Skip to content
Ice Lab

Tue, Nov 4, 2014·Pepsi Center, Denver

Vancouver Canucks 5, Colorado Avalanche 2

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Vancouver Canucks win this game 80% of the time.

COL winsVAN wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
VAN011116410537
COL270807222

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 1:15COLJohn MitchellAssists: Alex Tanguay, Dennis Everberg · Wrist, 0.04 xG0–1
  2. P1 16:33COLJamie McGinnAssists: Jarome Iginla, Erik Johnson · Wrist, 0.17 xG0–2
  3. P2 19:56VANHenrik SedinAssists: Daniel Sedin, Alexander Edler · Wrist, 0.32 xG1–2
  4. P3 2:27VANDerek DorsettAssists: Dan Hamhuis, Zack Kassian · Deflected, 0.12 xG2–2
  5. P3 4:47VANNick BoninoGWGAssists: Chris Higgins, Linden Vey · Wrist, 0.20 xG3–2
  6. P3 9:16VANNick BoninoAssists: Chris Higgins, Jannik Hansen · Wrist, 0.09 xG4–2
  7. P3 13:10VANShawn MatthiasUnassisted · Wrist, 0.03 xG5–2
Penalties (8)
  1. P1 3:27COLMarc-Andre Cliche: High sticking2 min
  2. P1 7:55VANKevin Bieksa: High sticking double minor4 min
  3. P2 2:28COLNick Holden: Interference2 min
  4. P2 7:06COLNick Holden: Tripping2 min
  5. P2 9:20VANDan Hamhuis: Slashing2 min
  6. P2 14:18VANKevin Bieksa: Cross checking2 min
  7. P3 10:17COLNathan MacKinnon: Holding2 min
  8. P3 18:05VANKevin Bieksa: Delaying game puck over glass2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

VAN00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0COL
46% to win54% to win
← VAN attackCOL attack →
  1. P1 20:00Sedin won the faceoff against Duchene
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

VANCOL
37Shots on goal22
3.0Expected goals1.3
71Shot attempts41
29Faceoffs won29
4Power plays5
10Penalty minutes8
11Hits18
12Blocked shots24
0Giveaways9
5Takeaways6

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Vancouver Canucks

Forward lines

  1. bestRichardson – Matthias – Kassian8:59

    xG 0.79–0.32 (71%)attempts 11–7goals 1–2

  2. Higgins – Bonino – Vey7:06

    xG 0.44–0.14 (76%)attempts 8–3goals 2–0

  3. Sedin – Sedin – Vrbata11:13

    xG 0.37–0.22 (63%)attempts 18–11goals 0–0

  4. Hansen – Dorsett – Horvat5:53

    xG 0.16–0.12 (57%)attempts 7–5goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestEdler – Tanev12:13

    xG 0.83–0.17 (83%)attempts 10–8goals 1–0

  2. Hamhuis – Weber10:35

    xG 0.40–0.31 (56%)attempts 18–7goals 1–2

  3. Bieksa – Stanton10:57

    xG 0.34–0.26 (57%)attempts 12–9goals 0–0

Colorado Avalanche

Forward lines

  1. bestIginla – Landeskog – MacKinnon3:03

    xG 0.19–0.03 (88%)attempts 4–1goals 0–1

  2. McGinn – O'Reilly – Duchene2:03

    xG 0.06–0.00 (100%)attempts 2–0goals 0–0

  3. Iginla – McGinn – O'Reilly7:46

    xG 0.34–0.46 (43%)attempts 8–7goals 1–2

  4. Talbot – McLeod – Cliche4:08

    xG 0.00–0.17 (0%)attempts 1–6goals 0–1

Defence pairs

  1. Stuart – Holden5:31

    xG 0.04–0.05 (45%)attempts 3–3goals 0–0

  2. Guenin – Barrie7:11

    xG 0.24–0.31 (44%)attempts 6–8goals 1–1

  3. Hejda – Holden2:09

    xG 0.07–0.17 (30%)attempts 2–4goals 0–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

COL 1.3 xGVAN 3.0 xG
0123P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

COLVAN

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

COL's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line COL is favoured, below it VAN. Dots are goals.

Excitement 71/100 · #300 of 1230 this seasonSwing 1.47 · 7 goals in reach · 2-goal lead cutComeback index 9% (winner's lowest chance)
VAN 100%5050%50COL 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +27 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Vancouver Canucks win this game 80% of the time.

COL winsVAN wins

Simulated goal difference (COL − VAN), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).