Skip to content
Ice Lab

Tue, Feb 10, 2015·BB&T Center, Sunrise

Anaheim Ducks 2, Florida Panthers 6

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Florida Panthers win this game 58% of the time.

FLA winsANA wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
ANA011210012233
FLA25310111626

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 5:31FLADmitry KulikovPPAssists: Brian Campbell, Dave Bolland · Slap, 0.04 xG0–1
  2. P1 12:20FLANick BjugstadPPAssists: Jimmy Hayes, Jonathan Huberdeau · Wrist, 0.04 xG0–2
  3. P2 5:37FLAAaron EkbladGWGAssists: Jonathan Huberdeau, Brian Campbell · Slap, 0.04 xG0–3
  4. P2 7:23ANAKyle PalmieriPPAssists: Rickard Rakell, Cam Fowler · Slap, 0.15 xG1–3
  5. P2 12:50FLAAleksander BarkovAssists: Brad Boyes, Jonathan Huberdeau · Backhand, 0.09 xG1–4
  6. P2 13:12FLADave BollandAssists: Tomas Fleischmann, Erik Gudbranson · Slap, 0.18 xG1–5
  7. P2 14:54ANATim JackmanAssists: Clayton Stoner, Sami Vatanen · Backhand, 0.00 xG2–5
  8. P3 12:44FLAJimmy HayesPPAssists: Steven Kampfer, Erik Gudbranson · Snap, 0.17 xG2–6
Penalties (13)
  1. P1 3:47ANACorey Perry: Tripping2 min · PPG
  2. P1 6:46ANATim Jackman: Fighting5 min
  3. P1 6:46FLAShawn Thornton: Fighting5 min
  4. P1 9:57ANAMatt Beleskey: Hooking2 min
  5. P1 10:35ANAKyle Palmieri: Too many men on the ice2 min · PPG
  6. P1 17:58FLAErik Gudbranson: Hooking2 min
  7. P2 5:57FLANick Bjugstad: Hooking2 min · PPG
  8. P2 5:57FLASteven Kampfer: Holding2 min
  9. P2 15:02ANABen Lovejoy: Holding the stick2 min
  10. P3 6:24ANAKyle Palmieri: Elbowing2 min
  11. P3 10:51ANAPatrick Maroon: High sticking double minor4 min · PPG
  12. P3 13:52ANAFrancois Beauchemin: Unsportsmanlike conduct2 min
  13. P3 13:52ANAFrancois Beauchemin: Misconduct10 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

ANA00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0FLA
46% to win54% to win
← ANA attackFLA attack →
  1. P1 20:00Bolland won the faceoff against Getzlaf
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

ANAFLA
33Shots on goal26
2.2Expected goals2.6
62Shot attempts43
39Faceoffs won24
3Power plays8
31Penalty minutes11
39Hits22
5Blocked shots17
4Giveaways5
3Takeaways6

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Anaheim Ducks

Forward lines

  1. bestJackman – Thompson – Cogliano3:11

    xG 0.45–0.18 (72%)attempts 6–4goals 1–1

  2. Kesler – Beleskey – Palmieri9:02

    xG 0.43–0.17 (72%)attempts 15–3goals 0–0

  3. Bourque – Smith-Pelly – Rakell6:46

    xG 0.20–0.04 (82%)attempts 8–1goals 0–1

  4. Getzlaf – Perry – Maroon9:22

    xG 0.12–0.46 (20%)attempts 8–6goals 0–1

Defence pairs

  1. bestStoner – Vatanen14:12

    xG 0.88–0.27 (77%)attempts 23–5goals 1–0

  2. Brewer – Lovejoy12:42

    xG 0.47–0.80 (37%)attempts 14–11goals 0–3

  3. Beauchemin – Fowler13:50

    xG 0.13–0.54 (19%)attempts 9–10goals 0–0

Florida Panthers

Forward lines

  1. bestThornton – MacKenzie – Jokinen3:20

    xG 0.18–0.03 (87%)attempts 3–4goals 0–0

  2. Boyes – Huberdeau – Barkov6:45

    xG 0.21–0.10 (67%)attempts 5–8goals 2–1

  3. Fleischmann – Bergenheim – Bolland8:48

    xG 0.49–0.42 (54%)attempts 5–6goals 1–0

  4. Jokinen – Hayes – Bjugstad7:49

    xG 0.14–0.22 (40%)attempts 5–9goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestKampfer – Petrovic10:29

    xG 0.56–0.25 (70%)attempts 9–8goals 0–0

  2. Kulikov – Gudbranson10:51

    xG 0.62–0.32 (66%)attempts 6–11goals 1–0

  3. Campbell – Ekblad14:06

    xG 0.31–0.69 (31%)attempts 9–20goals 2–1

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

FLA 2.6 xGANA 2.2 xG
00.511.522.5P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

FLAANA

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

FLA's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line FLA is favoured, below it ANA. Dots are goals.

Excitement 41/100 · #670 of 1230 this seasonSwing 0.79 · 6 goals in reachComeback index 53% (winner's lowest chance)
ANA 100%5050%50FLA 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +17 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Florida Panthers win this game 58% of the time.

FLA winsANA wins

Simulated goal difference (FLA − ANA), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).