Skip to content
Ice Lab

Thu, Nov 6, 2014·Amalie Arena, Tampa

Calgary Flames 2, Tampa Bay Lightning 5

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Tampa Bay Lightning win this game 64% of the time.

TBL winsCGY wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
CGY11211009231
TBL19213211533

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 9:55TBLCedric PaquetteAssists: Jonathan Drouin · Wrist, 0.09 xG0–1
  2. P1 15:22CGYJiri HudlerAssists: TJ Brodie, Mark Giordano · Wrist, 0.03 xG1–1
  3. P2 1:01TBLCedric PaquetteAssists: Vladislav Namestnikov, Jason Garrison · Wrist, 0.29 xG1–2
  4. P2 4:02TBLBrian BoyleSHGWGUnassisted · Wrist, 0.16 xG1–3
  5. P2 4:22CGYSean MonahanPPAssists: Johnny Gaudreau, Mark Giordano · Wrist, 0.28 xG2–3
  6. P3 0:40TBLTyler JohnsonAssists: Nikita Kucherov, Ondrej Palat · Wrist, 0.06 xG2–4
  7. P3 17:50TBLValtteri FilppulaENUnassisted · Wrist, 0.65 xG2–5
Penalties (9)
  1. P2 2:48TBLEric Brewer: Hooking2 min · PPG
  2. P2 5:39CGYCurtis Glencross: Hooking2 min
  3. P2 5:39TBLTyler Johnson: Embellishment2 min
  4. P2 5:58CGYMarkus Granlund: Embellishment2 min
  5. P2 5:58TBLAnton Stralman: Elbowing2 min
  6. P2 7:14TBLJonathan Drouin: Tripping2 min
  7. P2 14:42CGYTJ Brodie: Hooking2 min
  8. P3 4:12TBLEric Brewer: Cross checking2 min
  9. P3 8:10TBLBrian Boyle: Hooking2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

CGY00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0TBL
46% to win54% to win
← CGY attackTBL attack →
  1. P1 20:00Johnson won the faceoff against Monahan
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

CGYTBL
31Shots on goal33
2.6Expected goals3.4
59Shot attempts60
24Faceoffs won37
4Power plays1
6Penalty minutes12
13Hits17
12Blocked shots19
6Giveaways6
3Takeaways8

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Calgary Flames

Forward lines

  1. bestSetoguchi – Byron – Baertschi8:21

    xG 0.70–0.18 (80%)attempts 15–5goals 0–0

  2. Glencross – Monahan – Jooris11:19

    xG 0.48–0.55 (47%)attempts 9–13goals 0–1

  3. Hudler – Gaudreau – Monahan2:07

    xG 0.01–0.08 (13%)attempts 1–4goals 0–0

  4. Jones – Bouma – Bollig6:24

    xG 0.14–0.30 (32%)attempts 1–8goals 0–1

Defence pairs

  1. Wideman – Russell15:22

    xG 0.58–0.58 (50%)attempts 13–18goals 0–1

  2. Giordano – Brodie18:45

    xG 0.59–0.85 (41%)attempts 16–17goals 1–1

  3. Engelland – Diaz8:55

    xG 0.19–0.57 (25%)attempts 5–12goals 0–1

Tampa Bay Lightning

Forward lines

  1. bestNamestnikov – Paquette – Drouin9:20

    xG 0.82–0.08 (91%)attempts 12–5goals 2–0

  2. Johnson – Palat – Kucherov12:16

    xG 0.50–0.32 (61%)attempts 16–6goals 1–0

  3. Filppula – Callahan – Stamkos13:01

    xG 0.59–0.53 (52%)attempts 14–14goals 0–1

  4. Morrow – Boyle – Brown9:09

    xG 0.22–0.17 (56%)attempts 9–4goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestCarle – Gudas3:17

    xG 0.33–0.00 (100%)attempts 7–1goals 1–0

  2. Carle – Stralman10:34

    xG 0.51–0.32 (61%)attempts 14–8goals 1–0

  3. Garrison – Gudas14:16

    xG 0.99–0.99 (50%)attempts 19–16goals 1–1

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

TBL 3.4 xGCGY 2.6 xG
01234P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

TBLCGY

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

TBL's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line TBL is favoured, below it CGY. Dots are goals.

Excitement 54/100 · #520 of 1230 this seasonSwing 1.26 · 7 goals in reachComeback index 53% (winner's lowest chance)
CGY 100%5050%50TBL 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +20 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Tampa Bay Lightning win this game 64% of the time.

TBL winsCGY wins

Simulated goal difference (TBL − CGY), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).