Skip to content
Ice Lab

Fri, Mar 28, 2014·Wells Fargo Center, Philadelphia

Toronto Maple Leafs 2, Philadelphia Flyers 4

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Philadelphia Flyers win this game 52% of the time.

PHI winsTOR wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
TOR09114111234
PHI19110210429

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 5:35PHIVincent LecavalierPPAssists: Kimmo Timonen, Claude Giroux · Slap, 0.09 xG0–1
  2. P2 0:04TORJames van RiemsdykAssists: Tyler Bozak · Slap, 0.10 xG1–1
  3. P2 11:03PHIScott HartnellPPAssists: Kimmo Timonen, Claude Giroux · Wrist, 0.08 xG1–2
  4. P3 4:55PHIClaude GirouxGWGAssists: Scott Hartnell · Snap, 0.03 xG1–3
  5. P3 6:18TORDave BollandAssists: Mason Raymond, Jake Gardiner · Snap, 0.46 xG2–3
  6. P3 12:39PHIWayne SimmondsAssists: Zac Rinaldo, Andrew MacDonald · Wrist, 0.10 xG2–4
Penalties (13)
  1. P1 5:08TORCody Franson: Holding2 min · PPG
  2. P1 5:32TORNikolay Kulemin: Tripping2 min
  3. P1 18:01PHIZac Rinaldo: Too many men on the ice2 min
  4. P2 1:41TORCarl Gunnarsson: Interference2 min
  5. P2 2:27PHIScott Hartnell: Slashing2 min
  6. P2 10:58TORDave Bolland: Interference2 min · PPG
  7. P2 15:49TORNazem Kadri: Roughing2 min
  8. P2 15:49PHISteve Mason: Slashing2 min
  9. P2 17:51PHIAndrew MacDonald: Slashing2 min
  10. P3 15:50PHIScott Hartnell: High sticking2 min
  11. P3 18:41TORDion Phaneuf: Roughing2 min
  12. P3 18:41PHIJakub Voracek: Roughing2 min
  13. P3 18:41TORDion Phaneuf: Charging2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

TOR00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0PHI
48% to win52% to win
← TOR attackPHI attack →
  1. P1 20:00Couturier won the faceoff against Bozak
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

TORPHI
34Shots on goal29
2.5Expected goals2.6
55Shot attempts65
29Faceoffs won34
4Power plays5
14Penalty minutes12
44Hits35
19Blocked shots17
7Giveaways9
7Takeaways7

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Toronto Maple Leafs

Forward lines

  1. Orr – McClement – Bodie3:56

    xG 0.10–0.13 (43%)attempts 5–3goals 0–0

  2. Lupul – Kulemin – Kadri7:11

    xG 0.25–0.30 (46%)attempts 6–8goals 0–1

  3. Clarkson – Bolland – Raymond8:03

    xG 0.16–0.25 (38%)attempts 8–7goals 0–0

  4. Kessel – van Riemsdyk – Bozak15:00

    xG 0.40–0.53 (43%)attempts 11–14goals 1–1

Defence pairs

  1. bestPhaneuf – Gunnarsson9:07

    xG 0.80–0.48 (63%)attempts 8–12goals 0–0

  2. Franson – Gardiner14:57

    xG 0.40–0.22 (64%)attempts 18–7goals 1–0

  3. Gunnarsson – Rielly3:38

    xG 0.00–0.07 (6%)attempts 1–3goals 0–0

Philadelphia Flyers

Forward lines

  1. bestSimmonds – Schenn – McGinn6:37

    xG 0.56–0.18 (76%)attempts 9–6goals 1–0

  2. Read – Couturier – Raffl10:42

    xG 0.22–0.11 (67%)attempts 6–8goals 0–0

  3. Lecavalier – Hall – Rinaldo8:54

    xG 0.19–0.14 (58%)attempts 8–8goals 0–0

  4. Hartnell – Giroux – Voracek11:14

    xG 0.70–0.98 (42%)attempts 19–11goals 1–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestCoburn – Grossmann3:22

    xG 0.26–0.06 (82%)attempts 5–3goals 0–0

  2. Timonen – Coburn9:04

    xG 0.37–0.32 (53%)attempts 10–7goals 0–1

  3. MacDonald – Schenn13:13

    xG 0.30–0.26 (54%)attempts 9–12goals 1–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

PHI 2.6 xGTOR 2.5 xG
00.511.522.5P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

PHITOR

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

PHI's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line PHI is favoured, below it TOR. Dots are goals.

Excitement 45/100 · #616 of 1230 this seasonSwing 1.31 · 6 goals in reachComeback index 49% (winner's lowest chance)
TOR 100%5050%50PHI 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +23 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Philadelphia Flyers win this game 52% of the time.

PHI winsTOR wins

Simulated goal difference (PHI − TOR), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).