Skip to content
Ice Lab

Thu, Feb 4, 2016·Gila River Arena, Glendale

Chicago Blackhawks 5, Arizona Coyotes 4 (OT)

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Chicago Blackhawks win this game 69% of the time.

ARI winsCHI wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3OTTotal
CHI0531611514540
ARI172111703428

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 17:12ARIOliver Ekman-LarssonPPAssists: Martin Hanzal, Max Domi · Wrist, 0.07 xG0–1
  2. P2 2:53CHIMarian HossaUnassisted · Wrist, 0.15 xG1–1
  3. P2 4:00CHIJonathan ToewsSHAssists: Marian Hossa, Trevor van Riemsdyk · Wrist, 0.08 xG2–1
  4. P2 12:26ARIMikkel BoedkerPPAssists: Oliver Ekman-Larsson, Michael Stone · Wrist, 0.13 xG2–2
  5. P2 12:35ARIJordan MartinookAssists: Brad Richardson, Viktor Tikhonov · Wrist, 0.12 xG2–3
  6. P2 14:10CHIPatrick KaneAssists: Artemi Panarin · Wrist, 0.05 xG3–3
  7. P3 7:18CHIMichal RozsivalAssists: Artem Anisimov, Artemi Panarin · Wrist, 0.11 xG4–3
  8. P3 11:30ARIShane DoanAssists: Jordan Martinook, Oliver Ekman-Larsson · Wrap-around, 0.03 xG4–4
  9. OT 4:31CHIJonathan ToewsGWGAssists: Brent Seabrook, Artemi Panarin · Wrist, 0.23 xG5–4
Penalties (13)
  1. P1 3:57ARIBrad Richardson: Slashing2 min
  2. P1 15:40CHIRichard Panik: Bench2 min · PPG
  3. P1 18:23ARIViktor Tikhonov: Hooking2 min
  4. P2 3:33CHIDuncan Keith: Holding2 min
  5. P2 9:26ARIOliver Ekman-Larsson: Tripping2 min
  6. P2 10:45CHIAndrew Shaw: Charging2 min · PPG
  7. P2 10:45CHIAndrew Shaw: Roughing2 min
  8. P2 10:45ARIZbynek Michalek: Roughing2 min
  9. P2 15:16CHIPhillip Danault: Tripping2 min
  10. P2 17:40ARIMartin Hanzal: Holding2 min
  11. P3 6:45CHIMarian Hossa: Slashing2 min
  12. P3 6:45ARIShane Doan: Cross checking2 min
  13. OT 4:31ARIOliver Ekman-Larsson: Game misconduct10 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

CHI00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0ARI
47% to win54% to win
← CHI attackARI attack →
  1. P1 20:00Richardson won the faceoff against Toews
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

CHIARI
40Shots on goal28
2.7Expected goals1.7
69Shot attempts46
25Faceoffs won39
4Power plays4
12Penalty minutes22
15Hits25
9Blocked shots11
3Giveaways5
8Takeaways8

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Chicago Blackhawks

Forward lines

  1. bestDesjardins – Danault – Teravainen7:54

    xG 0.53–0.04 (93%)attempts 13–2goals 0–0

  2. Anisimov – Kane – Panarin10:35

    xG 0.44–0.09 (83%)attempts 16–7goals 1–0

  3. Mashinter – Panik – Rasmussen5:07

    xG 0.14–0.00 (100%)attempts 3–0goals 0–0

  4. Hossa – Toews – Shaw10:19

    xG 0.41–0.32 (56%)attempts 15–7goals 1–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestKeith – Hjalmarsson16:33

    xG 0.59–0.20 (75%)attempts 20–8goals 1–1

  2. Seabrook – Gustafsson6:25

    xG 0.51–0.25 (67%)attempts 11–5goals 1–1

  3. Seabrook – van Riemsdyk3:29

    xG 0.18–0.02 (92%)attempts 7–1goals 0–0

Arizona Coyotes

Forward lines

  1. Doan – Richardson – Martinook11:18

    xG 0.20–0.32 (38%)attempts 8–12goals 1–0

  2. Vermette – Boedker – Rieder10:12

    xG 0.10–0.38 (21%)attempts 7–13goals 0–0

  3. Gordon – Chipchura – Tikhonov5:40

    xG 0.03–0.40 (7%)attempts 1–8goals 0–1

  4. Hanzal – Duclair – Domi8:24

    xG 0.07–0.47 (12%)attempts 4–14goals 0–1

Defence pairs

  1. Ekman-Larsson – Murphy13:15

    xG 0.39–0.46 (46%)attempts 9–15goals 1–1

  2. Stone – Connauton16:11

    xG 0.26–0.57 (31%)attempts 10–21goals 1–1

  3. Michalek – Dahlbeck11:35

    xG 0.06–0.64 (9%)attempts 4–16goals 0–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

ARI 1.7 xGCHI 2.7 xG
-0.500.511.522.53P1P2P3OTEndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

ARICHI

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

ARI's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line ARI is favoured, below it CHI. Dots are goals.

Excitement 98/100 · #27 of 1230 this seasonSwing 3.06 · 9 goals in reachComeback index 24% (winner's lowest chance)
CHI 100%5050%50ARI 100%P1P2P3OTEndBiggest swing +35 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Chicago Blackhawks win this game 69% of the time.

ARI winsCHI wins

Simulated goal difference (ARI − CHI), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).