Sun, Mar 30, 2014·Joe Louis Arena, Detroit
Tampa Bay Lightning 2, Detroit Red Wings 3
Expected result
Based on shot quality alone, Detroit Red Wings win this game 51% of the time.
By period
Goals and shots on goal in each period.
| Team | P1 | P2 | P3 | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TBL | 16 | 013 | 19 | 228 |
| DET | 212 | 18 | 010 | 330 |
Goals, with shots on goal in grey.
Scoring
Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.
- P1 8:40TBLValtteri FilppulaUnassisted · Wrist, 0.07 xG1–0
- P1 11:08DETJoakim AnderssonAssists: Darren Helm, Daniel Alfredsson · Backhand, 0.26 xG1–1
- P1 15:24DETGustav NyquistAssists: David Legwand · Wrist, 0.03 xG1–2
- P2 16:36DETDavid LegwandPPGWGAssists: Johan Franzen, Niklas Kronwall · Tip-in, 0.17 xG1–3
- P3 15:31TBLSami SaloAssists: Nikita Kucherov · Slap, 0.02 xG2–3
Penalties (7)
- P1 18:22TBLRadko Gudas: High sticking2 min
- P2 2:58DETKyle Quincey: Holding2 min
- P2 8:34DETBrendan Smith: Cross checking2 min
- P2 15:17TBLAlex Killorn: Holding2 min · PPG
- P3 2:03DETBrendan Smith: Tripping2 min
- P3 7:29DETDavid Legwand: Too many men on the ice2 min
- P3 9:50TBLVictor Hedman: Delaying game puck over glass2 min
Replay
Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.
20:00
P1
- P1 20:00Glendening won the faceoff against Filppula
- Goal
- Shot
- Miss
- Block
- Hit
- Takeaway
- Giveaway
- Faceoff
- Penalty
The numbers
Team totals, side by side.
Line combinations that worked
Model-basedEach team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.
Tampa Bay Lightning
Forward lines
- bestPurcell – Stamkos – Brown9:48
xG 0.66–0.57 (54%)attempts 7–10goals 0–1
- Filppula – Callahan – Palat11:00
xG 0.25–0.20 (56%)attempts 8–4goals 1–0
- Killorn – Johnson – Kucherov7:08
xG 0.16–0.43 (27%)attempts 6–6goals 0–0
- Thompson – Panik – Brown2:54
xG 0.03–0.34 (9%)attempts 1–4goals 0–1
Defence pairs
- bestBarberio – Hedman4:39
xG 0.73–0.07 (91%)attempts 9–3goals 1–0
- Brewer – Barberio4:41
xG 0.27–0.14 (66%)attempts 4–3goals 0–0
- Salo – Hedman6:39
xG 0.23–0.13 (64%)attempts 5–3goals 0–0
Detroit Red Wings
Forward lines
- bestLegwand – Franzen – Nyquist11:32
xG 1.20–0.31 (80%)attempts 17–7goals 1–1
- Alfredsson – Helm – Andersson7:14
xG 0.68–0.16 (81%)attempts 7–7goals 1–0
- Tatar – Sheahan – Jurco7:52
xG 0.38–0.09 (81%)attempts 8–3goals 0–0
- Miller – Abdelkader – Glendening11:29
xG 0.21–0.58 (27%)attempts 6–10goals 0–1
Defence pairs
- bestQuincey – DeKeyser15:00
xG 0.95–0.44 (68%)attempts 12–11goals 1–1
- Kindl – Lashoff7:33
xG 0.64–0.14 (82%)attempts 7–2goals 1–0
- Kronwall – DeKeyser2:21
xG 0.20–0.03 (89%)attempts 5–1goals 0–0
How the game flowed
Model-basedChance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.
Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.
Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute
Win probability
Model-basedHow each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.
DET's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line DET is favoured, below it TBL. Dots are goals.
Did the better team win?
Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.
Based on shot quality alone, Detroit Red Wings win this game 51% of the time.
Simulated goal difference (DET − TBL), 10,000 replays
The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).