Skip to content
Ice Lab

Sat, Jan 17, 2015·First Niagara Center, Buffalo

Philadelphia Flyers 4, Buffalo Sabres 3

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Philadelphia Flyers win this game 56% of the time.

BUF winsPHI wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
PHI07212213432
BUF1818111327

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 18:51BUFZemgus GirgensonsAssists: Chris Stewart, Brian Flynn · Snap, 0.05 xG0–1
  2. P2 3:51PHIR.J. UmbergerPPAssists: Matt Read, Michael Del Zotto · Slap, 0.26 xG1–1
  3. P2 7:49PHIMark StreitPPAssists: Claude Giroux, Jakub Voracek · Slap, 0.06 xG2–1
  4. P2 19:05BUFTyler EnnisAssists: Matt Moulson, Rasmus Ristolainen · Backhand, 0.27 xG2–2
  5. P3 5:54PHIChris VandeVeldeAssists: Vincent Lecavalier, Carlo Colaiacovo · Wrist, 0.18 xG3–2
  6. P3 8:39PHIMichael RafflGWGAssists: Michael Del Zotto, Luke Schenn · Wrist, 0.34 xG4–2
  7. P3 18:51BUFZemgus GirgensonsPPAssists: Matt Moulson, Chris Stewart · Backhand, 0.12 xG4–3
Penalties (8)
  1. P1 10:18PHIMichael Raffl: Interference2 min
  2. P2 2:04BUFZemgus Girgensons: Holding2 min · PPG
  3. P2 6:30BUFChris Stewart: Interference2 min · PPG
  4. P2 6:30BUFChris Stewart: Roughing2 min
  5. P2 6:30PHISean Couturier: Roughing2 min
  6. P2 11:03BUFPhil Varone: Hooking2 min
  7. P2 15:33PHIZac Rinaldo: Interference2 min
  8. P3 17:34PHIVincent Lecavalier: Holding the stick2 min · PPG

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

PHI00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0BUF
46% to win54% to win
← PHI attackBUF attack →
  1. P1 20:00Mitchell won the faceoff against Raffl
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

PHIBUF
32Shots on goal27
2.6Expected goals2.2
63Shot attempts44
34Faceoffs won38
3Power plays3
8Penalty minutes8
19Hits21
8Blocked shots15
2Giveaways4
0Takeaways4

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Philadelphia Flyers

Forward lines

  1. bestSimmonds – Rinaldo – Raffl10:19

    xG 0.46–0.07 (87%)attempts 10–4goals 1–0

  2. Lecavalier – VandeVelde – Bellemare7:24

    xG 0.43–0.12 (78%)attempts 8–2goals 1–0

  3. Umberger – Read – Couturier11:40

    xG 0.29–0.22 (57%)attempts 12–9goals 0–0

  4. Giroux – Voracek – Schenn10:55

    xG 0.28–0.49 (36%)attempts 9–8goals 0–2

Defence pairs

  1. bestColaiacovo – MacDonald13:24

    xG 0.63–0.09 (87%)attempts 16–3goals 1–0

  2. Schenn – Del Zotto16:15

    xG 0.59–0.64 (48%)attempts 19–10goals 1–0

  3. Streit – Schultz13:45

    xG 0.40–0.66 (38%)attempts 11–14goals 0–2

Buffalo Sabres

Forward lines

  1. bestMoulson – Mitchell – Ennis14:27

    xG 0.82–0.42 (66%)attempts 14–13goals 1–0

  2. Stafford – Hodgson – Varone5:17

    xG 0.17–0.15 (53%)attempts 2–9goals 0–0

  3. Ellis – Kaleta – Deslauriers9:11

    xG 0.08–0.31 (21%)attempts 3–9goals 0–1

  4. Stewart – Flynn – Girgensons13:46

    xG 0.26–0.84 (23%)attempts 8–18goals 1–1

Defence pairs

  1. bestGorges – Myers18:38

    xG 0.67–0.26 (72%)attempts 14–12goals 1–0

  2. Benoit – Strachan9:41

    xG 0.16–0.26 (38%)attempts 7–11goals 0–0

  3. Ristolainen – Zadorov14:11

    xG 0.48–0.93 (34%)attempts 9–21goals 1–2

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

BUF 2.2 xGPHI 2.6 xG
00.511.522.5P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

BUFPHI

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

BUF's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line BUF is favoured, below it PHI. Dots are goals.

Excitement 59/100 · #453 of 1230 this seasonSwing 1.65 · 7 goals in reachComeback index 27% (winner's lowest chance)
PHI 100%5050%50BUF 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +27 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Philadelphia Flyers win this game 56% of the time.

BUF winsPHI wins

Simulated goal difference (BUF − PHI), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).