Skip to content
Ice Lab

Sat, Dec 27, 2014·Xcel Energy Center, St. Paul

Winnipeg Jets 4, Minnesota Wild 3 (OT)

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Minnesota Wild win this game 69% of the time.

MIN winsWPG wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3OTTotal
WPG07182711423
MIN18082801325

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 16:03MINMikael GranlundAssists: Jason Pominville · Wrist, 0.14 xG0–1
  2. P2 7:17WPGBryan LittleAssists: Andrew Ladd, Grant Clitsome · Backhand, 0.02 xG1–1
  3. P3 1:52WPGAdam LowryAssists: Evander Kane, Matt Halischuk · Backhand, 0.26 xG2–1
  4. P3 10:38MINJason PominvilleAssists: Stu Bickel, Mikael Granlund · Slap, 0.02 xG2–2
  5. P3 12:09WPGBlake WheelerSHAssists: Evander Kane, Dustin Byfuglien · Deflected, 0.12 xG3–2
  6. P3 12:41MINThomas VanekPPAssists: Jared Spurgeon, Marco Scandella · Deflected, 0.09 xG3–3
  7. OT 2:47WPGAndrew LaddGWGAssists: Bryan Little · Wrist, 0.07 xG4–3
Penalties (10)
  1. P1 5:48WPGChris Thorburn: Fighting5 min
  2. P1 5:48MINStu Bickel: Fighting5 min
  3. P1 5:48MINRyan Carter: Tripping2 min
  4. P1 7:53MINRyan Carter: Interference2 min
  5. P1 10:27WPGAdam Pardy: Interference2 min
  6. P1 18:20WPGAnthony Peluso: Cross checking2 min
  7. P3 7:10WPGDustin Byfuglien: Interference2 min
  8. P3 11:09WPGAndrew Ladd: Holding2 min · PPG
  9. P3 14:59MINMarco Scandella: Tripping2 min
  10. P3 16:43WPGPaul Postma: Tripping2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

WPG00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0MIN
46% to win54% to win
← WPG attackMIN attack →
  1. P1 20:00Koivu won the faceoff against Little
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

WPGMIN
23Shots on goal25
1.8Expected goals2.8
52Shot attempts54
32Faceoffs won33
3Power plays5
15Penalty minutes11
19Hits13
14Blocked shots18
4Giveaways6
3Takeaways6

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Winnipeg Jets

Forward lines

  1. bestHalischuk – Kane – Lowry10:26

    xG 0.65–0.22 (74%)attempts 12–5goals 1–0

  2. Thorburn – Slater – Peluso3:29

    xG 0.01–0.02 (38%)attempts 2–2goals 0–0

  3. Frolik – Perreault – Scheifele11:44

    xG 0.32–0.39 (45%)attempts 13–9goals 0–1

  4. Ladd – Wheeler – Little11:26

    xG 0.16–0.24 (40%)attempts 11–12goals 1–1

Defence pairs

  1. bestPardy – Postma9:28

    xG 0.68–0.20 (78%)attempts 15–3goals 1–0

  2. Byfuglien – Chiarot12:51

    xG 0.32–0.32 (50%)attempts 10–9goals 0–2

  3. Harrison – Clitsome15:49

    xG 0.17–0.39 (30%)attempts 13–17goals 1–0

Minnesota Wild

Forward lines

  1. bestKoivu – Coyle – Niederreiter10:33

    xG 0.23–0.14 (61%)attempts 13–9goals 0–1

  2. Pominville – Parise – Granlund10:00

    xG 0.31–0.29 (52%)attempts 9–10goals 2–0

  3. Brodziak – Carter – Fontaine4:22

    xG 0.09–0.16 (36%)attempts 2–4goals 0–0

  4. Cooke – Vanek – Haula7:01

    xG 0.22–0.46 (33%)attempts 4–8goals 0–1

Defence pairs

  1. bestSuter – Spurgeon4:08

    xG 0.30–0.05 (84%)attempts 7–2goals 1–0

  2. Suter – Brodin12:54

    xG 0.27–0.14 (66%)attempts 12–11goals 0–1

  3. Scandella – Spurgeon15:11

    xG 0.38–0.31 (55%)attempts 10–11goals 0–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

MIN 2.8 xGWPG 1.8 xG
-0.500.511.522.53P1P2P3OTEndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

MINWPG

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

MIN's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line MIN is favoured, below it WPG. Dots are goals.

Excitement 94/100 · #56 of 1230 this seasonSwing 2.78 · 7 goals in reachComeback index 26% (winner's lowest chance)
WPG 100%5050%50MIN 100%P1P2P3OTEndBiggest swing +34 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Minnesota Wild win this game 69% of the time.

MIN winsWPG wins

Simulated goal difference (MIN − WPG), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).