Skip to content
Ice Lab

Sat, Mar 28, 2015·Scottrade Center, St. Louis

Columbus Blue Jackets 4, St. Louis Blues 2

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, St. Louis Blues win this game 64% of the time.

STL winsCBJ wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
CBJ172713417
STL0929013231

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 7:06CBJWilliam KarlssonAssists: Scott Hartnell, Marko Dano · Wrist, 0.06 xG1–0
  2. P2 0:52STLPatrik BerglundAssists: Jaden Schwartz, Jori Lehtera · Snap, 0.16 xG1–1
  3. P2 11:39CBJJack JohnsonPPAssists: Fedor Tyutin, Brandon Dubinsky · Slap, 0.06 xG2–1
  4. P2 14:44STLVladimir TarasenkoPPAssists: Patrik Berglund, Alex Pietrangelo · Wrist, 0.10 xG2–2
  5. P2 19:39CBJBoone JennerGWGAssists: Ryan Johansen, Cam Atkinson · Wrist, 0.12 xG3–2
  6. P3 18:42CBJCam AtkinsonENAssists: Boone Jenner, David Savard · Wrist, 0.64 xG4–2
Penalties (8)
  1. P1 10:05CBJCorey Tropp: Too many men on the ice2 min
  2. P1 12:48CBJSergei Bobrovsky: Delaying game puck over glass2 min
  3. P2 1:34STLPatrik Berglund: Hooking2 min
  4. P2 4:00CBJJack Johnson: Hooking2 min
  5. P2 7:55CBJDavid Savard: Delaying game puck over glass2 min
  6. P2 10:00STLJay Bouwmeester: Hooking2 min · PPG
  7. P2 13:48CBJJeremy Morin: Elbowing2 min · PPG
  8. P3 8:56CBJDavid Savard: Holding the stick2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

CBJ00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0STL
46% to win54% to win
← CBJ attackSTL attack →
  1. P1 20:00Stastny won the faceoff against Dubinsky
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

CBJSTL
17Shots on goal31
1.8Expected goals2.4
28Shot attempts55
30Faceoffs won30
2Power plays6
12Penalty minutes4
20Hits20
15Blocked shots5
1Giveaways8
4Takeaways7

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Columbus Blue Jackets

Forward lines

  1. bestAtkinson – Johansen – Jenner9:17

    xG 0.37–0.23 (61%)attempts 8–8goals 1–0

  2. Hartnell – Karlsson – Dano5:28

    xG 0.06–0.05 (55%)attempts 2–4goals 1–0

  3. Letestu – Tropp – Morin2:35

    xG 0.00–0.00attempts 0–0goals 0–0

  4. Hartnell – Morin – Karlsson3:45

    xG 0.03–0.05 (40%)attempts 1–4goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. Johnson – Savard14:28

    xG 0.26–0.39 (40%)attempts 6–16goals 1–0

  2. Goloubef – Connauton11:25

    xG 0.31–0.57 (36%)attempts 8–9goals 0–0

  3. Tyutin – Prout15:23

    xG 0.20–0.48 (30%)attempts 5–10goals 1–0

St. Louis Blues

Forward lines

  1. bestBackes – Porter – Reaves2:44

    xG 0.38–0.02 (94%)attempts 3–2goals 0–0

  2. Steen – Backes – Porter2:51

    xG 0.33–0.00 (100%)attempts 4–1goals 0–0

  3. Stastny – Berglund – Schwartz5:08

    xG 0.11–0.02 (82%)attempts 7–1goals 0–0

  4. Lehtera – Tarasenko – Jaskin5:09

    xG 0.09–0.03 (73%)attempts 5–2goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestMichalek – Bouwmeester14:01

    xG 0.83–0.10 (89%)attempts 14–6goals 1–0

  2. Shattenkirk – Pietrangelo4:04

    xG 0.17–0.03 (83%)attempts 8–1goals 0–0

  3. Gunnarsson – Pietrangelo11:24

    xG 0.49–0.39 (55%)attempts 9–8goals 0–1

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

STL 2.4 xGCBJ 1.8 xG
00.511.522.5P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

STLCBJ

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

STL's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line STL is favoured, below it CBJ. Dots are goals.

Excitement 57/100 · #482 of 1230 this seasonSwing 1.69 · 6 goals in reachComeback index 45% (winner's lowest chance)
CBJ 100%5050%50STL 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +24 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, St. Louis Blues win this game 64% of the time.

STL winsCBJ wins

Simulated goal difference (STL − CBJ), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).