Skip to content
Ice Lab

Mon, Feb 9, 2015·Xcel Energy Center, St. Paul

Vancouver Canucks 3, Minnesota Wild 5

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Minnesota Wild win this game 58% of the time.

MIN winsVAN wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
VAN1101718325
MIN311210011532

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 5:05MINJordan SchroederAssists: Charlie Coyle, Mathew Dumba · Backhand, 0.04 xG0–1
  2. P1 7:37MINJason PominvillePPAssists: Thomas Vanek, Mikko Koivu · Snap, 0.11 xG0–2
  3. P1 10:18VANZack KassianAssists: Chris Higgins, Dan Hamhuis · Snap, 0.02 xG1–2
  4. P1 15:37MINNino NiederreiterAssists: Mikko Koivu, Ryan Suter · Snap, 0.13 xG1–3
  5. P2 1:11VANShawn MatthiasAssists: Radim Vrbata, Dan Hamhuis · Wrist, 0.16 xG2–3
  6. P2 7:05MINRyan SuterPPGWGAssists: Mikko Koivu, Zach Parise · Slap, 0.05 xG2–4
  7. P2 7:59MINKyle BrodziakAssists: Jared Spurgeon, Jonas Brodin · Snap, 0.06 xG2–5
  8. P3 17:57VANRyan StantonAssists: Daniel Sedin, Henrik Sedin · Tip-in, 0.09 xG3–5
Penalties (12)
  1. P1 6:32MINKyle Brodziak: Fighting5 min
  2. P1 6:32VANDerek Dorsett: Fighting5 min · PPG
  3. P1 6:42VANAlexandre Burrows: Holding2 min
  4. P1 10:18VANLuca Sbisa: Roughing2 min
  5. P1 10:18MINNate Prosser: Roughing2 min
  6. P1 12:20VANNick Bonino: Hooking2 min
  7. P2 6:31VANAlexander Edler: Hooking2 min · PPG
  8. P2 18:29VANAlexandre Burrows: Roughing2 min
  9. P2 18:29MINMarco Scandella: Roughing2 min
  10. P3 16:11MINJordan Schroeder: Too many men on the ice2 min
  11. P3 16:49VANRadim Vrbata: Tripping2 min
  12. P3 19:39VANAlexander Edler: Interference goalkeeper2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

VAN00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0MIN
46% to win54% to win
← VAN attackMIN attack →
  1. P1 20:00Sedin won the faceoff against Koivu
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

VANMIN
25Shots on goal32
2.2Expected goals2.6
54Shot attempts55
24Faceoffs won40
1Power plays5
19Penalty minutes11
13Hits16
14Blocked shots11
8Giveaways10
3Takeaways10

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Vancouver Canucks

Forward lines

  1. bestVrbata – Matthias – Bonino3:53

    xG 0.27–0.00 (100%)attempts 6–1goals 1–0

  2. Vrbata – Matthias – Vey2:26

    xG 0.19–0.01 (93%)attempts 4–2goals 0–0

  3. Higgins – Kassian – Vey10:12

    xG 0.09–0.27 (26%)attempts 6–9goals 1–1

  4. Hansen – Dorsett – Horvat9:19

    xG 0.15–0.34 (31%)attempts 4–10goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestEdler – Tanev14:02

    xG 0.65–0.20 (76%)attempts 16–10goals 0–1

  2. Hamhuis – Sbisa17:59

    xG 0.65–0.48 (58%)attempts 21–11goals 1–0

  3. Stanton – Tanev2:21

    xG 0.11–0.06 (65%)attempts 2–1goals 0–1

Minnesota Wild

Forward lines

  1. bestKoivu – Pominville – Niederreiter9:16

    xG 0.57–0.26 (69%)attempts 11–5goals 1–0

  2. Brodziak – Schroeder – Haula3:03

    xG 0.12–0.00 (97%)attempts 4–2goals 1–0

  3. Schroeder – Coyle – Niederreiter2:24

    xG 0.06–0.00 (100%)attempts 3–0goals 1–0

  4. Brodziak – Haula – Coyle4:43

    xG 0.09–0.06 (61%)attempts 3–5goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestSuter – Dumba3:30

    xG 0.61–0.10 (86%)attempts 5–4goals 0–0

  2. Prosser – Dumba8:29

    xG 0.21–0.29 (43%)attempts 7–9goals 1–1

  3. Suter – Brodin14:54

    xG 0.38–0.55 (41%)attempts 9–18goals 1–1

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

MIN 2.6 xGVAN 2.2 xG
00.511.522.5P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

MINVAN

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

MIN's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line MIN is favoured, below it VAN. Dots are goals.

Excitement 66/100 · #370 of 1230 this seasonSwing 1.03 · 8 goals in reachComeback index 54% (winner's lowest chance)
VAN 100%5050%50MIN 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +17 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Minnesota Wild win this game 58% of the time.

MIN winsVAN wins

Simulated goal difference (MIN − VAN), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).