Skip to content
Ice Lab

Sat, Nov 8, 2014·First Niagara Center, Buffalo

Pittsburgh Penguins 6, Buffalo Sabres 1

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Pittsburgh Penguins win this game 84% of the time.

BUF winsPIT wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
PIT311315013639
BUF041809121

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 1:21PITKris LetangAssists: Sidney Crosby, Patric Hornqvist · Wrist, 0.15 xG1–0
  2. P1 3:31PITPatric HornqvistPPGWGAssists: Kris Letang, Sidney Crosby · Tip-in, 0.02 xG2–0
  3. P1 15:04PITKris LetangAssists: Paul Martin, Sidney Crosby · Slap, 0.04 xG3–0
  4. P2 4:56PITPatric HornqvistPPAssists: Chris Kunitz, Sidney Crosby · Snap, 0.12 xG4–0
  5. P2 14:01PITRobert BortuzzoAssists: Sidney Crosby, Chris Kunitz · Wrist, 0.14 xG5–0
  6. P2 16:52BUFZemgus GirgensonsAssists: Josh Gorges, Brian Gionta · Tip-in, 0.07 xG5–1
  7. P2 19:15PITEvgeni MalkinAssists: Blake Comeau, Kris Letang · Wrist, 0.37 xG6–1
Penalties (12)
  1. P1 3:04BUFDrew Stafford: High sticking2 min · PPG
  2. P1 11:17BUFTyler Myers: Slashing2 min
  3. P1 19:27PITEvgeni Malkin: Hooking2 min
  4. P2 4:27BUFDrew Stafford: Slashing2 min · PPG
  5. P2 7:15BUFTyson Strachan: Roughing2 min
  6. P2 7:15PITPatric Hornqvist: Roughing2 min
  7. P2 12:35BUFMike Weber: Fighting5 min
  8. P2 12:35PITSteve Downie: Fighting5 min
  9. P2 14:43PITSimon Despres: Tripping2 min
  10. P3 0:42BUFNikita Zadorov: Interference goalkeeper2 min
  11. P3 2:00BUFMike Weber: Hooking2 min
  12. P3 6:45PITBlake Comeau: Slashing2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

PIT00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0BUF
46% to win54% to win
← PIT attackBUF attack →
  1. P1 20:00McCormick won the faceoff against Malkin
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

PITBUF
39Shots on goal21
3.8Expected goals1.6
54Shot attempts40
19Faceoffs won26
5Power plays3
13Penalty minutes17
18Hits36
10Blocked shots3
2Giveaways9
4Takeaways4

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Pittsburgh Penguins

Forward lines

  1. bestKunitz – Crosby – Hornqvist8:16

    xG 0.80–0.29 (74%)attempts 11–5goals 3–0

  2. Downie – Sutter – Spaling5:55

    xG 0.11–0.01 (94%)attempts 4–1goals 0–0

  3. Adams – Goc – Sill2:04

    xG 0.15–0.09 (65%)attempts 2–2goals 0–0

  4. Dupuis – Malkin – Comeau9:17

    xG 0.39–0.34 (53%)attempts 6–7goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestMartin – Letang12:32

    xG 0.77–0.15 (84%)attempts 9–5goals 3–0

  2. Ehrhoff – Bortuzzo12:25

    xG 0.73–0.25 (74%)attempts 14–6goals 1–0

  3. Scuderi – Despres15:43

    xG 0.70–0.53 (57%)attempts 12–15goals 0–0

Buffalo Sabres

Forward lines

  1. bestMcCormick – Larsson – Flynn6:20

    xG 0.19–0.07 (72%)attempts 4–3goals 0–0

  2. Gionta – Moulson – Girgensons9:16

    xG 0.22–0.22 (50%)attempts 8–6goals 0–1

  3. Stafford – Hodgson – Deslauriers7:11

    xG 0.09–0.64 (12%)attempts 3–9goals 0–0

  4. Mitchell – Stewart – Ennis10:27

    xG 0.13–0.94 (12%)attempts 3–16goals 0–2

Defence pairs

  1. Ristolainen – Zadorov14:31

    xG 0.27–0.44 (38%)attempts 12–10goals 0–0

  2. Strachan – Weber15:22

    xG 0.10–0.57 (15%)attempts 7–15goals 0–0

  3. Gorges – Myers10:52

    xG 0.63–1.11 (36%)attempts 11–13goals 1–3

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

BUF 1.6 xGPIT 3.8 xG
01234P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

BUFPIT

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

BUF's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line BUF is favoured, below it PIT. Dots are goals.

Excitement 13/100 · #1019 of 1230 this seasonSwing 0.63 · 4 goals in reachComeback index 46% (winner's lowest chance)
PIT 100%5050%50BUF 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +17 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Pittsburgh Penguins win this game 84% of the time.

BUF winsPIT wins

Simulated goal difference (BUF − PIT), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).