Sat, Jan 17, 2015·TD Garden, Boston
Columbus Blue Jackets 3, Boston Bruins 1
Expected result
Based on shot quality alone, Columbus Blue Jackets win this game 52% of the time.
By period
Goals and shots on goal in each period.
| Team | P1 | P2 | P3 | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CBJ | 19 | 08 | 214 | 331 |
| BOS | 113 | 08 | 014 | 135 |
Goals, with shots on goal in grey.
Scoring
Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.
- P1 7:57CBJRyan JohansenPPAssists: Jack Johnson, Scott Hartnell · Snap, 0.05 xG1–0
- P1 11:34BOSCarl SoderbergAssists: Loui Eriksson, Chris Kelly · Slap, 0.09 xG1–1
- P3 16:57CBJMatt CalvertGWGAssists: Cam Atkinson, Brandon Dubinsky · Backhand, 0.11 xG2–1
- P3 19:22CBJMatt CalvertENAssists: Ryan Johansen, James Wisniewski · Wrist, 0.58 xG3–1
Penalties (5)
- P1 7:27BOSDougie Hamilton: Hooking2 min · PPG
- P1 16:56BOSDougie Hamilton: Interference2 min
- P1 19:28CBJScott Hartnell: Tripping2 min
- P2 8:29CBJNick Foligno: Hooking2 min
- P2 12:06BOSChris Kelly: Roughing2 min
Replay
Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.
20:00
P1
- P1 20:00Soderberg won the faceoff against Dubinsky
- Goal
- Shot
- Miss
- Block
- Hit
- Takeaway
- Giveaway
- Faceoff
- Penalty
The numbers
Team totals, side by side.
Line combinations that worked
Model-basedEach team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.
Columbus Blue Jackets
Forward lines
- bestHartnell – Dubinsky – Anderson11:59
xG 0.29–0.21 (58%)attempts 13–7goals 0–1
- Calvert – Atkinson – Wennberg8:23
xG 0.13–0.11 (52%)attempts 4–4goals 0–0
- Boll – Letestu – Tropp5:36
xG 0.07–0.20 (26%)attempts 5–5goals 0–0
- Foligno – Morin – Johansen12:41
xG 0.43–0.81 (34%)attempts 11–22goals 0–0
Defence pairs
- bestTyutin – Prout13:47
xG 0.64–0.30 (68%)attempts 12–16goals 0–1
- Johnson – Savard17:53
xG 0.27–0.77 (26%)attempts 13–17goals 0–0
- Wisniewski – Connauton16:27
xG 0.62–1.26 (33%)attempts 14–23goals 1–0
Boston Bruins
Forward lines
- bestPaille – Bergeron – Smith7:31
xG 0.88–0.01 (99%)attempts 19–3goals 0–0
- Kelly – Eriksson – Soderberg12:48
xG 0.60–0.24 (71%)attempts 12–12goals 1–0
- Krejci – Lucic – Pastrnak11:44
xG 0.62–0.49 (56%)attempts 15–9goals 0–0
- Paille – Caron – Cunningham2:12
xG 0.01–0.02 (33%)attempts 1–2goals 0–0
Defence pairs
- bestMiller – Krug11:58
xG 0.67–0.22 (75%)attempts 15–12goals 0–0
- Chara – Hamilton13:59
xG 0.80–0.46 (64%)attempts 24–8goals 0–0
- Seidenberg – McQuaid17:45
xG 0.86–0.57 (60%)attempts 16–18goals 1–0
How the game flowed
Model-basedChance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.
Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.
Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute
Win probability
Model-basedHow each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.
BOS's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line BOS is favoured, below it CBJ. Dots are goals.
Did the better team win?
Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.
Based on shot quality alone, Columbus Blue Jackets win this game 52% of the time.
Simulated goal difference (BOS − CBJ), 10,000 replays
The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).