Skip to content
Ice Lab

Tue, Mar 18, 2014·Rexall Place, Edmonton

Nashville Predators 1, Edmonton Oilers 5

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Nashville Predators win this game 53% of the time.

EDM winsNSH wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
NSH0911406129
EDM1122929530

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 19:25EDMSam GagnerAssists: Martin Marincin, David Perron · Backhand, 0.26 xG0–1
  2. P2 8:18EDMRyan Nugent-HopkinsPPGWGAssists: Jordan Eberle, Philip Larsen · Snap, 0.10 xG0–2
  3. P2 14:48EDMTaylor HallAssists: Sam Gagner, Andrew Ference · Backhand, 0.07 xG0–3
  4. P2 18:39NSHGabriel BourqueAssists: Patric Hornqvist, Shea Weber · Wrist, 0.13 xG1–3
  5. P3 8:38EDMJordan EberleAssists: Anton Lander, Ryan Nugent-Hopkins · Backhand, 0.05 xG1–4
  6. P3 10:01EDMJordan EberleAssists: Ryan Nugent-Hopkins · Backhand, 0.06 xG1–5
Penalties (11)
  1. P1 0:48NSHRyan Ellis: Boarding2 min
  2. P1 4:26NSHMatt Cullen: Too many men on the ice2 min
  3. P1 11:46EDMMark Fraser: Roughing2 min
  4. P1 17:07EDMAndrew Ference: Tripping2 min
  5. P2 6:39NSHEric Nystrom: Tripping2 min · PPG
  6. P2 8:29EDMBoyd Gordon: Tripping2 min
  7. P2 14:48EDMMark Fraser: Holding2 min
  8. P3 3:16EDMJeff Petry: Hooking2 min
  9. P3 6:38NSHMichael Del Zotto: Interference2 min
  10. P3 18:11EDMLuke Gazdic: Unsportsmanlike conduct2 min
  11. P3 18:11NSHRich Clune: Unsportsmanlike conduct2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

NSH00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0EDM
48% to win52% to win
← NSH attackEDM attack →
  1. P1 20:00Wilson won the faceoff against Nugent-Hopkins
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

NSHEDM
29Shots on goal30
2.5Expected goals2.4
58Shot attempts54
36Faceoffs won27
5Power plays4
10Penalty minutes12
12Hits9
13Blocked shots14
5Giveaways12
3Takeaways13

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Nashville Predators

Forward lines

  1. bestCullen – Eaves – Bourque2:57

    xG 0.28–0.06 (84%)attempts 7–2goals 0–0

  2. Fisher – Hornqvist – Spaling2:40

    xG 0.12–0.03 (80%)attempts 3–2goals 0–0

  3. Gaustad – Eaves – Sissons2:42

    xG 0.07–0.00 (100%)attempts 2–0goals 0–0

  4. Cullen – Smith – Bourque3:40

    xG 0.13–0.13 (49%)attempts 5–4goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestWeber – Josi13:54

    xG 0.69–0.35 (67%)attempts 20–11goals 1–0

  2. Ekholm – Jones8:40

    xG 0.31–0.06 (83%)attempts 7–2goals 0–0

  3. Del Zotto – Ellis13:46

    xG 0.52–0.58 (47%)attempts 13–18goals 0–2

Edmonton Oilers

Forward lines

  1. bestEberle – Lander – Nugent-Hopkins9:21

    xG 0.32–0.12 (74%)attempts 8–4goals 1–0

  2. Gagner – Perron – Hall9:45

    xG 0.63–0.66 (49%)attempts 14–16goals 2–1

  3. Smyth – Hendricks – Gordon4:56

    xG 0.06–0.22 (22%)attempts 3–5goals 0–0

  4. Gazdic – Eberle – Nugent-Hopkins2:16

    xG 0.00–0.26 (0%)attempts 0–4goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestPetry – Marincin11:53

    xG 0.67–0.20 (77%)attempts 11–9goals 1–0

  2. Schultz – Larsen3:48

    xG 0.12–0.15 (44%)attempts 3–4goals 1–0

  3. Fraser – Klefbom8:52

    xG 0.17–0.29 (37%)attempts 7–8goals 0–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

EDM 2.4 xGNSH 2.5 xG
00.511.522.5P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

EDMNSH

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

EDM's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line EDM is favoured, below it NSH. Dots are goals.

Excitement 24/100 · #878 of 1230 this seasonSwing 0.74 · 5 goals in reachComeback index 50% (winner's lowest chance)
NSH 100%5050%50EDM 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +22 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Nashville Predators win this game 53% of the time.

EDM winsNSH wins

Simulated goal difference (EDM − NSH), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).