Skip to content
Ice Lab

Thu, Mar 6, 2014·United Center, Chicago

Columbus Blue Jackets 1, Chicago Blackhawks 6

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Chicago Blackhawks win this game 73% of the time.

CHI winsCBJ wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
CBJ180708123
CHI27315111633

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 4:12CHIBrandon BolligAssists: Marcus Kruger · Backhand, 0.16 xG0–1
  2. P1 7:56CBJRyan JohansenAssists: Cam Atkinson, Dalton Prout · Wrist, 0.14 xG1–1
  3. P1 16:44CHIAndrew ShawGWGAssists: Sheldon Brookbank, Nick Leddy · Wrist, 0.12 xG1–2
  4. P2 8:00CHIJonathan ToewsAssists: Brandon Saad, Brent Seabrook · Wrist, 0.27 xG1–3
  5. P2 12:29CHIBryan BickellAssists: Kris Versteeg, Marcus Kruger · Wrist, 0.35 xG1–4
  6. P2 17:44CHIAndrew ShawAssists: Brent Seabrook, Duncan Keith · Tip-in, 0.15 xG1–5
  7. P3 3:04CHIJonathan ToewsPPAssists: Patrick Kane, Patrick Sharp · Slap, 0.04 xG1–6
Penalties (8)
  1. P1 13:10CBJNick Schultz: Interference2 min
  2. P1 13:20CHIJonathan Toews: Hooking2 min
  3. P2 18:34CBJBrandon Dubinsky: Roughing2 min
  4. P3 2:42CBJNathan Horton: Slashing2 min · PPG
  5. P3 6:29CHIKris Versteeg: Holding2 min
  6. P3 9:57CBJJames Wisniewski: Interference2 min
  7. P3 11:15CHIDuncan Keith: High sticking2 min
  8. P3 18:29CHIJohnny Oduya: Tripping2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

CBJ00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0CHI
48% to win52% to win
← CBJ attackCHI attack →
  1. P1 20:00Anisimov won the faceoff against Toews
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

CBJCHI
23Shots on goal33
1.7Expected goals3.0
37Shot attempts52
19Faceoffs won43
4Power plays4
8Penalty minutes8
36Hits19
12Blocked shots6
4Giveaways11
5Takeaways4

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Columbus Blue Jackets

Forward lines

  1. bestUmberger – Foligno – Johansen3:11

    xG 0.16–0.00 (100%)attempts 2–1goals 0–0

  2. Umberger – Foligno – Anisimov8:32

    xG 0.14–0.04 (76%)attempts 5–3goals 0–0

  3. Horton – Letestu – Jenner3:05

    xG 0.19–0.14 (58%)attempts 3–3goals 0–0

  4. MacKenzie – Horton – Jenner2:33

    xG 0.02–0.00 (100%)attempts 3–0goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestProut – Savard2:43

    xG 0.21–0.00 (100%)attempts 5–0goals 0–0

  2. Wisniewski – Nikitin6:06

    xG 0.28–0.09 (76%)attempts 2–6goals 0–0

  3. Schultz – Prout7:00

    xG 0.31–0.18 (63%)attempts 3–4goals 1–1

Chicago Blackhawks

Forward lines

  1. bestToews – Shaw – Saad11:08

    xG 1.03–0.28 (79%)attempts 15–3goals 2–0

  2. Handzus – Sharp – Kane11:15

    xG 0.65–0.34 (66%)attempts 13–9goals 0–0

  3. Smith – Kruger – Bollig10:59

    xG 0.27–0.13 (67%)attempts 9–2goals 1–0

  4. Bickell – Regin – Versteeg8:30

    xG 0.06–0.38 (13%)attempts 3–8goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestKeith – Seabrook15:05

    xG 0.95–0.36 (72%)attempts 17–6goals 3–0

  2. Brookbank – Leddy16:00

    xG 0.81–0.35 (70%)attempts 15–10goals 1–0

  3. Oduya – Hjalmarsson15:36

    xG 0.40–0.50 (44%)attempts 9–11goals 0–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

CHI 3.0 xGCBJ 1.7 xG
0123P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

CHICBJ

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

CHI's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line CHI is favoured, below it CBJ. Dots are goals.

Excitement 27/100 · #836 of 1230 this seasonSwing 0.89 · 5 goals in reachComeback index 51% (winner's lowest chance)
CBJ 100%5050%50CHI 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +21 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Chicago Blackhawks win this game 73% of the time.

CHI winsCBJ wins

Simulated goal difference (CHI − CBJ), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).