Skip to content
Ice Lab

Mon, Dec 28, 2015·Amalie Arena, Tampa

Montréal Canadiens 4, Tampa Bay Lightning 3 (SO)

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Tampa Bay Lightning win this game 71% of the time.

TBL winsMTL wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3OTSOTotal
MTL11418110022434
TBL011116211011339

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 15:58MTLTomas PlekanecAssists: P.K. Subban, Sven Andrighetto · Wrist, 0.13 xG1–0
  2. P2 5:40TBLNikita KucherovPPAssists: Valtteri Filppula, Anton Stralman · Wrist, 0.21 xG1–1
  3. P2 9:57MTLAlex GalchenyukAssists: Andrei Markov, Jeff Petry · Snap, 0.04 xG2–1
  4. P3 13:21TBLJason GarrisonAssists: Alex Killorn · Wrist, 0.11 xG2–2
  5. P3 13:42TBLRyan CallahanAssists: Valtteri Filppula, Andrej Sustr · Wrist, 0.04 xG2–3
  6. P3 14:14MTLDale WeiseAssists: David Desharnais, Max Pacioretty · Wrist, 0.09 xG3–3

Shootout

  1. 1. TBL Jonathan Marchessault stopped
  2. 2. MTL Alex Galchenyuk stopped
  3. 3. TBL Valtteri Filppula scored
  4. 4. MTL Brian Flynn scored
  5. 5. TBL Nikita Kucherov stopped
  6. 6. MTL Max Pacioretty scored
Penalties (4)
  1. P1 2:03TBLAlex Killorn: Hooking2 min
  2. P1 0:00MTLTomas Plekanec: Delaying game puck over glass2 min
  3. P2 5:15MTLAndrei Markov: Hooking2 min · PPG
  4. P3 15:32MTLTorrey Mitchell: Hooking2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

MTL00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0TBL
47% to win54% to win
← MTL attackTBL attack →
  1. P1 20:00Filppula won the faceoff against Desharnais
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

MTLTBL
34Shots on goal39
1.8Expected goals3.0
51Shot attempts68
37Faceoffs won38
1Power plays3
6Penalty minutes2
24Hits30
16Blocked shots5
10Giveaways10
6Takeaways5

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Montréal Canadiens

Forward lines

  1. Eller – Galchenyuk – Carr10:08

    xG 0.24–0.20 (54%)attempts 10–6goals 1–1

  2. Mitchell – Byron – Flynn8:37

    xG 0.13–0.21 (39%)attempts 3–6goals 0–0

  3. Desharnais – Pacioretty – Weise13:06

    xG 0.39–0.48 (45%)attempts 9–18goals 1–0

  4. Plekanec – Fleischmann – Andrighetto14:39

    xG 0.36–0.76 (32%)attempts 12–13goals 1–1

Defence pairs

  1. Pateryn – Barberio12:25

    xG 0.36–0.54 (40%)attempts 8–12goals 0–1

  2. Markov – Petry16:58

    xG 0.51–0.92 (36%)attempts 20–20goals 2–0

  3. Subban – Beaulieu20:49

    xG 0.35–0.76 (32%)attempts 10–20goals 1–1

Tampa Bay Lightning

Forward lines

  1. bestStamkos – Kucherov – Namestnikov13:36

    xG 0.85–0.28 (76%)attempts 20–8goals 0–1

  2. Killorn – Johnson – Brown11:08

    xG 0.73–0.15 (83%)attempts 13–10goals 1–0

  3. Boyle – Condra – Paquette2:17

    xG 0.17–0.01 (95%)attempts 5–1goals 0–0

  4. Filppula – Callahan – Brown3:25

    xG 0.11–0.00 (100%)attempts 3–0goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestGarrison – Sustr13:40

    xG 0.67–0.12 (85%)attempts 21–6goals 0–0

  2. Stralman – Hedman14:35

    xG 0.51–0.28 (65%)attempts 16–12goals 0–1

  3. Coburn – Garrison2:14

    xG 0.14–0.05 (73%)attempts 1–2goals 0–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

TBL 3.0 xGMTL 1.8 xG
0123P1P2P3OTEndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

TBLMTL

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

TBL's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line TBL is favoured, below it MTL. Dots are goals.

Excitement 94/100 · #66 of 1230 this seasonSwing 2.82 · 6 goals in reachComeback index 12% (winner's lowest chance)
MTL 100%5050%50TBL 100%P1P2P3OTEndBiggest swing +38 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Tampa Bay Lightning win this game 71% of the time.

TBL winsMTL wins

Simulated goal difference (TBL − MTL), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).