Sat, Feb 13, 2016·SAP Center at San Jose, San Jose
Arizona Coyotes 1, San Jose Sharks 4
Expected result
Based on shot quality alone, San Jose Sharks win this game 83% of the time.
By period
Goals and shots on goal in each period.
| Team | P1 | P2 | P3 | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ARI | 010 | 112 | 01 | 123 |
| SJS | 29 | 013 | 26 | 428 |
Goals, with shots on goal in grey.
Scoring
Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.
- P1 2:59SJSDainius ZubrusAssists: Matt Tennyson, Logan Couture · Tip-in, 0.07 xG0–1
- P1 18:56SJSChris TierneyGWGAssists: Brent Burns, Melker Karlsson · Tip-in, 0.16 xG0–2
- P2 1:58ARIMartin HanzalAssists: Tobias Rieder · Wrist, 0.04 xG1–2
- P3 10:58SJSTomas HertlAssists: Brent Burns, Paul Martin · Deflected, 0.06 xG1–3
- P3 18:41SJSJoonas DonskoiENAssists: Marc-Edouard Vlasic, Joe Thornton · Wrist, 0.73 xG1–4
Penalties (10)
- P1 9:32SJSDainius Zubrus: Interference2 min
- P1 15:56ARIMartin Hanzal: Boarding2 min
- P1 19:25SJSMarc-Edouard Vlasic: Holding2 min
- P2 5:43ARIAntoine Vermette: Hooking2 min
- P2 7:52ARIShane Doan: Roughing2 min
- P2 7:52SJSTomas Hertl: Roughing2 min
- P2 8:21ARIJordan Martinook: Holding2 min
- P3 7:58SJSTommy Wingels: Holding2 min
- P3 12:16ARIKevin Connauton: High sticking2 min
- P3 17:25ARIMichael Stone: Illegal check to head2 min · PPG
Replay
Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.
20:00
P1
- P1 20:00Couture won the faceoff against Vermette
- Goal
- Shot
- Miss
- Block
- Hit
- Takeaway
- Giveaway
- Faceoff
- Penalty
The numbers
Team totals, side by side.
Line combinations that worked
Model-basedEach team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.
Arizona Coyotes
Forward lines
- bestHanzal – Rieder – Duclair4:18
xG 0.15–0.03 (83%)attempts 5–3goals 1–0
- Doan – Richardson – Rieder6:09
xG 0.22–0.16 (57%)attempts 8–7goals 0–0
- Chipchura – Boedker – Gaudet2:21
xG 0.00–0.00attempts 1–1goals 0–0
- Doan – Richardson – Domi2:36
xG 0.00–0.19 (0%)attempts 1–3goals 0–0
Defence pairs
- Michalek – Dahlbeck8:00
xG 0.15–0.14 (53%)attempts 3–7goals 1–0
- Stone – Connauton4:39
xG 0.02–0.03 (42%)attempts 3–2goals 0–0
- Michalek – Connauton4:03
xG 0.12–0.23 (33%)attempts 4–5goals 0–0
San Jose Sharks
Forward lines
- bestCouture – Wingels – Donskoi6:59
xG 0.32–0.03 (90%)attempts 9–2goals 0–0
- Thornton – Pavelski – Hertl11:54
xG 0.45–0.26 (64%)attempts 13–11goals 1–0
- Zubrus – Tierney – Karlsson8:06
xG 0.31–0.14 (68%)attempts 7–7goals 1–0
- Marleau – Ward – Nieto9:11
xG 0.29–0.21 (58%)attempts 7–8goals 0–0
Defence pairs
- bestVlasic – Braun13:51
xG 0.69–0.25 (73%)attempts 17–11goals 0–0
- Burns – Vlasic2:42
xG 0.23–0.04 (85%)attempts 5–2goals 1–0
- DeMelo – Tennyson8:48
xG 0.26–0.09 (75%)attempts 10–3goals 1–0
How the game flowed
Model-basedChance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.
Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.
Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute
Win probability
Model-basedHow each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.
SJS's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line SJS is favoured, below it ARI. Dots are goals.
Did the better team win?
Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.
Based on shot quality alone, San Jose Sharks win this game 83% of the time.
Simulated goal difference (SJS − ARI), 10,000 replays
The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).