Fri, Dec 18, 2015·PNC Arena, Raleigh
Florida Panthers 2, Carolina Hurricanes 0
Three stars
Expected result
Based on shot quality alone, Florida Panthers win this game 55% of the time.
By period
Goals and shots on goal in each period.
| Team | P1 | P2 | P3 | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FLA | 05 | 07 | 26 | 218 |
| CAR | 06 | 09 | 09 | 024 |
Goals, with shots on goal in grey.
Scoring
Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.
- P3 4:09FLAWillie MitchellGWGAssists: Jonathan Huberdeau, Aleksander Barkov · Snap, 0.15 xG1–0
- P3 19:39FLAReilly SmithENUnassisted · Snap, 0.55 xG2–0
Penalties (5)
- P1 12:57CARJay McClement: Holding2 min
- P2 11:30FLAVincent Trocheck: Closing hand on puck2 min
- P2 15:51CARElias Lindholm: Holding2 min
- P3 6:00FLACorban Knight: Hooking2 min
- P3 13:57CARRon Hainsey: Hooking2 min
Replay
Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.
20:00
P1
- P1 20:00Barkov won the faceoff against Staal
- Goal
- Shot
- Miss
- Block
- Hit
- Takeaway
- Giveaway
- Faceoff
- Penalty
The numbers
Team totals, side by side.
Line combinations that worked
Model-basedEach team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.
Florida Panthers
Forward lines
- bestJokinen – Smith – Trocheck11:22
xG 0.37–0.21 (64%)attempts 13–10goals 0–0
- Pirri – Knight – Shaw10:55
xG 0.30–0.16 (65%)attempts 5–9goals 0–0
- Brickley – Howden – Grimaldi5:53
xG 0.21–0.25 (45%)attempts 5–3goals 0–0
- Jagr – Huberdeau – Barkov13:29
xG 0.33–0.69 (33%)attempts 7–16goals 1–0
Defence pairs
- bestMitchell – Campbell14:52
xG 0.57–0.21 (73%)attempts 14–13goals 1–0
- Kulikov – Ekblad15:05
xG 0.39–0.16 (71%)attempts 8–7goals 0–0
- Olsen – Gudbranson12:54
xG 0.26–0.47 (36%)attempts 8–11goals 0–0
Carolina Hurricanes
Forward lines
- bestStaal – Nestrasil – Nordstrom9:24
xG 0.59–0.04 (93%)attempts 13–2goals 0–0
- Skinner – Rask – Di Giuseppe10:31
xG 0.41–0.33 (56%)attempts 7–13goals 0–0
- Staal – Versteeg – Lindholm12:27
xG 0.50–0.51 (49%)attempts 14–10goals 0–1
- McClement – Terry – Malone4:18
xG 0.02–0.21 (7%)attempts 3–3goals 0–0
Defence pairs
- bestHainsey – Faulk13:24
xG 0.62–0.34 (64%)attempts 16–7goals 0–1
- Liles – Pesce15:58
xG 0.35–0.38 (48%)attempts 10–12goals 0–0
- Slavin – Hanifin11:51
xG 0.34–0.44 (43%)attempts 8–11goals 0–0
How the game flowed
Model-basedChance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.
Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.
Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute
Win probability
Model-basedHow each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.
CAR's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line CAR is favoured, below it FLA. Dots are goals.
Did the better team win?
Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.
Based on shot quality alone, Florida Panthers win this game 55% of the time.
Simulated goal difference (CAR − FLA), 10,000 replays
The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).