Skip to content
Ice Lab

Sun, Jan 18, 2015·Joe Louis Arena, Detroit

Buffalo Sabres 4, Detroit Red Wings 6

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Buffalo Sabres win this game 50% of the time.

DET winsBUF wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
BUF380116415
DET0539312626

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 1:46BUFDrew StaffordAssists: Cody Hodgson, Andrej Meszaros · Wrist, 0.09 xG1–0
  2. P1 10:21BUFTyler EnnisAssists: Nikita Zadorov, Andre Benoit · Deflected, 0.02 xG2–0
  3. P1 13:37BUFChris StewartPPAssists: Tyler Ennis, Nikita Zadorov · Slap, 0.07 xG3–0
  4. P2 1:00DETGustav NyquistPPAssists: Henrik Zetterberg, Niklas Kronwall · Deflected, 0.15 xG3–1
  5. P2 4:07DETDrew MillerAssists: Joakim Andersson, Danny DeKeyser · Slap, 0.29 xG3–2
  6. P2 10:08DETTomas TatarUnassisted · Wrist, 0.10 xG3–3
  7. P3 1:59DETHenrik ZetterbergAssists: Pavel Datsyuk, Tomas Tatar · Backhand, 0.25 xG3–4
  8. P3 5:05DETHenrik ZetterbergPPGWGAssists: Gustav Nyquist, Justin Abdelkader · Wrist, 0.22 xG3–5
  9. P3 8:31BUFTyler EnnisAssists: Matt Moulson · Wrist, 0.17 xG4–5
  10. P3 11:59DETHenrik ZetterbergAssists: Kyle Quincey, Danny DeKeyser · Wrist, 0.03 xG4–6
Penalties (7)
  1. P1 13:25DETKyle Quincey: Tripping2 min · PPG
  2. P2 0:49BUFTyler Myers: Roughing2 min · PPG
  3. P2 17:33DETJonathan Ericsson: Hooking2 min
  4. P3 3:26BUFJosh Gorges: Tripping2 min · PPG
  5. P3 10:57BUFAndrej Meszaros: Slashing2 min
  6. P3 11:09DETStephen Weiss: Holding2 min
  7. P3 15:00BUFChris Stewart: Too many men on the ice2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

BUF00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0DET
46% to win54% to win
← BUF attackDET attack →
  1. P1 20:00Mitchell won the faceoff against Datsyuk
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

BUFDET
15Shots on goal26
2.1Expected goals2.1
32Shot attempts55
30Faceoffs won29
3Power plays4
8Penalty minutes6
24Hits17
22Blocked shots4
2Giveaways7
2Takeaways2

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Buffalo Sabres

Forward lines

  1. bestMoulson – Mitchell – Ennis13:20

    xG 0.80–0.28 (74%)attempts 8–12goals 2–0

  2. Stafford – Deslauriers – Varone4:16

    xG 0.21–0.02 (92%)attempts 4–2goals 0–0

  3. Stafford – Hodgson – Varone7:21

    xG 0.13–0.05 (72%)attempts 3–4goals 1–0

  4. Ellis – Kaleta – Deslauriers4:10

    xG 0.08–0.15 (35%)attempts 2–3goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestBenoit – Strachan8:44

    xG 0.44–0.15 (75%)attempts 8–7goals 0–0

  2. Gorges – Myers20:47

    xG 0.60–0.41 (59%)attempts 8–19goals 0–1

  3. Meszaros – Zadorov13:55

    xG 0.58–0.57 (50%)attempts 7–10goals 2–1

Detroit Red Wings

Forward lines

  1. bestZetterberg – Abdelkader – Pulkkinen7:35

    xG 0.27–0.13 (67%)attempts 7–3goals 0–0

  2. Miller – Andersson – Glendening6:58

    xG 0.36–0.27 (57%)attempts 6–6goals 1–1

  3. Datsyuk – Abdelkader – Tatar2:46

    xG 0.02–0.00 (100%)attempts 4–0goals 0–0

  4. Zetterberg – Nyquist – Sheahan2:47

    xG 0.00–0.00attempts 1–1goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestQuincey – DeKeyser16:19

    xG 0.66–0.31 (68%)attempts 19–5goals 1–0

  2. Ericsson – Ouellet7:43

    xG 0.15–0.01 (91%)attempts 4–2goals 1–0

  3. Kronwall – Ericsson5:25

    xG 0.10–0.13 (44%)attempts 4–3goals 0–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

DET 2.1 xGBUF 2.1 xG
00.511.52P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

DETBUF

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

DET's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line DET is favoured, below it BUF. Dots are goals.

Excitement 95/100 · #54 of 1230 this seasonSwing 1.78 · 10 goals in reach · 3-goal lead cutComeback index 9% (winner's lowest chance)
BUF 100%5050%50DET 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +27 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Buffalo Sabres win this game 50% of the time.

DET winsBUF wins

Simulated goal difference (DET − BUF), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).