Skip to content
Ice Lab

Fri, Jan 15, 2016·First Niagara Center, Buffalo

Boston Bruins 4, Buffalo Sabres 1

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Boston Bruins win this game 52% of the time.

BUF winsBOS wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
BOS0919313431
BUF11001608134

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 14:37BUFDavid LegwandUnassisted · Wrist, 0.14 xG0–1
  2. P2 1:01BOSMatt BeleskeyAssists: Ryan Spooner, Loui Eriksson · Wrist, 0.16 xG1–1
  3. P3 0:29BOSZdeno CharaGWGAssists: Ryan Spooner, Matt Beleskey · Wrist, 0.01 xG2–1
  4. P3 10:53BOSRyan SpoonerAssists: Loui Eriksson, Kevan Miller · Wrist, 0.01 xG3–1
  5. P3 18:51BOSBrett ConnollyENAssists: Brad Marchand · Wrap-around, 0.78 xG4–1
Penalties (8)
  1. P1 15:01BUFJohan Larsson: Fighting5 min
  2. P1 15:01BOSMax Talbot: Fighting5 min
  3. P1 17:13BUFCody Franson: Hooking2 min
  4. P2 2:30BOSMax Talbot: Holding2 min
  5. P2 4:59BOSLandon Ferraro: Slashing2 min
  6. P2 7:12BOSZdeno Chara: Delaying game puck over glass2 min
  7. P2 12:15BUFMike Weber: Hooking2 min
  8. P3 15:43BOSRyan Spooner: Holding2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

BOS00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0BUF
47% to win54% to win
← BOS attackBUF attack →
  1. P1 20:00Bergeron won the faceoff against O'Reilly
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

BOSBUF
31Shots on goal34
2.3Expected goals2.2
47Shot attempts55
30Faceoffs won29
2Power plays4
13Penalty minutes9
25Hits24
8Blocked shots8
6Giveaways4
1Takeaways7

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Boston Bruins

Forward lines

  1. bestBergeron – Marchand – Connolly11:15

    xG 0.48–0.10 (82%)attempts 16–5goals 0–0

  2. Eriksson – Beleskey – Spooner9:23

    xG 0.43–0.09 (82%)attempts 10–6goals 3–0

  3. Talbot – Rinaldo – Ferraro9:34

    xG 0.18–0.37 (34%)attempts 6–8goals 0–0

  4. Hayes – Vatrano – Kemppainen8:29

    xG 0.09–0.45 (17%)attempts 4–6goals 0–1

Defence pairs

  1. bestMiller – Krug7:30

    xG 0.44–0.10 (82%)attempts 7–3goals 1–0

  2. Chara – Miller2:56

    xG 0.16–0.00 (100%)attempts 5–0goals 0–0

  3. Seidenberg – Trotman2:09

    xG 0.14–0.02 (89%)attempts 3–1goals 0–0

Buffalo Sabres

Forward lines

  1. bestLegwand – Moulson – Schaller3:48

    xG 0.25–0.04 (85%)attempts 2–3goals 1–0

  2. Moulson – Reinhart – Eichel4:46

    xG 0.10–0.02 (81%)attempts 4–2goals 0–0

  3. Girgensons – Reinhart – Eichel2:42

    xG 0.00–0.10 (0%)attempts 0–1goals 0–0

  4. Gionta – Foligno – Larsson8:50

    xG 0.31–0.45 (41%)attempts 10–9goals 0–1

Defence pairs

  1. bestBogosian – Ristolainen2:06

    xG 0.34–0.05 (87%)attempts 5–1goals 0–0

  2. Franson – Weber12:46

    xG 0.34–0.09 (79%)attempts 8–6goals 0–0

  3. Bogosian – McCabe14:12

    xG 0.23–0.54 (30%)attempts 11–10goals 0–2

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

BUF 2.2 xGBOS 2.3 xG
00.511.522.5P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

BUFBOS

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

BUF's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line BUF is favoured, below it BOS. Dots are goals.

Excitement 38/100 · #769 of 1230 this seasonSwing 1.30 · 5 goals in reachComeback index 25% (winner's lowest chance)
BOS 100%5050%50BUF 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +28 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Boston Bruins win this game 52% of the time.

BUF winsBOS wins

Simulated goal difference (BUF − BOS), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).