Skip to content
Ice Lab

Left wing · #23

Sean Bergenheim

Age
42
Shoots
Left
Height
180 cm
Weight
91 kg
Born
Helsinki, FIN
Draft
2002, round 1, #22 (NYI)

Career · 5 seasons

Games
323
Goals
66
Points
123
TOI per game
14:48
xGF% (5v5)
55.8%
Goals above expected
−14.0

Season by season

The regular-season line for each season, with the total, by team for traded players.

2009–10NYI63101323+114:041337.5%012.7–
2010–11TBL80141529013:591827.7%417.860.1%
2011–12FLA6217623−516:251859.2%519.754.2%
After a break: 2013–14FLA62161329−1616:301908.4%419.355.0%
2014–15FLA3981018+214:09849.5%28.353.8%
2014–15MIN17101−410:45244.2%02.351.5%
2014–15All teams5691019−213:071088.3%210.653.3%
Total4 teams3236657123−2214:487988.3%1580.055.8%

Form

Rolling averages smooth out single games so the trend shows.

Form, ten-game rolling

Points and individual expected goals per game (left scale), averaged over the previous ten games. Ice time is on the second chart.

Points per gameixG per gameTOI per game (minutes)
00.20.40.60.8150100150200250300
8m10m12m14m16m18m20m50100150200250300Game

Player card

How 5 seasons compares with everyone else at the position over the same seasons, and the players with the most similar profile.

Overall rating

2nd line

71st percentile among qualified forwards, blending scoring 40%, play-driving 40%, usage 20%.

  1. 1st line
  2. 2nd line
  3. 3rd line
  4. 4th line
  5. Extra / AHL

Scoring

3rd line
  • Goals /600.8372nd pct
  • Assists /600.7231st pct
  • ixG /601.0091st pct
  • Goals above expected−14.03rd pct

Play-driving

1st line
  • xGF% (5v5)55.8%95th pct
  • CF% (5v5)54.5%91st pct
  • Relative xGF%+5.293rd pct
  • Penalty diff /600.0141st pct

Usage

2nd line
  • TOI per game14:4858th pct
  • PP time share23.2%55th pct
  • Offensive zone starts53.5%40th pct
  • Quality of competition24.4%62nd pct

Percentiles among forwards with 200+ minutes at 5-on-5 and 20+ games. Ratings rank each column's average percentile among the same players and read it as a role on a depth chart (how).

Faceoffs

How often Bergenheim wins the draw over 5 seasons, against whom and where, and what a win leads to. Ranked among players with 1017+ draws over the same seasons.

Win rate

41.6%

37–52 · below the 1017 draws of a regular

Against an average centre

40.9%

Opponents won 49.3% of their draws; an average centre would have won 50.7% against them.

Wins above average

−8

Draws won beyond what an average centre facing the same opponents would have won.

Draws per game

1.3

89 draws in all.

By dot, attacking to the right

40%5 · 0.041%17 · +1.113%15 · +0.233%3 · −2.417%6 · 0.044%9 · +1.043%7 · +4.762%21 · +6.467%6 · +3.3Attacking zone →← Defending zone

Win rate at each dot; the small numbers are draws and the xG swing (×100) of winning rather than losing there.

By zone

  • Offensive zone29.0% 9–22
  • Neutral zone36.7% 11–19
  • Defensive zone60.7% 17–11

By strength

  • Even strength35.3% 18–33
  • Power play45.5% 5–6
  • Shorthanded48.0% 12–13

What a win leads to

Shot attempts in the next 20 seconds, for minus against, per 100 draws: +22 after a win, −15 after a loss. Each win was worth 2.6 expected goals per 100 draws more than a loss.

Most-faced opponents

Season by season

SeasonDrawsWin rateAgainst average
2009–101729.4%29.6%
2010–115149.0%48.0%
2011–121127.3%26.1%
2013–14450.0%49.1%
2014–15633.3%33.8%

Finishing

Did the goals match the chances?

Goals against expected goals

Cumulative goals (solid) and individual xG (dashed) through the season. The gap is finishing: above the dashed line, the player scored more than an average shooter would from the same chances.

−14.0 goals above expected

02040608050100150200250300Game

Goals above expected, everyone at the same position with 20+ games

−40−200+20+40+60+80+100