Skip to content
Ice Lab

Thu, Mar 26, 2015·First Niagara Center, Buffalo

Arizona Coyotes 4, Buffalo Sabres 3 (OT)

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Arizona Coyotes win this game 51% of the time.

BUF winsARI wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3OTTotal
ARI11221801111442
BUF11111011400335

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 7:55ARIJordan SzwarzAssists: Kyle Chipchura, Craig Cunningham · Snap, 0.06 xG1–0
  2. P1 10:49BUFTyler EnnisAssists: Matt Moulson, Johan Larsson · Backhand, 0.11 xG1–1
  3. P2 8:37BUFRasmus RistolainenPPAssists: Tyler Ennis, Brian Gionta · Slap, 0.05 xG1–2
  4. P2 11:29ARIOliver Ekman-LarssonAssists: Martin Erat, Mark Arcobello · Wrist, 0.03 xG2–2
  5. P2 14:20ARIDavid MossAssists: Sam Gagner · Tip-in, 0.06 xG3–2
  6. P3 16:23BUFBrian GiontaPPUnassisted · Slap, 0.20 xG3–3
  7. OT 0:56ARISam GagnerPPGWGAssists: Oliver Ekman-Larsson, John Moore · Slap, 0.20 xG4–3
Penalties (10)
  1. P1 14:57ARIB.J. Crombeen: Roughing2 min
  2. P1 15:14BUFMatt Moulson: Slashing2 min
  3. P1 18:04ARITye McGinn: Charging2 min
  4. P2 7:40ARIMichael Stone: Hooking2 min · PPG
  5. P2 9:26BUFJohan Larsson: Too many men on the ice2 min
  6. P2 15:51BUFNikita Zadorov: Holding2 min
  7. P3 0:59BUFMatt Moulson: Too many men on the ice2 min
  8. P3 4:29ARIConnor Murphy: Holding2 min
  9. P3 15:36ARIConnor Murphy: Interference2 min · PPG
  10. P3 19:30BUFMike Weber: Tripping2 min · PPG

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

ARI00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0BUF
46% to win54% to win
← ARI attackBUF attack →
  1. P1 20:00Larsson won the faceoff against Arcobello
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

ARIBUF
42Shots on goal35
2.9Expected goals2.8
70Shot attempts54
32Faceoffs won31
5Power plays5
10Penalty minutes10
14Hits15
10Blocked shots16
1Giveaways2
2Takeaways2

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Arizona Coyotes

Forward lines

  1. bestErat – Moss – Gagner8:21

    xG 0.46–0.15 (75%)attempts 12–3goals 1–0

  2. Crombeen – Vitale – McGinn8:30

    xG 0.24–0.35 (41%)attempts 9–11goals 0–0

  3. Doan – Arcobello – Rieder11:36

    xG 0.24–0.36 (41%)attempts 14–7goals 0–0

  4. Chipchura – Szwarz – Cunningham9:38

    xG 0.27–0.88 (23%)attempts 8–14goals 1–1

Defence pairs

  1. bestDahlbeck – Murphy12:13

    xG 0.45–0.31 (59%)attempts 14–12goals 1–0

  2. Moore – Gormley11:36

    xG 0.56–0.46 (55%)attempts 16–10goals 0–0

  3. Stone – Ekman-Larsson15:59

    xG 0.50–1.09 (31%)attempts 18–15goals 1–1

Buffalo Sabres

Forward lines

  1. bestGionta – Foligno – Grigorenko6:35

    xG 0.59–0.34 (63%)attempts 7–9goals 0–0

  2. Gionta – Moulson – Larsson5:06

    xG 0.38–0.14 (74%)attempts 8–5goals 0–0

  3. Hodgson – Foligno – Grigorenko4:36

    xG 0.23–0.00 (100%)attempts 4–1goals 0–0

  4. Hodgson – Dalpe – Varone2:31

    xG 0.03–0.08 (30%)attempts 2–3goals 0–1

Defence pairs

  1. bestWeber – Ristolainen12:06

    xG 0.47–0.26 (64%)attempts 9–13goals 1–0

  2. Meszaros – Bogosian2:19

    xG 0.10–0.02 (83%)attempts 3–1goals 0–0

  3. Benoit – Bogosian13:40

    xG 0.50–0.56 (47%)attempts 10–17goals 0–1

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

BUF 2.8 xGARI 2.9 xG
0123P1P2P3OTEndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

BUFARI

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

BUF's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line BUF is favoured, below it ARI. Dots are goals.

Excitement 93/100 · #64 of 1230 this seasonSwing 2.66 · 7 goals in reachComeback index 26% (winner's lowest chance)
ARI 100%5050%50BUF 100%P1P2P3OTEndBiggest swing +37 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Arizona Coyotes win this game 51% of the time.

BUF winsARI wins

Simulated goal difference (BUF − ARI), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).