Skip to content
Ice Lab

Tue, Jan 26, 2016·SAP Center at San Jose, San Jose

Colorado Avalanche 1, San Jose Sharks 6

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, San Jose Sharks win this game 88% of the time.

SJS winsCOL wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
COL0605111122
SJS2921124624

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 6:19SJSMelker KarlssonAssists: Brent Burns, Chris Tierney · Deflected, 0.07 xG0–1
  2. P1 10:13SJSTomas HertlGWGAssists: Marc-Edouard Vlasic, Joe Thornton · Backhand, 0.23 xG0–2
  3. P2 15:28SJSJoe PavelskiPPAssists: Joe Thornton, Patrick Marleau · Wrist, 0.17 xG0–3
  4. P2 16:18SJSJoel WardPPUnassisted · Slap, 0.60 xG0–4
  5. P3 8:21SJSPaul MartinENAssists: Brent Burns · Wrist, 0.58 xG0–5
  6. P3 11:35COLNathan MacKinnonPPAssists: Alex Tanguay, Erik Johnson · Slap, 0.07 xG1–5
  7. P3 19:03SJSDylan DeMeloPPAssists: Tomas Hertl · Wrist, 0.01 xG1–6
Penalties (14)
  1. P1 19:54COLCody McLeod: Tripping2 min
  2. P2 6:21SJSBrenden Dillon: Delaying game puck over glass2 min
  3. P2 13:43COLAndreas Martinsen: Boarding2 min · PPG
  4. P2 14:35COLFrancois Beauchemin: Tripping2 min · PPG
  5. P2 18:35COLAndreas Martinsen: Delaying game puck over glass2 min
  6. P2 19:11SJSLogan Couture: Slashing2 min
  7. P3 1:33SJSBrent Burns: Delaying game puck over glass2 min
  8. P3 4:48SJSJustin Braun: Interference2 min
  9. P3 7:13SJSTomas Hertl: Roughing2 min
  10. P3 7:13COLErik Johnson: Roughing2 min
  11. P3 10:28SJSTomas Hertl: Hooking2 min · PPG
  12. P3 18:51COLJohn Mitchell: Boarding2 min · PPG
  13. P3 18:51COLCody McLeod: Misconduct10 min
  14. P3 19:03COLJohn Mitchell: Misconduct10 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

COL00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0SJS
47% to win54% to win
← COL attackSJS attack →
  1. P1 20:00Soderberg won the faceoff against Marleau
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

COLSJS
22Shots on goal24
1.7Expected goals4.3
57Shot attempts46
38Faceoffs won25
5Power plays5
32Penalty minutes12
36Hits12
14Blocked shots22
6Giveaways20
7Takeaways8

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Colorado Avalanche

Forward lines

  1. bestIginla – Wagner – Martinsen11:06

    xG 0.49–0.22 (69%)attempts 16–6goals 0–1

  2. Mitchell – McLeod – Skille9:18

    xG 0.20–0.04 (84%)attempts 5–4goals 0–0

  3. Comeau – Soderberg – Landeskog7:55

    xG 0.12–0.25 (33%)attempts 4–9goals 0–0

  4. Tanguay – Duchene – MacKinnon8:26

    xG 0.03–0.77 (4%)attempts 6–11goals 0–1

Defence pairs

  1. bestHolden – Barrie13:12

    xG 0.65–0.23 (74%)attempts 12–11goals 0–0

  2. Beauchemin – Barrie2:31

    xG 0.07–0.10 (42%)attempts 2–1goals 0–0

  3. Redmond – Bigras10:57

    xG 0.13–0.28 (32%)attempts 7–6goals 0–0

San Jose Sharks

Forward lines

  1. bestCouture – Wingels – Donskoi8:46

    xG 0.73–0.14 (84%)attempts 6–5goals 0–0

  2. Thornton – Pavelski – Hertl9:46

    xG 0.64–0.30 (68%)attempts 9–14goals 1–0

  3. Zubrus – Tierney – Karlsson9:06

    xG 0.11–0.10 (54%)attempts 7–8goals 1–0

  4. Marleau – Ward – Nieto8:24

    xG 0.25–0.35 (42%)attempts 7–5goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestVlasic – Braun11:05

    xG 1.33–0.16 (89%)attempts 13–9goals 1–0

  2. Martin – Burns14:40

    xG 0.32–0.55 (37%)attempts 10–14goals 1–0

  3. Dillon – DeMelo12:29

    xG 0.08–0.33 (20%)attempts 7–8goals 0–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

SJS 4.3 xGCOL 1.7 xG
012345P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

SJSCOL

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

SJS's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line SJS is favoured, below it COL. Dots are goals.

Excitement 13/100 · #1066 of 1230 this seasonSwing 0.53 · 4 goals in reachComeback index 53% (winner's lowest chance)
COL 100%5050%50SJS 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +15 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, San Jose Sharks win this game 88% of the time.

SJS winsCOL wins

Simulated goal difference (SJS − COL), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).