Skip to content
Ice Lab

Fri, Nov 14, 2014·Rogers Arena, Vancouver

Arizona Coyotes 5, Vancouver Canucks 0

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Arizona Coyotes win this game 51% of the time.

VAN winsARI wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
ARI13310110523
VAN012011012035

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 14:56ARIMartin HanzalGWGAssists: Keith Yandle, Connor Murphy · Wrist, 0.08 xG1–0
  2. P2 15:25ARIMartin HanzalAssists: Tobias Rieder, Martin Erat · Deflected, 0.12 xG2–0
  3. P2 15:34ARIMartin HanzalAssists: Martin Erat, Zbynek Michalek · Wrist, 0.10 xG3–0
  4. P2 19:57ARIShane DoanAssists: Sam Gagner, Keith Yandle · Snap, 0.11 xG4–0
  5. P3 17:37ARIKeith YandlePPAssists: Mikkel Boedker, Sam Gagner · Slap, 0.04 xG5–0
Penalties (11)
  1. P1 4:46ARIMichael Stone: Tripping2 min
  2. P1 9:53VANRyan Stanton: Hooking2 min
  3. P2 2:52VANDerek Dorsett: Roughing2 min
  4. P2 2:52ARIB.J. Crombeen: Roughing2 min
  5. P2 15:34VANNick Bonino: Unsportsmanlike conduct2 min
  6. P3 0:18ARIOliver Ekman-Larsson: Tripping2 min
  7. P3 15:05ARIBrandon Gormley: Holding2 min
  8. P3 15:37VANLinden Vey: Holding2 min · PPG
  9. P3 17:12VANAlexandre Burrows: Slashing2 min
  10. P3 19:23VANDerek Dorsett: Fighting5 min
  11. P3 19:23ARIB.J. Crombeen: Fighting5 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

ARI00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0VAN
46% to win54% to win
← ARI attackVAN attack →
  1. P1 20:00Vermette won the faceoff against Sedin
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

ARIVAN
23Shots on goal35
2.1Expected goals2.0
42Shot attempts70
37Faceoffs won31
4Power plays3
13Penalty minutes15
21Hits24
23Blocked shots8
6Giveaways11
4Takeaways4

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Arizona Coyotes

Forward lines

  1. bestCrombeen – Vitale – McMillan7:03

    xG 0.39–0.04 (90%)attempts 5–4goals 0–0

  2. Erat – Hanzal – Rieder10:09

    xG 0.42–0.18 (70%)attempts 10–10goals 3–0

  3. Doan – Klinkhammer – Gagner9:13

    xG 0.37–0.23 (62%)attempts 11–7goals 1–0

  4. Vermette – Korpikoski – Boedker12:35

    xG 0.16–0.46 (25%)attempts 5–15goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestYandle – Murphy12:48

    xG 0.45–0.28 (62%)attempts 12–14goals 2–0

  2. Stone – Gormley13:09

    xG 0.41–0.46 (47%)attempts 7–16goals 0–0

  3. Michalek – Ekman-Larsson18:25

    xG 0.40–0.51 (44%)attempts 8–19goals 2–0

Vancouver Canucks

Forward lines

  1. bestRichardson – Matthias – Jensen10:07

    xG 0.39–0.08 (82%)attempts 12–5goals 0–0

  2. Sedin – Sedin – Vrbata10:18

    xG 0.30–0.04 (89%)attempts 11–3goals 0–0

  3. Higgins – Burrows – Bonino9:48

    xG 0.32–0.46 (41%)attempts 10–12goals 0–2

  4. Hansen – Dorsett – Vey8:56

    xG 0.03–0.40 (7%)attempts 3–7goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestHamhuis – Bieksa6:29

    xG 0.18–0.03 (86%)attempts 8–2goals 0–0

  2. Edler – Tanev15:06

    xG 0.44–0.35 (56%)attempts 17–9goals 0–1

  3. Hamhuis – Tanev2:38

    xG 0.06–0.02 (75%)attempts 2–2goals 0–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

VAN 2.0 xGARI 2.1 xG
00.511.52P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

VANARI

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

VAN's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line VAN is favoured, below it ARI. Dots are goals.

Excitement 7/100 · #1131 of 1230 this seasonSwing 0.68 · 3 goals in reachComeback index 45% (winner's lowest chance)
ARI 100%5050%50VAN 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +18 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Arizona Coyotes win this game 51% of the time.

VAN winsARI wins

Simulated goal difference (VAN − ARI), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).