kennedy – Desjardins – Hayes2:01
xG 0.09–0.00 (100%)attempts 2–1goals 0–0
- Brown – McCarthy – Hayes2:55
xG 0.04–0.08 (30%)attempts 2–2goals 0–0
- Marleau – Wingels – Nieto5:37
xG 0.05–0.15 (26%)attempts 3–6goals 0–0
Defence pairs
- bestBoyle – Irwin10:53
xG 0.62–0.20 (75%)attempts 16–9goals 1–0
- Vlasic – Demers10:49
xG 0.30–0.17 (63%)attempts 12–4goals 0–1
- Stuart – Braun12:21
xG 0.39–0.27 (59%)attempts 10–8goals 0–0
How the game flowed
Model-basedChance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.
Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.
Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute
Win probability
Model-basedHow each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.
SJS's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line SJS is favoured, below it MIN. Dots are goals.
Did the better team win?
Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.
Based on shot quality alone, San Jose Sharks win this game 67% of the time.
Simulated goal difference (SJS − MIN), 10,000 replays
The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).