Skip to content
Ice Lab

Sun, Jan 24, 2016·PNC Arena, Raleigh

Calgary Flames 2, Carolina Hurricanes 5

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Calgary Flames win this game 54% of the time.

CAR winsCGY wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
CGY08112115235
CAR214112210536

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 2:26CARVictor RaskUnassisted · Wrist, 0.03 xG0–1
  2. P1 17:27CARElias LindholmUnassisted · Snap, 0.02 xG0–2
  3. P2 3:50CARKris VersteegGWGAssists: Eric Staal, Ron Hainsey · Snap, 0.16 xG0–3
  4. P2 11:15CGYJiri HudlerAssists: Mark Giordano, Joe Colborne · Backhand, 0.16 xG1–3
  5. P3 5:01CGYJoe ColborneAssists: Markus Granlund, TJ Brodie · Snap, 0.12 xG2–3
  6. P3 11:13CARKris VersteegPPAssists: Jeff Skinner, Jordan Staal · Backhand, 0.20 xG2–4
  7. P3 11:45CARJoakim NordstromAssists: Jordan Staal, Andrej Nestrasil · Snap, 0.20 xG2–5
Penalties (11)
  1. P1 3:17CARBrad Malone: Cross checking2 min
  2. P1 8:56CARBrad Malone: Hooking2 min
  3. P1 17:27CGYKris Russell: Penalty shot holding on breakaway0 min
  4. P1 19:16CGYJiri Hudler: Holding2 min
  5. P2 7:30CARMichal Jordan: Hooking2 min
  6. P2 15:50CARKris Versteeg: High sticking2 min
  7. P2 17:39CGYMichael Frolik: Slashing2 min
  8. P3 1:48CARMichal Jordan: Interference2 min
  9. P3 9:35CGYDavid Jones: Interference2 min · PPG
  10. P3 14:51CGYDennis Wideman: Hooking2 min
  11. P3 17:07CGYMatt Stajan: Holding2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

CGY00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0CAR
47% to win54% to win
← CGY attackCAR attack →
  1. P1 20:00Backlund won the faceoff against Staal
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

CGYCAR
35Shots on goal36
4.2Expected goals3.9
68Shot attempts68
29Faceoffs won38
5Power plays5
10Penalty minutes10
18Hits10
22Blocked shots15
8Giveaways11
17Takeaways19

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Calgary Flames

Forward lines

  1. bestHudler – Colborne – Granlund4:16

    xG 0.77–0.27 (74%)attempts 7–8goals 1–2

  2. Stajan – Bouma – Jooris8:18

    xG 1.07–0.62 (63%)attempts 13–12goals 0–0

  3. Jones – Gaudreau – Monahan6:06

    xG 0.63–0.31 (67%)attempts 7–9goals 0–0

  4. Frolik – Backlund – Bennett11:24

    xG 0.63–0.46 (58%)attempts 20–8goals 0–1

Defence pairs

  1. bestGiordano – Brodie9:58

    xG 1.55–0.51 (75%)attempts 18–12goals 1–2

  2. Russell – Brodie3:04

    xG 0.48–0.19 (71%)attempts 9–6goals 1–0

  3. Smid – Hamilton4:13

    xG 0.17–0.00 (100%)attempts 6–1goals 0–0

Carolina Hurricanes

Forward lines

  1. Staal – Versteeg – Di Giuseppe10:22

    xG 0.48–0.49 (50%)attempts 9–13goals 1–1

  2. Staal – Nestrasil – Nordstrom9:20

    xG 0.85–0.92 (48%)attempts 15–12goals 1–0

  3. McClement – Terry – Malone5:33

    xG 0.19–0.52 (27%)attempts 6–6goals 0–0

  4. Skinner – Rask – Lindholm7:10

    xG 0.14–0.94 (13%)attempts 9–18goals 1–1

Defence pairs

  1. bestHainsey – Slavin11:17

    xG 1.52–1.08 (58%)attempts 24–16goals 2–1

  2. Hainsey – Hanifin2:08

    xG 0.07–0.15 (30%)attempts 3–2goals 0–0

  3. Jordan – Hanifin10:02

    xG 0.51–0.72 (42%)attempts 14–10goals 2–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

CAR 3.9 xGCGY 4.2 xG
01234P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

CARCGY

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

CAR's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line CAR is favoured, below it CGY. Dots are goals.

Excitement 69/100 · #371 of 1230 this seasonSwing 1.06 · 7 goals in reach · 2-goal lead cutComeback index 53% (winner's lowest chance)
CGY 100%5050%50CAR 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +14 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Calgary Flames win this game 54% of the time.

CAR winsCGY wins

Simulated goal difference (CAR − CGY), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).