Skip to content
Ice Lab

Sat, Dec 13, 2014·Gila River Arena, Glendale

Minnesota Wild 4, Arizona Coyotes 3 (SO)

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Minnesota Wild win this game 52% of the time.

ARI winsMIN wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3OTSOTotal
MIN110111111032435
ARI1721308021330

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 2:48MINNino NiederreiterPPAssists: Ryan Suter, Thomas Vanek · Tip-in, 0.15 xG1–0
  2. P1 3:52ARIOliver Ekman-LarssonPPAssists: Mikkel Boedker, Antoine Vermette · Slap, 0.05 xG1–1
  3. P2 1:40ARIAntoine VermetteAssists: Oliver Ekman-Larsson, Mikkel Boedker · Wrist, 0.06 xG1–2
  4. P2 13:25MINJason ZuckerAssists: Jason Pominville, Mikko Koivu · Backhand, 0.12 xG2–2
  5. P2 19:32ARILauri KorpikoskiAssists: Kyle Chipchura · Wrist, 0.18 xG2–3
  6. P3 14:07MINZach ParisePPAssists: Jason Pominville, Ryan Suter · Wrist, 0.21 xG3–3

Shootout

  1. 1. ARI Mikkel Boedker stopped
  2. 2. MIN Zach Parise scored
  3. 3. ARI Antoine Vermette scored
  4. 4. MIN Mikko Koivu scored
  5. 5. ARI Tobias Rieder stopped
Penalties (8)
  1. P1 1:51ARIJoe Vitale: Holding2 min · PPG
  2. P1 3:27MINMikko Koivu: Slashing2 min · PPG
  3. P2 8:31MINRyan Suter: High sticking2 min
  4. P2 8:31ARIMartin Hanzal: Slashing2 min
  5. P2 14:30MINNate Prosser: Slashing2 min
  6. P3 1:58ARIJoe Vitale: Holding2 min
  7. P3 11:31MINCharlie Coyle: Holding2 min
  8. P3 13:04ARIMartin Hanzal: Interference goalkeeper2 min · PPG

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

MIN00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0ARI
46% to win54% to win
← MIN attackARI attack →
  1. P1 20:00Hanzal won the faceoff against Koivu
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

MINARI
35Shots on goal30
2.5Expected goals2.3
69Shot attempts80
25Faceoffs won34
3Power plays3
8Penalty minutes8
28Hits40
28Blocked shots21
3Giveaways3
5Takeaways5

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Minnesota Wild

Forward lines

  1. bestCoyle – Niederreiter – Fontaine8:12

    xG 0.25–0.19 (56%)attempts 11–9goals 0–0

  2. Vanek – Parise – Granlund12:37

    xG 0.49–0.47 (51%)attempts 14–14goals 0–2

  3. Brodziak – Haula – Niederreiter2:13

    xG 0.00–0.11 (0%)attempts 0–6goals 0–0

  4. Koivu – Pominville – Zucker12:58

    xG 0.36–0.51 (42%)attempts 13–11goals 1–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestFalk – Folin8:15

    xG 0.48–0.16 (76%)attempts 13–11goals 1–0

  2. Prosser – Brodin3:17

    xG 0.08–0.03 (72%)attempts 4–3goals 0–0

  3. Falk – Prosser2:52

    xG 0.23–0.24 (48%)attempts 5–5goals 0–0

Arizona Coyotes

Forward lines

  1. bestMoss – Chipchura – Korpikoski9:03

    xG 0.47–0.26 (65%)attempts 16–10goals 1–0

  2. Doan – Vermette – Boedker12:34

    xG 0.52–0.51 (50%)attempts 16–9goals 1–0

  3. Crombeen – Vitale – McMillan2:17

    xG 0.00–0.02 (0%)attempts 0–2goals 0–0

  4. Erat – Hanzal – Rieder13:15

    xG 0.42–0.56 (43%)attempts 12–16goals 0–1

Defence pairs

  1. bestYandle – Schlemko16:26

    xG 0.67–0.42 (62%)attempts 20–15goals 0–1

  2. Summers – Stone12:34

    xG 0.45–0.37 (55%)attempts 17–14goals 0–0

  3. Michalek – Ekman-Larsson16:20

    xG 0.41–0.71 (37%)attempts 17–17goals 1–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

ARI 2.3 xGMIN 2.5 xG
00.511.522.5P1P2P3OTEndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

ARIMIN

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

ARI's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line ARI is favoured, below it MIN. Dots are goals.

Excitement 84/100 · #176 of 1230 this seasonSwing 2.24 · 6 goals in reachComeback index 12% (winner's lowest chance)
MIN 100%5050%50ARI 100%P1P2P3OTEndBiggest swing +35 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Minnesota Wild win this game 52% of the time.

ARI winsMIN wins

Simulated goal difference (ARI − MIN), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).