Skip to content
Ice Lab

Sun, Nov 1, 2015·Pepsi Center, Denver

San Jose Sharks 4, Colorado Avalanche 3

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, San Jose Sharks win this game 68% of the time.

COL winsSJS wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
SJS11211327432
COL1101719326

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 5:17COLJarome IginlaPPAssists: Tyson Barrie, Carl Soderberg · Wrist, 0.06 xG0–1
  2. P1 7:00SJSJoel WardAssists: Patrick Marleau · Wrist, 0.31 xG1–1
  3. P2 12:03SJSBrent BurnsSHAssists: Barclay Goodrow, Marc-Edouard Vlasic · Slap, 0.02 xG2–1
  4. P2 12:24COLFrancois BeaucheminPPAssists: Gabriel Landeskog, Matt Duchene · Wrist, 0.23 xG2–2
  5. P3 18:21SJSBrent BurnsAssists: Patrick Marleau, Tomas Hertl · Wrist, 0.05 xG3–2
  6. P3 18:40SJSJoe PavelskiENGWGUnassisted · Wrist, 0.74 xG4–2
  7. P3 18:55COLCody McLeodAssists: Tyson Barrie, Nick Holden · Wrist, 0.14 xG4–3
Penalties (8)
  1. P1 3:43SJSTomas Hertl: Tripping2 min · PPG
  2. P1 9:52COLCody McLeod: Fighting5 min
  3. P1 9:52SJSMike Brown: Fighting5 min
  4. P1 10:57SJSPaul Martin: High sticking2 min
  5. P1 11:48COLCarl Soderberg: Interference2 min
  6. P1 12:28SJSChris Tierney: Slashing2 min
  7. P2 11:02SJSMatt Nieto: Hooking2 min · PPG
  8. P2 17:15COLSemyon Varlamov: Tripping2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

SJS00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0COL
47% to win54% to win
← SJS attackCOL attack →
  1. P1 20:00MacKinnon won the faceoff against Hertl
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

SJSCOL
32Shots on goal26
2.9Expected goals2.0
43Shot attempts41
33Faceoffs won29
1Power plays4
13Penalty minutes9
10Hits22
8Blocked shots5
0Giveaways1
7Takeaways4

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

San Jose Sharks

Forward lines

  1. bestMarleau – Ward – Hertl14:04

    xG 1.02–0.61 (63%)attempts 18–9goals 2–0

  2. Thornton – Pavelski – Donskoi10:53

    xG 0.19–0.06 (75%)attempts 6–4goals 0–0

  3. Brown – Lerg – Goodrow5:18

    xG 0.10–0.04 (69%)attempts 1–3goals 0–0

  4. Wingels – Nieto – Tierney8:57

    xG 0.08–0.33 (19%)attempts 5–8goals 0–1

Defence pairs

  1. bestVlasic – Braun16:25

    xG 0.50–0.26 (66%)attempts 6–8goals 1–1

  2. Dillon – Tennyson8:55

    xG 0.09–0.13 (42%)attempts 5–4goals 0–0

  3. Martin – Burns18:24

    xG 0.55–0.69 (44%)attempts 15–15goals 0–0

Colorado Avalanche

Forward lines

  1. bestSoderberg – Duchene – Landeskog14:53

    xG 0.81–0.28 (74%)attempts 14–9goals 0–0

  2. Mitchell – Comeau – McLeod7:37

    xG 0.10–0.07 (61%)attempts 3–4goals 0–0

  3. Skille – Grigorenko – Everberg2:18

    xG 0.00–0.00attempts 0–0goals 0–0

  4. Mitchell – Comeau – Skille2:05

    xG 0.00–0.00attempts 1–0goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. Stuart – Guenin12:42

    xG 0.12–0.14 (46%)attempts 6–5goals 0–0

  2. Holden – Barrie18:46

    xG 1.00–1.13 (47%)attempts 17–20goals 1–2

  3. Beauchemin – Johnson16:38

    xG 0.13–0.47 (22%)attempts 6–11goals 0–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

COL 2.0 xGSJS 2.9 xG
0123P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

COLSJS

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

COL's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line COL is favoured, below it SJS. Dots are goals.

Excitement 65/100 · #415 of 1230 this seasonSwing 1.77 · 7 goals in reachComeback index 31% (winner's lowest chance)
SJS 100%5050%50COL 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +44 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, San Jose Sharks win this game 68% of the time.

COL winsSJS wins

Simulated goal difference (COL − SJS), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).