Thu, Oct 22, 2015·Madison Square Garden, New York
Arizona Coyotes 1, New York Rangers 4
Expected result
Based on shot quality alone, New York Rangers win this game 52% of the time.
By period
Goals and shots on goal in each period.
| Team | P1 | P2 | P3 | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ARI | 15 | 014 | 016 | 135 |
| NYR | 06 | 110 | 312 | 428 |
Goals, with shots on goal in grey.
Scoring
Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.
- P1 15:34ARIKlas DahlbeckAssists: Max Domi, Martin Hanzal · Snap, 0.04 xG1–0
- P2 10:06NYRChris KreiderAssists: Mats Zuccarello, Marc Staal · Tip-in, 0.12 xG1–1
- P3 2:35NYRKevin HayesGWGAssists: J.T. Miller · Backhand, 0.07 xG1–2
- P3 6:24NYRKeith YandlePPAssists: Mats Zuccarello, Derek Stepan · Deflected, 0.18 xG1–3
- P3 19:17NYRRick NashENUnassisted · Wrist, 0.77 xG1–4
Penalties (6)
- P1 16:11NYRRick Nash: Interference goalkeeper2 min
- P2 7:15NYRKeith Yandle: Tripping2 min
- P2 10:34ARITobias Rieder: Tripping2 min
- P2 15:01ARINicklas Grossmann: Interference2 min
- P3 6:16ARIMichael Stone: High sticking2 min · PPG
- P3 8:47NYRMarc Staal: Hooking2 min
Replay
Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.
20:00
P1
- P1 20:00Hayes won the faceoff against Richardson
- Goal
- Shot
- Miss
- Block
- Hit
- Takeaway
- Giveaway
- Faceoff
- Penalty
The numbers
Team totals, side by side.
Line combinations that worked
Model-basedEach team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.
Arizona Coyotes
Forward lines
- bestHanzal – Duclair – Domi11:30
xG 0.40–0.27 (60%)attempts 9–4goals 1–0
- Doan – Vermette – Boedker6:12
xG 0.08–0.01 (88%)attempts 4–6goals 0–0
- Doan – Gordon – Martinook2:04
xG 0.07–0.02 (77%)attempts 3–2goals 0–0
- Richardson – Downie – Rieder9:21
xG 0.27–0.24 (53%)attempts 3–10goals 0–0
Defence pairs
- bestStone – Ekman-Larsson15:45
xG 0.73–0.26 (74%)attempts 15–12goals 0–0
- Michalek – Dahlbeck7:46
xG 0.16–0.03 (83%)attempts 5–5goals 1–0
- Grossmann – Murphy13:12
xG 0.46–0.60 (43%)attempts 8–14goals 0–1
New York Rangers
Forward lines
- bestBrassard – Kreider – Fast11:06
xG 0.70–0.35 (66%)attempts 13–7goals 0–0
- Lindberg – Hayes – Miller9:41
xG 0.39–0.21 (64%)attempts 7–8goals 1–1
- Nash – Stepan – Zuccarello11:08
xG 0.44–0.32 (58%)attempts 13–5goals 0–0
- Stoll – Moore – Stalberg7:43
xG 0.14–0.38 (27%)attempts 3–10goals 0–0
Defence pairs
- bestKlein – McDonagh13:14
xG 0.80–0.58 (58%)attempts 9–9goals 0–0
- Boyle – Yandle2:26
xG 0.09–0.00 (100%)attempts 4–0goals 0–0
- Boyle – Staal13:10
xG 0.34–0.35 (49%)attempts 12–12goals 1–0
How the game flowed
Model-basedChance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.
Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.
Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute
Win probability
Model-basedHow each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.
NYR's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line NYR is favoured, below it ARI. Dots are goals.
Did the better team win?
Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.
Based on shot quality alone, New York Rangers win this game 52% of the time.
Simulated goal difference (NYR − ARI), 10,000 replays
The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).