Skip to content
Ice Lab

Fri, Feb 5, 2016·Honda Center, Anaheim

Arizona Coyotes 2, Anaheim Ducks 5

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Anaheim Ducks win this game 68% of the time.

ANA winsARI wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
ARI1611108225
ANA014213314541

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 1:34ARITobias RiederAssists: Shane Doan · Wrist, 0.12 xG1–0
  2. P2 4:00ANAHampus LindholmAssists: Rickard Rakell, Patrick Maroon · Snap, 0.04 xG1–1
  3. P2 5:06ANAMike SantorelliUnassisted · Backhand, 0.11 xG1–2
  4. P2 14:55ARIShane DoanPPAssists: Antoine Vermette, Oliver Ekman-Larsson · Backhand, 0.33 xG2–2
  5. P3 2:07ANACorey PerryGWGAssists: Rickard Rakell, Patrick Maroon · Wrist, 0.13 xG2–3
  6. P3 3:48ANAAndrew CoglianoAssists: Kevin Bieksa, Ryan Kesler · Tip-in, 0.14 xG2–4
  7. P3 16:25ANAPatrick MaroonPPAssists: Ryan Kesler, Sami Vatanen · Tip-in, 0.17 xG2–5
Penalties (12)
  1. P1 2:33ARIMichael Stone: Holding2 min
  2. P1 10:38ANAChris Stewart: Roughing2 min
  3. P1 14:25ANAPatrick Maroon: Roughing2 min
  4. P1 16:35ARIMikkel Boedker: Roughing2 min
  5. P2 0:26ARIConnor Murphy: Holding2 min
  6. P2 1:57ARIAntoine Vermette: Hooking2 min
  7. P2 9:56ANACam Fowler: Hooking2 min
  8. P2 13:38ANASami Vatanen: Tripping2 min · PPG
  9. P2 16:34ANAKevin Bieksa: Roughing2 min
  10. P3 5:41ARIBrad Richardson: Tripping2 min
  11. P3 7:59ARIMartin Hanzal: Cross checking2 min
  12. P3 14:54ARIMartin Hanzal: Slashing2 min · PPG

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

ARI00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0ANA
47% to win54% to win
← ARI attackANA attack →
  1. P1 20:00Kesler won the faceoff against Hanzal
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

ARIANA
25Shots on goal41
2.2Expected goals3.3
51Shot attempts74
32Faceoffs won34
5Power plays7
14Penalty minutes10
25Hits31
19Blocked shots14
12Giveaways10
4Takeaways8

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Arizona Coyotes

Forward lines

  1. bestDoan – Richardson – Martinook9:18

    xG 0.41–0.11 (79%)attempts 9–6goals 0–0

  2. Hanzal – Boedker – Domi7:28

    xG 0.27–0.20 (58%)attempts 6–9goals 0–0

  3. Vermette – Rieder – Duclair5:20

    xG 0.10–0.11 (47%)attempts 8–3goals 0–1

  4. Hanzal – Duclair – Domi3:26

    xG 0.06–0.18 (25%)attempts 3–7goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. Michalek – Tinordi11:00

    xG 0.40–0.43 (48%)attempts 5–15goals 1–1

  2. Stone – Connauton10:04

    xG 0.21–0.49 (30%)attempts 11–11goals 0–0

  3. Ekman-Larsson – Murphy12:56

    xG 0.28–0.69 (29%)attempts 12–18goals 0–2

Anaheim Ducks

Forward lines

  1. bestThompson – Santorelli – Garbutt10:04

    xG 0.86–0.18 (83%)attempts 19–6goals 1–0

  2. Getzlaf – Stewart – Perron6:39

    xG 0.13–0.05 (72%)attempts 8–5goals 0–0

  3. Perry – Maroon – Rakell7:57

    xG 0.30–0.30 (50%)attempts 8–9goals 1–1

  4. Kesler – Cogliano – Silfverberg9:09

    xG 0.34–0.39 (47%)attempts 10–10goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestManson – Lindholm11:20

    xG 0.82–0.43 (66%)attempts 19–7goals 1–1

  2. Despres – Vatanen9:44

    xG 0.36–0.17 (68%)attempts 11–13goals 1–0

  3. Bieksa – Fowler8:44

    xG 0.27–0.17 (62%)attempts 10–5goals 0–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

ANA 3.3 xGARI 2.2 xG
0123P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

ANAARI

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

ANA's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line ANA is favoured, below it ARI. Dots are goals.

Excitement 71/100 · #335 of 1230 this seasonSwing 1.85 · 7 goals in reachComeback index 29% (winner's lowest chance)
ARI 100%5050%50ANA 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +28 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Anaheim Ducks win this game 68% of the time.

ANA winsARI wins

Simulated goal difference (ANA − ARI), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).