Skip to content
Ice Lab

Tue, Apr 8, 2014·Xcel Energy Center, St. Paul

Boston Bruins 3, Minnesota Wild 4 (SO)

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Minnesota Wild win this game 64% of the time.

MIN winsBOS wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3OTSOTotal
BOS261907020324
MIN290415061424

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 1:05MINJason PominvillePPAssists: Mikko Koivu, Zach Parise · Slap, 0.02 xG0–1
  2. P1 3:00BOSReilly SmithPPUnassisted · Slap, 0.05 xG1–1
  3. P1 10:28BOSPatrice BergeronAssists: Brad Marchand, Zdeno Chara · Wrist, 0.13 xG2–1
  4. P1 10:56MINJason PominvilleAssists: Matt Moulson, Erik Haula · Wrist, 0.08 xG2–2
  5. P2 16:18BOSLoui ErikssonPPAssists: Gregory Campbell, Zdeno Chara · Tip-in, 0.08 xG3–2
  6. P3 18:55MINRyan SuterAssists: Jason Pominville, Mikko Koivu · Wrist, 0.05 xG3–3

Shootout

  1. 1. MIN Zach Parise stopped
  2. 2. BOS Patrice Bergeron stopped
  3. 3. MIN Mikko Koivu scored
  4. 4. BOS Reilly Smith stopped
  5. 5. MIN Jason Pominville stopped
  6. 6. BOS Brad Marchand stopped
Penalties (8)
  1. P1 0:41BOSMilan Lucic: Tripping2 min · PPG
  2. P1 2:07MINRyan Suter: Slashing2 min · PPG
  3. P2 13:18BOSShawn Thornton: Holding2 min
  4. P2 14:38MINJustin Fontaine: Tripping2 min · PPG
  5. P3 6:56MINErik Haula: Tripping2 min
  6. P3 7:34BOSLoui Eriksson: High sticking2 min
  7. P3 8:11MINMatt Moulson: Hooking2 min
  8. P3 14:28MINRyan Suter: Interference2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

BOS00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0MIN
48% to win52% to win
← BOS attackMIN attack →
  1. P1 20:00Bergeron won the faceoff against Brodziak
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

BOSMIN
24Shots on goal24
1.5Expected goals2.2
54Shot attempts47
25Faceoffs won43
5Power plays2
6Penalty minutes10
13Hits11
10Blocked shots22
5Giveaways3
5Takeaways11

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Boston Bruins

Forward lines

  1. Bergeron – Marchand – Smith11:18

    xG 0.23–0.28 (45%)attempts 8–8goals 1–0

  2. Kelly – Paille – Caron7:18

    xG 0.17–0.34 (34%)attempts 10–5goals 0–0

  3. Eriksson – Soderberg – Lucic14:08

    xG 0.34–0.64 (34%)attempts 12–14goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestBoychuk – Bartkowski12:32

    xG 0.32–0.24 (57%)attempts 11–7goals 0–0

  2. Chara – Hamilton12:47

    xG 0.28–0.34 (45%)attempts 12–9goals 0–0

  3. Potter – Meszaros8:43

    xG 0.00–0.39 (0%)attempts 4–8goals 0–0

Minnesota Wild

Forward lines

  1. bestKoivu – Parise – Coyle13:56

    xG 0.70–0.22 (76%)attempts 16–10goals 0–1

  2. Pominville – Moulson – Haula9:19

    xG 0.49–0.22 (69%)attempts 6–8goals 1–0

  3. Veilleux – McCormick – Niederreiter7:34

    xG 0.05–0.03 (63%)attempts 2–6goals 0–0

  4. Cooke – Brodziak – Fontaine11:14

    xG 0.18–0.27 (41%)attempts 5–12goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestBlum – Scandella10:07

    xG 0.45–0.15 (75%)attempts 6–13goals 0–0

  2. Suter – Spurgeon17:20

    xG 0.52–0.23 (69%)attempts 12–10goals 1–1

  3. Suter – Brodin5:14

    xG 0.04–0.02 (69%)attempts 3–1goals 0–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

MIN 2.2 xGBOS 1.5 xG
00.511.52P1P2P3OTEndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

MINBOS

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

MIN's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line MIN is favoured, below it BOS. Dots are goals.

Excitement 84/100 · #156 of 1230 this seasonSwing 2.25 · 6 goals in reachComeback index 5% (winner's lowest chance)
BOS 100%5050%50MIN 100%P1P2P3OTEndBiggest swing +43 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Minnesota Wild win this game 64% of the time.

MIN winsBOS wins

Simulated goal difference (MIN − BOS), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).