Mon, Jan 4, 2016·Rogers Arena, Vancouver
Arizona Coyotes 3, Vancouver Canucks 2
Expected result
Based on shot quality alone, Arizona Coyotes win this game 51% of the time.
By period
Goals and shots on goal in each period.
| Team | P1 | P2 | P3 | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ARI | 010 | 212 | 17 | 329 |
| VAN | 012 | 115 | 110 | 237 |
Goals, with shots on goal in grey.
Scoring
Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.
- P2 6:55ARIShane DoanAssists: Connor Murphy, Brad Richardson · Wrist, 0.24 xG1–0
- P2 13:41VANBo HorvatPPUnassisted · Wrist, 0.36 xG1–1
- P2 14:00ARILaurent DauphinAssists: Tobias Rieder, Louis Domingue · Wrist, 0.24 xG2–1
- P3 1:13ARIShane DoanPPGWGAssists: Tobias Rieder, Antoine Vermette · Wrist, 0.35 xG3–1
- P3 4:41VANDaniel SedinAssists: Henrik Sedin, Chris Tanev · Wrist, 0.07 xG3–2
Penalties (4)
- P1 11:51VANDerek Dorsett: Tripping2 min
- P2 12:24ARIMax Domi: Interference goalkeeper2 min · PPG
- P2 18:35ARILaurent Dauphin: Interference2 min
- P2 0:00VANBo Horvat: Hooking2 min · PPG
Replay
Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.
20:00
P1
- P1 20:00Sedin won the faceoff against Richardson
- Goal
- Shot
- Miss
- Block
- Hit
- Takeaway
- Giveaway
- Faceoff
- Penalty
The numbers
Team totals, side by side.
Line combinations that worked
Model-basedEach team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.
Arizona Coyotes
Forward lines
- bestVermette – Boedker – Domi11:54
xG 0.48–0.20 (71%)attempts 12–7goals 0–0
- Doan – Richardson – Martinook14:44
xG 0.52–0.35 (60%)attempts 12–13goals 1–0
- Rieder – Duclair – Dauphin8:09
xG 0.44–0.32 (58%)attempts 6–11goals 1–0
- Gordon – Chipchura – Tikhonov9:57
xG 0.12–0.28 (30%)attempts 6–9goals 0–1
Defence pairs
- bestEkman-Larsson – Murphy19:16
xG 1.08–0.57 (65%)attempts 17–18goals 2–1
- Elliott – Dahlbeck11:38
xG 0.19–0.25 (43%)attempts 9–9goals 0–0
- Grossmann – Stone16:51
xG 0.32–0.43 (43%)attempts 11–18goals 0–0
Vancouver Canucks
Forward lines
- bestDorsett – Kenins – McCann10:28
xG 0.56–0.05 (92%)attempts 15–3goals 0–0
- Sedin – Sedin – Hansen10:59
xG 0.29–0.13 (69%)attempts 10–9goals 1–0
- Burrows – Cracknell – Vey8:31
xG 0.16–0.42 (28%)attempts 6–10goals 0–0
- Vrbata – Higgins – Horvat11:46
xG 0.19–0.57 (25%)attempts 8–10goals 0–1
Defence pairs
- bestBiega – Bartkowski17:47
xG 0.40–0.19 (67%)attempts 20–9goals 0–0
- Edler – Tanev15:48
xG 0.47–0.64 (42%)attempts 15–15goals 1–1
- Weber – Hutton15:41
xG 0.47–0.70 (40%)attempts 14–14goals 0–1
How the game flowed
Model-basedChance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.
Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.
Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute
Win probability
Model-basedHow each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.
VAN's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line VAN is favoured, below it ARI. Dots are goals.
Did the better team win?
Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.
Based on shot quality alone, Arizona Coyotes win this game 51% of the time.
Simulated goal difference (VAN − ARI), 10,000 replays
The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).