Skip to content
Ice Lab

Tue, Feb 3, 2015·Honda Center, Anaheim

Carolina Hurricanes 4, Anaheim Ducks 5 (OT)

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Carolina Hurricanes win this game 66% of the time.

ANA winsCAR wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3OTTotal
CAR0321221700432
ANA0132112512531

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P2 0:37ANACorey PerryAssists: Ryan Getzlaf · Snap, 0.20 xG0–1
  2. P2 9:24CARAlexander SeminAssists: Victor Rask, John-Michael Liles · Snap, 0.02 xG1–1
  3. P2 11:41CARJay McClementAssists: Elias Lindholm, Andrej Sekera · Snap, 0.11 xG2–1
  4. P2 14:21ANARyan KeslerPPAssists: Hampus Lindholm, Kyle Palmieri · Tip-in, 0.16 xG2–2
  5. P3 4:01CARBrad MaloneUnassisted · Wrist, 0.37 xG3–2
  6. P3 5:10CARJordan StaalAssists: Eric Staal · Wrist, 0.28 xG4–2
  7. P3 9:31ANADevante Smith-PellyAssists: Jakob Silfverberg, Ben Lovejoy · Tip-in, 0.15 xG4–3
  8. P3 15:52ANACorey PerryAssists: Ryan Kesler, Sami Vatanen · Wrist, 0.15 xG4–4
  9. OT 0:45ANARyan GetzlafGWGAssists: Corey Perry, Francois Beauchemin · Snap, 0.15 xG4–5
Penalties (9)
  1. P1 18:02CARRyan Murphy: Hooking2 min
  2. P2 12:54CARJiri Tlusty: Holding2 min · PPG
  3. P2 16:10CARJiri Tlusty: Tripping2 min
  4. P3 0:17ANARyan Getzlaf: Interference2 min
  5. P3 0:17ANAMatt Beleskey: Hooking2 min
  6. P3 4:01ANACam Fowler: Penalty shot hooking on breakaway0 min
  7. P3 12:43ANABen Lovejoy: Holding2 min
  8. P3 13:00ANAEric Brewer: Cross checking2 min
  9. P3 13:27CARJeff Skinner: Tripping2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

CAR00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0ANA
46% to win54% to win
← CAR attackANA attack →
  1. P1 20:00McClement won the faceoff against Getzlaf
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

CARANA
32Shots on goal31
3.7Expected goals2.8
47Shot attempts51
24Faceoffs won28
4Power plays4
8Penalty minutes8
16Hits25
9Blocked shots5
5Giveaways2
3Takeaways2

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Carolina Hurricanes

Forward lines

  1. bestMcClement – Dwyer – Malone11:44

    xG 0.38–0.22 (64%)attempts 8–11goals 0–0

  2. Staal – Staal – Lindholm13:12

    xG 0.91–0.80 (53%)attempts 17–16goals 1–1

  3. Semin – Tlusty – Rask10:30

    xG 0.21–0.23 (48%)attempts 3–5goals 1–0

  4. Gerbe – Nash – Skinner8:08

    xG 0.10–0.25 (28%)attempts 2–4goals 0–1

Defence pairs

  1. bestLiles – Gleason12:36

    xG 0.88–0.10 (90%)attempts 10–3goals 2–0

  2. Hainsey – Faulk2:06

    xG 0.21–0.09 (70%)attempts 1–3goals 0–0

  3. Hainsey – Murphy14:40

    xG 0.36–0.61 (37%)attempts 9–14goals 0–2

Anaheim Ducks

Forward lines

  1. bestGetzlaf – Perry – Beleskey10:52

    xG 0.82–0.51 (62%)attempts 13–12goals 1–1

  2. Jackman – Thompson – Smith-Pelly7:14

    xG 0.10–0.04 (73%)attempts 6–2goals 0–0

  3. Thompson – Cogliano – Silfverberg2:08

    xG 0.02–0.03 (45%)attempts 1–2goals 0–0

  4. Cogliano – Silfverberg – Rakell6:53

    xG 0.01–0.21 (6%)attempts 2–2goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. Beauchemin – Lindholm16:30

    xG 0.54–0.55 (50%)attempts 12–11goals 0–0

  2. Brewer – Vatanen15:49

    xG 0.51–0.54 (49%)attempts 12–12goals 1–2

  3. Lovejoy – Fowler14:01

    xG 0.19–0.34 (36%)attempts 11–7goals 0–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

ANA 2.8 xGCAR 3.7 xG
01234P1P2P3OTEndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

ANACAR

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

ANA's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line ANA is favoured, below it CAR. Dots are goals.

Excitement 98/100 · #27 of 1230 this seasonSwing 2.65 · 9 goals in reach · 2-goal lead cutComeback index 6% (winner's lowest chance)
CAR 100%5050%50ANA 100%P1P2P3OTEndBiggest swing +36 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Carolina Hurricanes win this game 66% of the time.

ANA winsCAR wins

Simulated goal difference (ANA − CAR), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).