Skip to content
Ice Lab

Wed, Dec 30, 2015·CONSOL Energy Center, Pittsburgh

Toronto Maple Leafs 3, Pittsburgh Penguins 2 (SO)

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Pittsburgh Penguins win this game 50% of the time.

PIT winsTOR wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3OTSOTotal
TOR112110011032336
PIT17120010041241

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 3:51TORDion PhaneufAssists: Nazem Kadri, Leo Komarov · Slap, 0.02 xG1–0
  2. P1 5:25PITChris KunitzPPAssists: Sidney Crosby, Evgeni Malkin · Tip-in, 0.17 xG1–1
  3. P2 1:13TORJake GardinerAssists: James van Riemsdyk, Tyler Bozak · Tip-in, 0.09 xG2–1
  4. P2 4:45PITSidney CrosbyAssists: Brian Dumoulin · Snap, 0.06 xG2–2

Shootout

  1. 1. PIT David Perron scored
  2. 2. TOR Peter Holland scored
  3. 3. PIT Sidney Crosby stopped
  4. 4. TOR PA Parenteau scored
  5. 5. PIT Kris Letang stopped
Penalties (13)
  1. P1 4:23TORPeter Holland: Hooking2 min · PPG
  2. P1 12:13PITEvgeni Malkin: Hooking2 min
  3. P1 15:11TORLeo Komarov: Boarding2 min
  4. P1 15:11TORJake Gardiner: Roughing2 min
  5. P1 15:11PITKris Letang: Roughing2 min
  6. P1 19:14PITSidney Crosby: Roughing2 min
  7. P1 19:14TORDion Phaneuf: Roughing2 min
  8. P2 4:06TORDion Phaneuf: Roughing2 min
  9. P2 4:06PITEvgeni Malkin: Slashing2 min
  10. P2 9:00TORRoman Polak: Hooking2 min
  11. P3 9:43TORMartin Marincin: Holding2 min
  12. P3 12:29PITPatric Hornqvist: Hooking2 min
  13. P3 18:20TORTyler Bozak: Tripping2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

TOR00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0PIT
47% to win54% to win
← TOR attackPIT attack →
  1. P1 20:00Bozak won the faceoff against Crosby
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

TORPIT
36Shots on goal41
3.4Expected goals3.4
59Shot attempts69
37Faceoffs won30
2Power plays5
16Penalty minutes10
32Hits29
18Blocked shots15
7Giveaways5
6Takeaways7

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Toronto Maple Leafs

Forward lines

  1. bestKomarov – Grabner – Kadri10:06

    xG 0.71–0.31 (69%)attempts 10–7goals 1–0

  2. Lupul – Winnik – Arcobello6:35

    xG 0.20–0.07 (74%)attempts 8–4goals 0–0

  3. Parenteau – van Riemsdyk – Bozak10:43

    xG 0.22–0.38 (37%)attempts 4–9goals 0–0

  4. Boyes – Matthias – Holland7:32

    xG 0.10–0.33 (23%)attempts 7–12goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestPhaneuf – Gardiner13:05

    xG 0.69–0.21 (77%)attempts 15–6goals 1–0

  2. Polak – Marincin5:45

    xG 0.09–0.11 (46%)attempts 7–6goals 0–0

  3. Polak – Rielly2:49

    xG 0.10–0.12 (46%)attempts 3–4goals 0–0

Pittsburgh Penguins

Forward lines

  1. bestMalkin – Hornqvist – Perron9:25

    xG 0.52–0.20 (72%)attempts 10–4goals 0–0

  2. Kunitz – Crosby – Sheary8:40

    xG 0.31–0.38 (45%)attempts 12–7goals 0–0

  3. Kunitz – Crosby – Kessel2:06

    xG 0.00–0.08 (0%)attempts 0–1goals 0–0

  4. Cullen – Fehr – Porter8:50

    xG 0.18–0.34 (34%)attempts 7–7goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestLovejoy – Dumoulin13:56

    xG 0.63–0.15 (81%)attempts 15–7goals 0–1

  2. Daley – Cole10:55

    xG 0.44–0.20 (69%)attempts 11–6goals 0–0

  3. Letang – Maatta13:11

    xG 0.21–1.26 (14%)attempts 11–18goals 0–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

PIT 3.4 xGTOR 3.4 xG
01234P1P2P3OTEndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

PITTOR

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

PIT's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line PIT is favoured, below it TOR. Dots are goals.

Excitement 86/100 · #167 of 1230 this seasonSwing 2.34 · 4 goals in reachComeback index 32% (winner's lowest chance)
TOR 100%5050%50PIT 100%P1P2P3OTEndBiggest swing +23 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Pittsburgh Penguins win this game 50% of the time.

PIT winsTOR wins

Simulated goal difference (PIT − TOR), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).