Thu, Oct 23, 2014·TD Garden, Boston
New York Islanders 3, Boston Bruins 2
Expected result
Based on shot quality alone, Boston Bruins win this game 61% of the time.
By period
Goals and shots on goal in each period.
| Team | P1 | P2 | P3 | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| NYI | 115 | 212 | 011 | 338 |
| BOS | 111 | 06 | 115 | 232 |
Goals, with shots on goal in grey.
Scoring
Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.
- P1 6:21NYIFrans NielsenAssists: Josh Bailey, Nikolay Kulemin · Wrist, 0.30 xG1–0
- P1 18:21BOSMilan LucicAssists: Seth Griffith, David Krejci · Tip-in, 0.12 xG1–1
- P2 1:30NYIKyle OkposoAssists: John Tavares, Brian Strait · Wrist, 0.47 xG2–1
- P2 9:27NYICal ClutterbuckGWGAssists: Matt Martin, Nick Leddy · Wrist, 0.11 xG3–1
- P3 9:49BOSChris KellyAssists: Carl Soderberg, Loui Eriksson · Wrist, 0.12 xG3–2
Penalties (2)
- P1 2:38NYIAnders Lee: Interference2 min
- P1 15:15BOSSeth Griffith: Interference2 min
Replay
Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.
20:00
P1
- P1 20:00Nielsen won the faceoff against Kelly
- Goal
- Shot
- Miss
- Block
- Hit
- Takeaway
- Giveaway
- Faceoff
- Penalty
The numbers
Team totals, side by side.
Line combinations that worked
Model-basedEach team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.
New York Islanders
Forward lines
- bestNielsen – Kulemin – Bailey4:55
xG 0.71–0.05 (93%)attempts 6–2goals 1–0
- Okposo – Tavares – Conacher7:14
xG 0.91–0.25 (78%)attempts 11–8goals 1–0
- Okposo – Kulemin – Tavares9:02
xG 0.35–0.20 (64%)attempts 9–10goals 0–0
- Clutterbuck – Martin – Cizikas7:35
xG 0.16–0.12 (58%)attempts 4–6goals 1–0
Defence pairs
- bestStrait – de Haan16:43
xG 1.21–0.87 (58%)attempts 18–24goals 2–1
- Visnovsky – Hickey15:55
xG 0.89–0.66 (57%)attempts 16–17goals 0–1
- Boychuk – Leddy19:01
xG 0.63–0.50 (56%)attempts 16–17goals 1–0
Boston Bruins
Forward lines
- bestKelly – Eriksson – Soderberg12:29
xG 0.63–0.37 (63%)attempts 16–10goals 1–1
- Bergeron – Marchand – Smith10:45
xG 0.41–0.29 (59%)attempts 12–11goals 0–0
- Gagne – Campbell – Paille10:03
xG 0.14–0.07 (66%)attempts 6–3goals 0–0
- Krejci – Lucic – Griffith12:52
xG 0.55–0.70 (44%)attempts 19–11goals 1–0
Defence pairs
- bestBartkowski – Hamilton5:31
xG 0.61–0.11 (84%)attempts 8–6goals 1–0
- Seidenberg – McQuaid6:19
xG 0.28–0.10 (73%)attempts 7–6goals 1–0
- Seidenberg – Hamilton7:24
xG 0.36–0.19 (66%)attempts 10–5goals 0–0
How the game flowed
Model-basedChance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.
Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.
Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute
Win probability
Model-basedHow each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.
BOS's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line BOS is favoured, below it NYI. Dots are goals.
Did the better team win?
Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.
Based on shot quality alone, Boston Bruins win this game 61% of the time.
Simulated goal difference (BOS − NYI), 10,000 replays
The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).