Mon, Mar 30, 2015·United Center, Chicago
Los Angeles Kings 1, Chicago Blackhawks 4
Expected result
Based on shot quality alone, Chicago Blackhawks win this game 72% of the time.
By period
Goals and shots on goal in each period.
| Team | P1 | P2 | P3 | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LAK | 110 | 013 | 09 | 132 |
| CHI | 116 | 213 | 111 | 440 |
Goals, with shots on goal in grey.
Scoring
Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.
- P1 5:31CHIBryan BickellAssists: Brandon Saad, Andrew Shaw · Tip-in, 0.17 xG0–1
- P1 19:28LAKJake MuzzinAssists: Trevor Lewis, Nicholas Shore · Wrist, 0.01 xG1–1
- P2 1:37CHIDuncan KeithPPGWGAssists: Marian Hossa, Jonathan Toews · Slap, 0.06 xG1–2
- P2 2:41CHINiklas HjalmarssonUnassisted · Wrist, 0.06 xG1–3
- P3 13:06CHIMarian HossaUnassisted · Wrist, 0.02 xG1–4
Penalties (3)
- P1 13:35LAKRobyn Regehr: Hooking2 min
- P2 0:39LAKAndrej Sekera: Roughing2 min · PPG
- P2 7:12CHIMarcus Kruger: High sticking2 min
Replay
Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.
20:00
P1
- P1 20:00Carter won the faceoff against Richards
- Goal
- Shot
- Miss
- Block
- Hit
- Takeaway
- Giveaway
- Faceoff
- Penalty
The numbers
Team totals, side by side.
Line combinations that worked
Model-basedEach team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.
Los Angeles Kings
Forward lines
- bestBrown – Richards – Lewis2:52
xG 0.10–0.00 (100%)attempts 3–0goals 0–0
- Clifford – Nolan – Shore3:20
xG 0.08–0.00 (100%)attempts 1–0goals 0–0
- Gaborik – Williams – Kopitar12:40
xG 0.21–0.36 (37%)attempts 10–10goals 0–0
- Brown – Lewis – Shore7:43
xG 0.14–0.33 (29%)attempts 5–7goals 1–0
Defence pairs
- Regehr – Sekera11:44
xG 0.41–0.40 (50%)attempts 10–9goals 0–0
- Regehr – Martinez2:49
xG 0.05–0.06 (44%)attempts 2–2goals 0–0
- Muzzin – Doughty19:20
xG 0.37–0.51 (42%)attempts 16–15goals 1–0
Chicago Blackhawks
Forward lines
- bestDesjardins – Kruger – Teravainen12:09
xG 0.60–0.10 (86%)attempts 17–9goals 0–0
- Bickell – Shaw – Saad9:28
xG 0.42–0.21 (66%)attempts 7–8goals 1–0
- Hossa – Versteeg – Toews11:43
xG 0.27–0.23 (54%)attempts 11–10goals 1–0
- Richards – Vermette – Sharp14:06
xG 0.41–0.55 (43%)attempts 10–12goals 0–1
Defence pairs
- bestRozsival – Keith16:28
xG 0.76–0.26 (75%)attempts 18–11goals 0–0
- Oduya – Hjalmarsson17:57
xG 0.73–0.41 (64%)attempts 21–11goals 3–0
- Timonen – Seabrook10:41
xG 0.43–0.20 (68%)attempts 8–7goals 0–0
How the game flowed
Model-basedChance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.
Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.
Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute
Win probability
Model-basedHow each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.
CHI's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line CHI is favoured, below it LAK. Dots are goals.
Did the better team win?
Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.
Based on shot quality alone, Chicago Blackhawks win this game 72% of the time.
Simulated goal difference (CHI − LAK), 10,000 replays
The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).