Skip to content
Ice Lab

Mon, Feb 15, 2016·Scotiabank Saddledome, Calgary

Anaheim Ducks 6, Calgary Flames 4

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Anaheim Ducks win this game 56% of the time.

CGY winsANA wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
ANA2143915628
CGY311113013437

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 5:56CGYJohnny GaudreauPPAssists: Sean Monahan, Jiri Hudler · Backhand, 0.36 xG0–1
  2. P1 9:59ANAHampus LindholmPPUnassisted · Slap, 0.10 xG1–1
  3. P1 11:22CGYDougie HamiltonPPAssists: Sean Monahan · Slap, 0.03 xG1–2
  4. P1 13:48ANAMike SantorelliAssists: Cam Fowler, Kevin Bieksa · Wrist, 0.04 xG2–2
  5. P1 17:05CGYJiri HudlerAssists: Johnny Gaudreau, Dougie Hamilton · Wrist, 0.03 xG2–3
  6. P2 2:15ANACorey PerryPPAssists: Cam Fowler, Ryan Getzlaf · Wrist, 0.40 xG3–3
  7. P2 3:20ANASami VatanenPPAssists: David Perron, Cam Fowler · Wrist, 0.24 xG4–3
  8. P2 12:18ANARickard RakellGWGAssists: Corey Perry, Simon Despres · Wrist, 0.04 xG5–3
  9. P2 19:53CGYJiri HudlerAssists: Johnny Gaudreau, Sean Monahan · Backhand, 0.14 xG5–4
  10. P3 0:51ANAMike SantorelliAssists: Ryan Kesler, Josh Manson · Wrist, 0.38 xG6–4
Penalties (10)
  1. P1 2:48ANAPatrick Maroon: Too many men on the ice2 min
  2. P1 5:09ANARyan Getzlaf: Tripping2 min · PPG
  3. P1 8:43CGYMicheal Ferland: Tripping2 min · PPG
  4. P1 11:19ANADavid Perron: Holding the stick2 min · PPG
  5. P1 19:13ANARyan Kesler: Cross checking2 min
  6. P1 19:13CGYJiri Hudler: Cross checking2 min
  7. P1 0:00ANACorey Perry: Tripping2 min
  8. P2 1:21CGYJohnny Gaudreau: Tripping2 min · PPG
  9. P2 3:09CGYJakub Nakladal: Holding2 min · PPG
  10. P2 7:52ANAKevin Bieksa: Hooking2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

ANA00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0CGY
47% to win54% to win
← ANA attackCGY attack →
  1. P1 20:00Backlund won the faceoff against Kesler
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

ANACGY
28Shots on goal37
3.2Expected goals2.9
51Shot attempts57
30Faceoffs won27
3Power plays5
12Penalty minutes8
17Hits17
13Blocked shots12
14Giveaways6
7Takeaways9

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Anaheim Ducks

Forward lines

  1. bestKesler – Cogliano – Silfverberg11:59

    xG 0.88–0.76 (54%)attempts 14–16goals 0–2

  2. Getzlaf – Santorelli – Perron7:55

    xG 0.12–0.16 (44%)attempts 4–4goals 0–0

  3. Thompson – Maroon – Garbutt8:32

    xG 0.05–0.17 (24%)attempts 5–3goals 0–0

  4. Perry – Rakell – Ritchie10:30

    xG 0.24–0.39 (38%)attempts 6–9goals 1–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestManson – Lindholm16:20

    xG 0.93–0.49 (66%)attempts 11–9goals 1–0

  2. Despres – Vatanen11:35

    xG 0.56–0.41 (58%)attempts 12–10goals 1–2

  3. Bieksa – Fowler15:50

    xG 0.24–0.64 (28%)attempts 11–15goals 1–0

Calgary Flames

Forward lines

  1. bestFrolik – Backlund – Bennett11:57

    xG 0.49–0.03 (94%)attempts 10–5goals 0–0

  2. Colborne – Ferland – Granlund7:41

    xG 0.19–0.05 (79%)attempts 7–5goals 0–0

  3. Hudler – Gaudreau – Monahan12:32

    xG 0.58–0.46 (56%)attempts 12–15goals 2–0

  4. Bouma – Bollig – Jooris7:28

    xG 0.02–0.67 (2%)attempts 1–7goals 0–2

Defence pairs

  1. bestGiordano – Brodie17:38

    xG 0.41–0.27 (60%)attempts 12–10goals 0–1

  2. Engelland – Smid2:36

    xG 0.17–0.06 (72%)attempts 1–3goals 0–1

  3. Smid – Nakladal6:25

    xG 0.02–0.05 (30%)attempts 3–5goals 0–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

CGY 2.9 xGANA 3.2 xG
0123P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

CGYANA

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

CGY's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line CGY is favoured, below it ANA. Dots are goals.

Excitement 91/100 · #102 of 1230 this seasonSwing 2.10 · 10 goals in reachComeback index 25% (winner's lowest chance)
ANA 100%5050%50CGY 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +23 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Anaheim Ducks win this game 56% of the time.

CGY winsANA wins

Simulated goal difference (CGY − ANA), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).