Skip to content
Ice Lab

Mon, Dec 22, 2014·BB&T Center, Sunrise

Pittsburgh Penguins 3, Florida Panthers 4 (SO)

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Florida Panthers win this game 54% of the time.

FLA winsPIT wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3OTSOTotal
PIT180728040327
FLA09113212031437

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 4:39PITPatric HornqvistAssists: Simon Despres, Sidney Crosby · Tip-in, 0.11 xG1–0
  2. P2 19:23FLAJussi JokinenAssists: Dave Bolland, Dmitry Kulikov · Snap, 0.07 xG1–1
  3. P3 0:22FLAJimmy HayesAssists: Sean Bergenheim · Wrist, 0.08 xG1–2
  4. P3 4:55FLAJimmy HayesAssists: Sean Bergenheim, Aleksander Barkov · Tip-in, 0.15 xG1–3
  5. P3 15:08PITNick SpalingPPAssists: Derrick Pouliot, Simon Despres · Tip-in, 0.11 xG2–3
  6. P3 16:50PITEvgeni MalkinUnassisted · Wrist, 0.38 xG3–3

Shootout

  1. 1. PIT Evgeni Malkin stopped
  2. 2. FLA Brandon Pirri stopped
  3. 3. PIT Sidney Crosby stopped
  4. 4. FLA Vincent Trocheck stopped
  5. 5. PIT Kris Letang stopped
  6. 6. FLA Nick Bjugstad stopped
  7. 7. PIT Chris Kunitz stopped
  8. 8. FLA Jonathan Huberdeau stopped
  9. 9. PIT Patric Hornqvist stopped
  10. 10. FLA Jussi Jokinen stopped
  11. 11. PIT Derrick Pouliot stopped
  12. 12. FLA Dave Bolland stopped
  13. 13. PIT Simon Despres stopped
  14. 14. FLA Aleksander Barkov scored
Penalties (7)
  1. P1 9:53FLADylan Olsen: Interference2 min
  2. P2 0:27PITEvgeni Malkin: Tripping2 min
  3. P2 3:13PITBlake Comeau: Interference2 min
  4. P2 9:27FLAAaron Ekblad: High sticking2 min
  5. P2 17:20PITSimon Despres: Slashing2 min
  6. P3 7:24FLABrandon Pirri: Slashing2 min
  7. P3 13:13FLADerek MacKenzie: Slashing2 min · PPG

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

PIT00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0FLA
46% to win54% to win
← PIT attackFLA attack →
  1. P1 20:00Malkin won the faceoff against Bjugstad
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

PITFLA
27Shots on goal37
2.6Expected goals2.8
53Shot attempts62
40Faceoffs won31
4Power plays3
6Penalty minutes8
42Hits46
13Blocked shots13
3Giveaways3
5Takeaways8

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Pittsburgh Penguins

Forward lines

  1. bestMalkin – Comeau – Spaling9:50

    xG 0.45–0.30 (60%)attempts 16–8goals 0–1

  2. Kunitz – Crosby – Hornqvist11:02

    xG 0.22–0.18 (55%)attempts 5–11goals 1–0

  3. Ebbett – Rust – Farnham2:48

    xG 0.02–0.12 (16%)attempts 1–2goals 0–0

  4. Goc – Ebbett – Klinkhammer3:52

    xG 0.00–0.24 (0%)attempts 1–6goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestLetang – Harrington9:39

    xG 1.33–0.41 (76%)attempts 19–9goals 1–1

  2. Chorney – Letang3:41

    xG 0.24–0.04 (87%)attempts 5–3goals 0–0

  3. Despres – Dumoulin10:31

    xG 0.15–0.24 (39%)attempts 4–7goals 1–0

Florida Panthers

Forward lines

  1. bestBergenheim – Hayes – Barkov11:55

    xG 0.90–0.19 (82%)attempts 11–7goals 2–0

  2. Jokinen – Bolland – Pirri7:22

    xG 0.24–0.18 (58%)attempts 10–5goals 0–1

  3. Bjugstad – Trocheck – Huberdeau10:34

    xG 0.36–0.32 (53%)attempts 11–8goals 0–0

  4. MacKenzie – Kopecky – Pirri2:08

    xG 0.00–0.00attempts 0–0goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestCampbell – Ekblad15:45

    xG 1.07–0.49 (69%)attempts 14–16goals 2–0

  2. Olsen – Gudbranson13:48

    xG 0.44–0.32 (58%)attempts 14–11goals 0–0

  3. Mitchell – Kulikov12:13

    xG 0.21–0.22 (48%)attempts 10–5goals 0–1

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

FLA 2.8 xGPIT 2.6 xG
-0.500.511.522.53P1P2P3OTEndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

FLAPIT

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

FLA's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line FLA is favoured, below it PIT. Dots are goals.

Excitement 88/100 · #123 of 1230 this seasonSwing 2.22 · 6 goals in reach · 2-goal lead cutComeback index 28% (winner's lowest chance)
PIT 100%5050%50FLA 100%P1P2P3OTEndBiggest swing +42 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Florida Panthers win this game 54% of the time.

FLA winsPIT wins

Simulated goal difference (FLA − PIT), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).