Skip to content
Ice Lab

Sat, Feb 14, 2015·Xcel Energy Center, St. Paul

Carolina Hurricanes 3, Minnesota Wild 6

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Minnesota Wild win this game 67% of the time.

MIN winsCAR wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
CAR1721307327
MIN3131427624

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 1:15MINThomas VanekAssists: Mikael Granlund, Justin Fontaine · Wrist, 0.13 xG0–1
  2. P1 8:17MINThomas VanekAssists: Justin Fontaine, Ryan Suter · Wrist, 0.11 xG0–2
  3. P1 15:31MINJordan SchroederAssists: Marco Scandella, Jared Spurgeon · Wrist, 0.05 xG0–3
  4. P1 19:49CARAndrej NestrasilAssists: Jay McClement, Justin Faulk · Wrist, 0.15 xG1–3
  5. P2 2:16MINNate ProsserGWGAssists: Thomas Vanek, Mikael Granlund · Deflected, 0.08 xG1–4
  6. P2 5:02CARJeff SkinnerAssists: Jordan Staal, Michal Jordan · Slap, 0.11 xG2–4
  7. P2 6:32CARElias LindholmAssists: Justin Faulk, Jay McClement · Tip-in, 0.05 xG3–4
  8. P3 3:15MINErik HaulaAssists: Kyle Brodziak, Stephane Veilleux · Deflected, 0.11 xG3–5
  9. P3 18:11MINZach PariseENAssists: Jared Spurgeon, Mikko Koivu · Wrist, 0.56 xG3–6
Penalties (6)
  1. P1 3:23MINMarco Scandella: Interference2 min
  2. P1 16:36CARJordan Staal: Tripping2 min
  3. P2 3:36CARAndrej Sekera: Cross checking2 min
  4. P2 3:36MINMikko Koivu: Embellishment2 min
  5. P2 8:03MINNino Niederreiter: High sticking double minor4 min
  6. P3 7:51CARNathan Gerbe: Slashing2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

CAR00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0MIN
46% to win54% to win
← CAR attackMIN attack →
  1. P1 20:00Staal won the faceoff against Koivu
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

CARMIN
27Shots on goal24
1.7Expected goals2.6
71Shot attempts39
31Faceoffs won29
3Power plays2
6Penalty minutes8
6Hits12
6Blocked shots26
7Giveaways7
1Takeaways8

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Carolina Hurricanes

Forward lines

  1. bestMcClement – Dwyer – Nestrasil7:41

    xG 0.16–0.05 (76%)attempts 8–4goals 0–0

  2. Staal – Tlusty – Staal14:35

    xG 0.48–0.46 (51%)attempts 21–7goals 0–1

  3. Semin – Gerbe – Nash6:59

    xG 0.07–0.26 (22%)attempts 5–4goals 0–2

  4. Skinner – Rask – Lindholm6:52

    xG 0.19–0.47 (28%)attempts 7–7goals 0–1

Defence pairs

  1. bestHainsey – Jordan13:04

    xG 0.33–0.08 (81%)attempts 13–5goals 0–0

  2. Liles – Gleason11:35

    xG 0.21–0.43 (33%)attempts 8–7goals 0–2

  3. Sekera – Faulk16:45

    xG 0.62–0.94 (39%)attempts 25–15goals 2–2

Minnesota Wild

Forward lines

  1. bestKoivu – Pominville – Parise12:35

    xG 0.51–0.37 (58%)attempts 12–13goals 0–1

  2. Schroeder – Coyle – Niederreiter10:17

    xG 0.46–0.33 (58%)attempts 6–7goals 1–0

  3. Vanek – Granlund – Fontaine10:49

    xG 0.27–0.29 (49%)attempts 5–12goals 2–0

  4. Veilleux – Brodziak – Haula8:22

    xG 0.11–0.16 (41%)attempts 2–13goals 1–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestScandella – Spurgeon13:00

    xG 0.71–0.34 (68%)attempts 14–10goals 1–0

  2. Suter – Brodin16:39

    xG 0.57–0.26 (69%)attempts 9–19goals 3–0

  3. Scandella – Dumba3:13

    xG 0.00–0.09 (0%)attempts 0–2goals 0–1

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

MIN 2.6 xGCAR 1.7 xG
00.511.522.5P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

MINCAR

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

MIN's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line MIN is favoured, below it CAR. Dots are goals.

Excitement 81/100 · #202 of 1230 this seasonSwing 1.12 · 9 goals in reach · 2-goal lead cutComeback index 54% (winner's lowest chance)
CAR 100%5050%50MIN 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +17 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Minnesota Wild win this game 67% of the time.

MIN winsCAR wins

Simulated goal difference (MIN − CAR), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).