Skip to content
Ice Lab

Fri, Dec 5, 2014·Xcel Energy Center, St. Paul

Anaheim Ducks 5, Minnesota Wild 4

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Anaheim Ducks win this game 51% of the time.

MIN winsANA wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
ANA271826521
MIN04311110425

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 1:31ANARyan KeslerAssists: Kyle Palmieri, Cam Fowler · Snap, 0.06 xG1–0
  2. P1 11:44ANAJakob SilfverbergAssists: Andrew Cogliano, Devante Smith-Pelly · Wrist, 0.13 xG2–0
  3. P2 2:28ANARyan KeslerAssists: Hampus Lindholm, Tim Jackman · Wrist, 0.03 xG3–0
  4. P2 4:59MINMikko KoivuPPAssists: Mikael Granlund, Marco Scandella · Deflected, 0.07 xG3–1
  5. P2 5:10MINZach ParisePPAssists: Mikael Granlund, Jonas Brodin · Snap, 0.05 xG3–2
  6. P2 17:49MINJonas BrodinAssists: Jason Pominville, Zach Parise · Wrist, 0.01 xG3–3
  7. P3 2:07MINJustin FontaineAssists: Kyle Brodziak, Nate Prosser · Slap, 0.02 xG3–4
  8. P3 3:37ANATim JackmanAssists: Ryan Kesler · Wrist, 0.04 xG4–4
  9. P3 8:28ANAMatt BeleskeyGWGAssists: Ryan Getzlaf, Kyle Palmieri · Wrist, 0.09 xG5–4
Penalties (10)
  1. P1 9:26MINJason Zucker: Unsportsmanlike conduct2 min
  2. P1 11:28ANANate Thompson: Fighting5 min
  3. P1 11:28MINKeith Ballard: Fighting5 min
  4. P1 12:10ANAJosh Manson: Cross checking2 min
  5. P2 3:57ANARyan Getzlaf: Delaying game puck over glass2 min · PPG
  6. P2 4:25ANARyan Kesler: High sticking2 min · PPG
  7. P2 15:31MINZach Parise: Holding2 min
  8. P2 18:47ANAJosh Manson: Hooking2 min
  9. P2 19:49MINJustin Fontaine: Too many men on the ice2 min
  10. P3 19:19MINZach Parise: Tripping2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

ANA00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0MIN
46% to win54% to win
← ANA attackMIN attack →
  1. P1 20:00Granlund won the faceoff against Smith-Pelly
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

ANAMIN
21Shots on goal25
1.7Expected goals1.6
47Shot attempts52
26Faceoffs won38
4Power plays4
13Penalty minutes13
24Hits14
16Blocked shots12
4Giveaways3
4Takeaways7

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Anaheim Ducks

Forward lines

  1. bestCogliano – Silfverberg – Smith-Pelly2:42

    xG 0.33–0.08 (79%)attempts 5–1goals 1–0

  2. Jackman – Thompson – Maroon4:17

    xG 0.25–0.03 (89%)attempts 8–2goals 0–0

  3. Kesler – Beleskey – Palmieri5:33

    xG 0.22–0.08 (73%)attempts 6–4goals 1–0

  4. Getzlaf – Perry – Bourque2:06

    xG 0.06–0.00 (100%)attempts 3–0goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestStoner – Vatanen14:29

    xG 0.51–0.32 (61%)attempts 11–13goals 1–0

  2. Fowler – Manson15:03

    xG 0.50–0.34 (60%)attempts 14–8goals 2–0

  3. Fistric – Lindholm14:51

    xG 0.20–0.46 (30%)attempts 12–15goals 2–2

Minnesota Wild

Forward lines

  1. bestKoivu – Zucker – Coyle12:21

    xG 0.54–0.27 (66%)attempts 10–8goals 0–1

  2. Carter – Haula – Fontaine7:22

    xG 0.23–0.11 (69%)attempts 8–3goals 0–0

  3. Pominville – Parise – Granlund12:05

    xG 0.17–0.38 (31%)attempts 9–9goals 1–1

  4. Vanek – Brodziak – Niederreiter9:40

    xG 0.10–0.40 (20%)attempts 6–10goals 0–1

Defence pairs

  1. bestBrodin – Folin16:41

    xG 0.43–0.14 (75%)attempts 16–3goals 1–0

  2. Scandella – Spurgeon16:06

    xG 0.60–0.48 (56%)attempts 13–10goals 0–2

  3. Spurgeon – Brodin2:34

    xG 0.09–0.02 (83%)attempts 4–1goals 0–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

MIN 1.6 xGANA 1.7 xG
00.511.5P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

MINANA

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

MIN's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line MIN is favoured, below it ANA. Dots are goals.

Excitement 98/100 · #26 of 1230 this seasonSwing 2.28 · 9 goals in reach · 3-goal lead cutComeback index 21% (winner's lowest chance)
ANA 100%5050%50MIN 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +31 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Anaheim Ducks win this game 51% of the time.

MIN winsANA wins

Simulated goal difference (MIN − ANA), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).