Skip to content
Ice Lab

Mon, Feb 16, 2015·Canadian Tire Centre, Ottawa

Carolina Hurricanes 6, Ottawa Senators 3

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Ottawa Senators win this game 62% of the time.

OTT winsCAR wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
CAR11231925636
OTT110210012332

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 6:49CARAndrej NestrasilAssists: Nathan Gerbe · Backhand, 0.04 xG1–0
  2. P1 18:15OTTErik CondraAssists: Erik Karlsson, Shane Prince · Wrist, 0.15 xG1–1
  3. P2 8:06CARJeff SkinnerPPAssists: Riley Nash, Andrej Sekera · Wrist, 0.19 xG2–1
  4. P2 10:52OTTMike HoffmanAssists: Mika Zibanejad, Erik Karlsson · Tip-in, 0.13 xG2–2
  5. P2 13:26CARNathan GerbeAssists: Andrej Nestrasil, Michal Jordan · Slap, 0.02 xG3–2
  6. P2 13:58OTTCody CeciAssists: Mika Zibanejad, Bobby Ryan · Wrist, 0.25 xG3–3
  7. P2 19:06CARJay McClementGWGAssists: Brad Malone, Patrick Dwyer · Snap, 0.03 xG4–3
  8. P3 2:33CARMichal JordanPPAssists: Elias Lindholm, Justin Faulk · Snap, 0.13 xG5–3
  9. P3 9:49CARChris TerryPPAssists: Ron Hainsey, Andrej Nestrasil · Slap, 0.05 xG6–3
Penalties (8)
  1. P1 18:40OTTMika Zibanejad: Holding2 min
  2. P2 6:02OTTPatrick Wiercioch: Hooking2 min
  3. P2 7:11OTTJared Cowen: High sticking2 min · PPG
  4. P3 1:56OTTEric Gryba: High sticking2 min · PPG
  5. P3 6:10CARJordan Staal: Tripping2 min
  6. P3 9:16OTTMarc Methot: Holding2 min · PPG
  7. P3 18:47CARPatrick Dwyer: Tripping2 min
  8. P3 19:31CARRiley Nash: Hooking2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

CAR00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0OTT
46% to win54% to win
← CAR attackOTT attack →
  1. P1 20:00Staal won the faceoff against Zibanejad
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

CAROTT
36Shots on goal32
2.6Expected goals3.3
56Shot attempts66
32Faceoffs won26
5Power plays3
6Penalty minutes10
21Hits24
17Blocked shots13
4Giveaways4
5Takeaways10

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Carolina Hurricanes

Forward lines

  1. bestGerbe – Terry – Nestrasil10:42

    xG 0.36–0.25 (59%)attempts 11–8goals 2–0

  2. Staal – Tlusty – Staal11:47

    xG 0.69–0.68 (50%)attempts 14–16goals 0–1

  3. Nash – Skinner – Lindholm10:32

    xG 0.31–0.64 (33%)attempts 9–12goals 0–1

  4. McClement – Dwyer – Malone10:02

    xG 0.18–0.53 (26%)attempts 5–14goals 1–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestGleason – Jordan14:03

    xG 0.42–0.32 (57%)attempts 16–14goals 1–0

  2. Sekera – Faulk20:40

    xG 0.59–1.32 (31%)attempts 15–27goals 0–1

  3. Hainsey – Bellemore14:20

    xG 0.53–1.36 (28%)attempts 9–16goals 1–2

Ottawa Senators

Forward lines

  1. bestMacArthur – Chiasson – Lazar8:22

    xG 0.92–0.38 (71%)attempts 12–7goals 0–1

  2. Legwand – Condra – Prince7:25

    xG 0.59–0.07 (89%)attempts 10–2goals 1–0

  3. Ryan – Hoffman – Zibanejad11:00

    xG 1.08–0.68 (61%)attempts 18–12goals 2–0

  4. Michalek – Turris – Stone12:39

    xG 0.34–0.29 (54%)attempts 11–13goals 0–2

Defence pairs

  1. bestWiercioch – Ceci14:24

    xG 1.44–0.71 (67%)attempts 28–10goals 1–1

  2. Methot – Karlsson14:34

    xG 1.03–0.35 (75%)attempts 16–14goals 2–0

  3. Karlsson – Wiercioch2:51

    xG 0.02–0.05 (34%)attempts 1–2goals 0–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

OTT 3.3 xGCAR 2.6 xG
01234P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

OTTCAR

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

OTT's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line OTT is favoured, below it CAR. Dots are goals.

Excitement 82/100 · #187 of 1230 this seasonSwing 1.87 · 9 goals in reachComeback index 46% (winner's lowest chance)
CAR 100%5050%50OTT 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +23 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Ottawa Senators win this game 62% of the time.

OTT winsCAR wins

Simulated goal difference (OTT − CAR), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).