Skip to content
Ice Lab

Tue, Oct 21, 2014·Bridgestone Arena, Nashville

Arizona Coyotes 3, Nashville Predators 4 (SO)

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Nashville Predators win this game 54% of the time.

NSH winsARI wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3OTSOTotal
ARI1819117021336
NSH1101815032426

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 3:21ARIRob KlinkhammerAssists: David Moss, Kyle Chipchura · Snap, 0.21 xG1–0
  2. P1 12:05NSHMike RibeiroAssists: Ryan Ellis · Wrist, 0.13 xG1–1
  3. P2 5:12NSHRyan EllisAssists: Derek Roy, Seth Jones · Wrist, 0.08 xG1–2
  4. P2 11:48ARIKeith YandlePPAssists: Antoine Vermette · Wrist, 0.09 xG2–2
  5. P3 7:42ARIMartin EratPPAssists: Oliver Ekman-Larsson, Keith Yandle · Snap, 0.22 xG3–2
  6. P3 8:03NSHJames NealAssists: Mike Ribeiro, Ryan Ellis · Slap, 0.04 xG3–3

Shootout

  1. 1. NSH Derek Roy scored
  2. 2. ARI Mikkel Boedker stopped
  3. 3. NSH Craig Smith stopped
  4. 4. ARI Sam Gagner stopped
  5. 5. NSH Filip Forsberg stopped
  6. 6. ARI Antoine Vermette scored
  7. 7. NSH Ryan Ellis scored
  8. 8. ARI Martin Erat stopped
Penalties (10)
  1. P2 3:09ARIBrandon McMillan: Hooking2 min
  2. P2 5:48NSHViktor Stalberg: Hooking2 min
  3. P2 7:19ARIAntoine Vermette: Holding2 min
  4. P2 11:45NSHCalle Jarnkrok: Unsportsmanlike conduct2 min · PPG
  5. P2 12:08ARIAntoine Vermette: Hooking2 min
  6. P2 14:16ARIRob Klinkhammer: Too many men on the ice2 min
  7. P3 2:06ARISam Gagner: Tripping2 min
  8. P3 5:48NSHRyan Ellis: Interference2 min · PPG
  9. P3 10:08NSHViktor Stalberg: Holding2 min
  10. P3 19:44NSHJames Neal: Slashing2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

ARI00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0NSH
46% to win54% to win
← ARI attackNSH attack →
  1. P1 20:00Ribeiro won the faceoff against Chipchura
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

ARINSH
36Shots on goal26
2.5Expected goals2.7
59Shot attempts59
39Faceoffs won32
5Power plays5
10Penalty minutes10
16Hits18
16Blocked shots17
4Giveaways10
7Takeaways6

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Arizona Coyotes

Forward lines

  1. bestErat – Korpikoski – Gagner9:44

    xG 0.47–0.23 (67%)attempts 10–6goals 0–0

  2. Crombeen – Vitale – McMillan4:11

    xG 0.16–0.10 (62%)attempts 3–3goals 0–0

  3. Moss – Chipchura – Klinkhammer9:19

    xG 0.47–0.41 (53%)attempts 8–10goals 1–1

  4. Doan – Vermette – Boedker12:57

    xG 0.44–0.46 (49%)attempts 10–9goals 0–1

Defence pairs

  1. bestYandle – Stone16:28

    xG 0.59–0.10 (85%)attempts 15–8goals 1–0

  2. Ekman-Larsson – Murphy12:36

    xG 0.62–0.37 (62%)attempts 10–11goals 0–2

  3. Michalek – Schlemko13:22

    xG 0.47–0.88 (35%)attempts 14–12goals 0–1

Nashville Predators

Forward lines

  1. bestRibeiro – Neal – Forsberg11:07

    xG 0.51–0.26 (66%)attempts 10–6goals 2–0

  2. Jokinen – Stalberg – Jarnkrok10:54

    xG 0.39–0.17 (69%)attempts 7–9goals 0–0

  3. Roy – Wilson – Smith9:23

    xG 0.52–0.34 (60%)attempts 11–7goals 1–0

  4. Gaustad – Nystrom – Bourque6:29

    xG 0.01–0.51 (3%)attempts 2–6goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestEllis – Ekholm11:44

    xG 0.43–0.09 (83%)attempts 9–9goals 2–0

  2. Volchenkov – Jones11:08

    xG 0.32–0.38 (45%)attempts 8–8goals 0–0

  3. Weber – Josi17:49

    xG 0.27–0.56 (32%)attempts 10–18goals 0–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

NSH 2.7 xGARI 2.5 xG
-0.500.511.522.53P1P2P3OTEndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

NSHARI

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

NSH's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line NSH is favoured, below it ARI. Dots are goals.

Excitement 86/100 · #142 of 1230 this seasonSwing 2.33 · 6 goals in reachComeback index 22% (winner's lowest chance)
ARI 100%5050%50NSH 100%P1P2P3OTEndBiggest swing +29 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Nashville Predators win this game 54% of the time.

NSH winsARI wins

Simulated goal difference (NSH − ARI), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).