Skip to content
Ice Lab

Tue, Nov 4, 2014·Centre Bell, Montreal

Chicago Blackhawks 5, Montréal Canadiens 0

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Chicago Blackhawks win this game 71% of the time.

MTL winsCHI wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
CHI15117310532
MTL0110809028

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 11:19CHIJonathan ToewsPPGWGAssists: Duncan Keith, Andrew Shaw · Tip-in, 0.16 xG1–0
  2. P2 9:57CHIMarcus KrugerAssists: Kris Versteeg, David Rundblad · Tip-in, 0.23 xG2–0
  3. P3 2:22CHIBrad RichardsAssists: Patrick Sharp, Brandon Saad · Tip-in, 0.17 xG3–0
  4. P3 12:31CHIPatrick KaneAssists: Jonathan Toews, Niklas Hjalmarsson · Backhand, 0.12 xG4–0
  5. P3 14:46CHIKris VersteegAssists: Bryan Bickell, David Rundblad · Backhand, 0.06 xG5–0
Penalties (11)
  1. P1 0:57CHIDuncan Keith: Slashing2 min
  2. P1 5:47CHIKris Versteeg: Interference2 min
  3. P1 5:47MTLMike Weaver: Embellishment2 min
  4. P1 10:18MTLAlexei Emelin: Hooking2 min · PPG
  5. P1 14:01CHIMarian Hossa: Tripping2 min
  6. P2 10:07CHIPatrick Sharp: Too many men on the ice2 min
  7. P2 10:58MTLP.K. Subban: Holding2 min
  8. P2 16:53MTLTom Gilbert: High sticking double minor4 min
  9. P3 0:18CHIJonathan Toews: Hooking2 min
  10. P3 0:18MTLBrandon Prust: Embellishment2 min
  11. P3 6:55CHIMarian Hossa: Slashing2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

CHI00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0MTL
46% to win54% to win
← CHI attackMTL attack →
  1. P1 20:00Toews won the faceoff against Plekanec
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

CHIMTL
32Shots on goal28
2.7Expected goals1.6
70Shot attempts50
32Faceoffs won32
4Power plays4
12Penalty minutes12
13Hits25
15Blocked shots24
7Giveaways16
4Takeaways4

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Chicago Blackhawks

Forward lines

  1. bestHossa – Sharp – Shaw8:24

    xG 0.49–0.22 (69%)attempts 11–5goals 0–0

  2. Toews – Kane – Smith6:56

    xG 0.21–0.04 (85%)attempts 10–4goals 1–0

  3. Bickell – Versteeg – Kruger8:24

    xG 0.45–0.34 (57%)attempts 8–11goals 2–0

  4. Versteeg – Toews – Kane2:00

    xG 0.03–0.02 (56%)attempts 3–2goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestOduya – Hjalmarsson14:58

    xG 0.69–0.16 (81%)attempts 16–14goals 2–0

  2. Rundblad – van Riemsdyk12:09

    xG 0.77–0.26 (75%)attempts 16–8goals 2–0

  3. Keith – Seabrook12:28

    xG 0.26–0.46 (36%)attempts 14–11goals 0–0

Montréal Canadiens

Forward lines

  1. bestMalhotra – Prust – Bournival6:07

    xG 0.24–0.06 (79%)attempts 5–6goals 0–0

  2. Plekanec – Gallagher – Galchenyuk11:34

    xG 0.41–0.37 (53%)attempts 11–11goals 0–0

  3. Parenteau – Desharnais – Pacioretty2:43

    xG 0.05–0.05 (51%)attempts 4–2goals 0–0

  4. Parenteau – Bourque – Eller6:46

    xG 0.26–0.44 (37%)attempts 6–5goals 0–2

Defence pairs

  1. bestGilbert – Emelin8:48

    xG 0.38–0.24 (61%)attempts 8–11goals 0–0

  2. Weaver – Beaulieu7:24

    xG 0.29–0.17 (63%)attempts 8–5goals 0–0

  3. Gilbert – Beaulieu5:10

    xG 0.12–0.05 (73%)attempts 5–4goals 0–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

MTL 1.6 xGCHI 2.7 xG
-0.500.511.522.53P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

MTLCHI

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

MTL's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line MTL is favoured, below it CHI. Dots are goals.

Excitement 8/100 · #1114 of 1230 this seasonSwing 0.71 · 3 goals in reachComeback index 44% (winner's lowest chance)
CHI 100%5050%50MTL 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +16 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Chicago Blackhawks win this game 71% of the time.

MTL winsCHI wins

Simulated goal difference (MTL − CHI), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).