Skip to content
Ice Lab

Thu, Apr 9, 2015·Rogers Arena, Vancouver

Arizona Coyotes 0, Vancouver Canucks 5

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Vancouver Canucks win this game 63% of the time.

VAN winsARI wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
ARI01105012028
VAN11031517532

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 16:22VANDaniel SedinGWGAssists: Henrik Sedin, Alexander Edler · Snap, 0.15 xG0–1
  2. P2 6:51VANRonalds KeninsAssists: Jannik Hansen, Bo Horvat · Wrist, 0.45 xG0–2
  3. P2 15:42VANYannick WeberPPAssists: Alexander Edler, Henrik Sedin · Slap, 0.01 xG0–3
  4. P2 17:10VANYannick WeberPPAssists: Daniel Sedin, Alexander Edler · Slap, 0.05 xG0–4
  5. P3 16:49VANDan HamhuisPPAssists: Chris Higgins, Nick Bonino · Wrist, 0.04 xG0–5
Penalties (10)
  1. P1 5:59ARIJoe Vitale: Tripping2 min
  2. P1 9:51VANAlexandre Burrows: Slashing2 min
  3. P2 1:15VANYannick Weber: Delaying game puck over glass2 min
  4. P2 13:44ARIKyle Chipchura: Holding2 min · PPG
  5. P2 15:32ARIAndrew Campbell: Closing hand on puck2 min · PPG
  6. P3 5:51VANDerek Dorsett: Slashing2 min
  7. P3 12:25VANDerek Dorsett: Boarding2 min
  8. P3 12:25ARITye McGinn: Roughing2 min
  9. P3 12:25VANDerek Dorsett: Roughing2 min
  10. P3 15:39ARIB.J. Crombeen: Elbowing2 min · PPG

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

ARI00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0VAN
46% to win54% to win
← ARI attackVAN attack →
  1. Press play, or drag along the timeline.
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

ARIVAN
28Shots on goal32
2.3Expected goals2.9
53Shot attempts56
31Faceoffs won24
4Power plays4
10Penalty minutes10
15Hits11
13Blocked shots14
6Giveaways12
5Takeaways7

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Arizona Coyotes

Forward lines

  1. bestArcobello – Rieder – Samuelsson8:20

    xG 0.93–0.13 (88%)attempts 13–10goals 0–0

  2. Crombeen – Vitale – McGinn9:09

    xG 0.08–0.07 (55%)attempts 7–3goals 0–0

  3. Chipchura – Szwarz – Cunningham10:40

    xG 0.50–0.57 (47%)attempts 9–12goals 0–1

  4. Erat – Moss – Gagner8:48

    xG 0.13–0.79 (14%)attempts 2–8goals 0–1

Defence pairs

  1. Stone – Ekman-Larsson19:59

    xG 0.80–0.86 (48%)attempts 18–19goals 0–0

  2. Moore – Murphy10:46

    xG 0.09–0.16 (37%)attempts 6–6goals 0–0

  3. Campbell – Dahlbeck11:31

    xG 0.51–0.85 (38%)attempts 8–15goals 0–2

Vancouver Canucks

Forward lines

  1. bestDorsett – Vey – Baertschi8:49

    xG 0.17–0.08 (68%)attempts 9–4goals 0–0

  2. Sedin – Sedin – Burrows8:37

    xG 0.36–0.30 (55%)attempts 12–5goals 1–0

  3. Vrbata – Higgins – Bonino8:31

    xG 0.36–0.38 (49%)attempts 8–4goals 0–0

  4. Hansen – Horvat – Kenins9:53

    xG 0.62–0.70 (47%)attempts 5–15goals 1–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestEdler – Tanev12:09

    xG 0.49–0.25 (66%)attempts 7–6goals 1–0

  2. Hamhuis – Weber10:48

    xG 0.46–0.27 (63%)attempts 15–7goals 0–0

  3. Hamhuis – Tanev3:13

    xG 0.03–0.00 (100%)attempts 1–1goals 0–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

VAN 2.9 xGARI 2.3 xG
0123P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

VANARI

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

VAN's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line VAN is favoured, below it ARI. Dots are goals.

Excitement 6/100 · #1149 of 1230 this seasonSwing 0.64 · 3 goals in reachComeback index 50% (winner's lowest chance)
ARI 100%5050%50VAN 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +19 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Vancouver Canucks win this game 63% of the time.

VAN winsARI wins

Simulated goal difference (VAN − ARI), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).