Skip to content
Ice Lab

Mon, Dec 7, 2015·Rogers Arena, Vancouver

Buffalo Sabres 2, Vancouver Canucks 5

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Vancouver Canucks win this game 67% of the time.

VAN winsBUF wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
BUF19012113234
VAN211210110531

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 6:48BUFBrian GiontaAssists: Jamie McGinn · Tip-in, 0.10 xG1–0
  2. P1 8:08VANRadim VrbataAssists: Chris Higgins, Ben Hutton · Wrist, 0.20 xG1–1
  3. P1 16:42VANRadim VrbataAssists: Dan Hamhuis, Daniel Sedin · Deflected, 0.05 xG1–2
  4. P2 4:34VANBrandon PrustGWGAssists: Derek Dorsett, Adam Cracknell · Wrist, 0.12 xG1–3
  5. P2 17:18VANHenrik SedinPPAssists: Alexander Edler, Daniel Sedin · Deflected, 0.23 xG1–4
  6. P3 1:51BUFSam ReinhartAssists: Ryan O'Reilly · Snap, 0.09 xG2–4
  7. P3 14:28VANRadim VrbataAssists: Adam Cracknell, Brandon Prust · Wrist, 0.05 xG2–5
Penalties (8)
  1. P1 11:22BUFNicolas Deslauriers: Too many men on the ice2 min
  2. P1 18:10BUFZach Bogosian: Slashing2 min
  3. P2 9:14VANDaniel Sedin: Tripping2 min
  4. P2 11:49BUFEvander Kane: Roughing2 min
  5. P2 16:13BUFNicolas Deslauriers: Interference2 min · PPG
  6. P2 16:14VANAlexandre Burrows: High sticking double minor4 min
  7. P2 16:59BUFEvander Kane: Hooking2 min
  8. P3 10:05BUFMike Weber: Slashing2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

BUF00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0VAN
47% to win54% to win
← BUF attackVAN attack →
  1. P1 20:00O'Reilly won the faceoff against Sedin
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

BUFVAN
34Shots on goal31
1.8Expected goals2.7
52Shot attempts57
30Faceoffs won29
3Power plays6
12Penalty minutes6
33Hits24
13Blocked shots10
7Giveaways8
3Takeaways4

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Buffalo Sabres

Forward lines

  1. bestO'Reilly – Kane – Reinhart7:25

    xG 0.38–0.09 (81%)attempts 17–3goals 0–0

  2. Moulson – Larsson – Girgensons7:29

    xG 0.51–0.26 (66%)attempts 6–6goals 0–0

  3. McGinn – O'Reilly – Reinhart3:47

    xG 0.23–0.00 (100%)attempts 5–0goals 1–0

  4. Gionta – Kane – Eichel6:01

    xG 0.12–0.20 (39%)attempts 7–4goals 0–1

Defence pairs

  1. bestFranson – Weber13:08

    xG 0.60–0.33 (65%)attempts 12–13goals 1–1

  2. Gorges – Ristolainen12:25

    xG 0.28–0.15 (65%)attempts 13–9goals 0–1

  3. Colaiacovo – Bogosian14:58

    xG 0.72–0.98 (42%)attempts 18–16goals 1–2

Vancouver Canucks

Forward lines

  1. bestVrbata – Higgins – McCann6:14

    xG 0.42–0.14 (75%)attempts 7–6goals 1–0

  2. Prust – Cracknell – Dorsett10:42

    xG 0.41–0.21 (66%)attempts 12–5goals 1–0

  3. Burrows – Baertschi – Horvat7:19

    xG 0.20–0.18 (52%)attempts 5–8goals 0–0

  4. Sedin – Sedin – Hansen8:23

    xG 0.21–0.38 (35%)attempts 4–11goals 0–1

Defence pairs

  1. bestEdler – Tanev14:20

    xG 0.26–0.12 (69%)attempts 10–8goals 0–0

  2. Hamhuis – Biega12:58

    xG 0.57–0.53 (52%)attempts 14–18goals 3–1

  3. Edler – Bartkowski2:03

    xG 0.06–0.31 (17%)attempts 1–5goals 0–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

VAN 2.7 xGBUF 1.8 xG
-0.500.511.522.53P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

VANBUF

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

VAN's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line VAN is favoured, below it BUF. Dots are goals.

Excitement 52/100 · #564 of 1230 this seasonSwing 1.11 · 7 goals in reachComeback index 33% (winner's lowest chance)
BUF 100%5050%50VAN 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +20 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Vancouver Canucks win this game 67% of the time.

VAN winsBUF wins

Simulated goal difference (VAN − BUF), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).