Skip to content
Ice Lab

Thu, Oct 8, 2015·Pepsi Center, Denver

Minnesota Wild 5, Colorado Avalanche 4

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Minnesota Wild win this game 62% of the time.

COL winsMIN wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
MIN09111410530
COL3111705423

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 13:40COLJarome IginlaPPAssists: Nathan MacKinnon, Tyson Barrie · Wrist, 0.06 xG0–1
  2. P1 17:24COLErik JohnsonPPAssists: Francois Beauchemin, Carl Soderberg · Slap, 0.03 xG0–2
  3. P1 18:55COLGabriel LandeskogAssists: Francois Beauchemin, Nathan MacKinnon · Wrist, 0.09 xG0–3
  4. P2 6:55MINZach PariseAssists: Mikael Granlund, Jason Pominville · Wrist, 0.07 xG1–3
  5. P2 8:07COLJohn MitchellAssists: Erik Johnson, Francois Beauchemin · Wrist, 0.31 xG1–4
  6. P3 5:07MINZach PariseAssists: Jason Pominville, Mathew Dumba · Wrist, 0.10 xG2–4
  7. P3 7:05MINNino NiederreiterAssists: Jason Zucker · Wrist, 0.09 xG3–4
  8. P3 9:18MINThomas VanekAssists: Mikael Granlund, Charlie Coyle · Snap, 0.04 xG4–4
  9. P3 10:14MINZach ParisePPGWGAssists: Ryan Suter, Mikko Koivu · Slap, 0.03 xG5–4
Penalties (6)
  1. P1 13:33MINJonas Brodin: Holding2 min · PPG
  2. P1 16:24MINMikko Koivu: Closing hand on puck2 min · PPG
  3. P1 19:39MINJason Zucker: Unsportsmanlike conduct2 min
  4. P1 19:39COLBlake Comeau: Roughing2 min
  5. P2 17:32COLGabriel Landeskog: Interference2 min
  6. P3 9:37COLGabriel Landeskog: Interference2 min · PPG

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

MIN00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0COL
47% to win54% to win
← MIN attackCOL attack →
  1. P1 20:00Duchene won the faceoff against Koivu
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

MINCOL
30Shots on goal23
2.4Expected goals1.8
75Shot attempts48
39Faceoffs won32
2Power plays2
6Penalty minutes6
16Hits25
12Blocked shots29
4Giveaways8
9Takeaways6

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Minnesota Wild

Forward lines

  1. bestPominville – Parise – Granlund14:35

    xG 0.50–0.32 (61%)attempts 21–11goals 2–0

  2. Koivu – Zucker – Niederreiter11:05

    xG 0.77–0.63 (55%)attempts 12–9goals 1–1

  3. Vanek – Coyle – Graovac11:46

    xG 0.25–0.26 (49%)attempts 14–10goals 0–1

  4. Porter – Carter – Haula6:18

    xG 0.09–0.16 (38%)attempts 8–5goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestSuter – Spurgeon21:22

    xG 1.04–0.45 (70%)attempts 30–16goals 0–0

  2. Scandella – Folin13:55

    xG 0.46–0.34 (57%)attempts 17–12goals 2–0

  3. Brodin – Dumba14:01

    xG 0.72–0.83 (46%)attempts 18–13goals 2–2

Colorado Avalanche

Forward lines

  1. bestMitchell – McLeod – Skille6:15

    xG 0.21–0.10 (69%)attempts 5–6goals 0–0

  2. Iginla – Comeau – Duchene14:44

    xG 0.29–0.26 (52%)attempts 15–11goals 0–1

  3. Tanguay – Landeskog – MacKinnon13:52

    xG 0.23–0.60 (28%)attempts 7–21goals 0–1

  4. Soderberg – Rendulic – Rantanen6:14

    xG 0.03–0.56 (5%)attempts 2–10goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestHolden – Zadorov17:37

    xG 0.54–0.25 (69%)attempts 14–13goals 0–1

  2. Holden – Barrie2:30

    xG 0.09–0.13 (40%)attempts 2–4goals 0–0

  3. Beauchemin – Johnson14:42

    xG 0.74–1.12 (40%)attempts 15–20goals 1–1

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

COL 1.8 xGMIN 2.4 xG
00.511.522.5P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

COLMIN

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

COL's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line COL is favoured, below it MIN. Dots are goals.

Excitement 92/100 · #92 of 1230 this seasonSwing 1.64 · 9 goals in reach · 3-goal lead cutComeback index 1% (winner's lowest chance)
MIN 100%5050%50COL 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +33 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Minnesota Wild win this game 62% of the time.

COL winsMIN wins

Simulated goal difference (COL − MIN), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).