Skip to content
Ice Lab

Thu, Feb 18, 2016·Gila River Arena, Glendale

Dallas Stars 3, Arizona Coyotes 6

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Arizona Coyotes win this game 57% of the time.

ARI winsDAL wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
DAL111111117339
ARI01831638642

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 9:38DALTyler SeguinAssists: Patrick Sharp, Jamie Benn · Wrist, 0.05 xG1–0
  2. P2 3:33ARIMax DomiAssists: Anthony Duclair, Martin Hanzal · Backhand, 0.13 xG1–1
  3. P2 13:02DALJamie BennPPAssists: Jason Spezza, Tyler Seguin · Wrist, 0.08 xG2–1
  4. P2 13:53ARIMichael StoneAssists: Max Domi, Anthony Duclair · Slap, 0.03 xG2–2
  5. P2 18:26ARIMax DomiAssists: Anthony Duclair, Martin Hanzal · Wrist, 0.28 xG2–3
  6. P3 7:20ARIMartin HanzalPPGWGAssists: Oliver Ekman-Larsson · Backhand, 0.41 xG2–4
  7. P3 8:33DALAles HemskyAssists: Johnny Oduya, Jason Spezza · Wrist, 0.33 xG3–4
  8. P3 9:14ARITyler GaudetAssists: Kyle Chipchura, Klas Dahlbeck · Wrist, 0.18 xG3–5
  9. P3 18:14ARIAntoine VermetteENAssists: Mikkel Boedker, Zbynek Michalek · Wrist, 0.69 xG3–6
Penalties (7)
  1. P1 14:59DALAlex Goligoski: Hooking2 min
  2. P2 7:49ARIMartin Hanzal: High sticking double minor4 min
  3. P2 8:34DALTyler Seguin: Tripping2 min
  4. P2 9:20DALJason Demers: Hooking2 min
  5. P2 12:07ARIKyle Chipchura: Hooking2 min · PPG
  6. P3 7:15DALJason Demers: Tripping2 min · PPG
  7. P3 14:34ARIMartin Hanzal: Tripping2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

DAL00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0ARI
47% to win54% to win
← DAL attackARI attack →
  1. P1 20:00Seguin won the faceoff against Richardson
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

DALARI
39Shots on goal42
3.6Expected goals4.1
70Shot attempts64
41Faceoffs won33
4Power plays3
8Penalty minutes8
9Hits26
9Blocked shots16
3Giveaways1
2Takeaways6

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Dallas Stars

Forward lines

  1. bestSpezza – Hemsky – Janmark4:19

    xG 0.74–0.22 (77%)attempts 8–3goals 1–0

  2. Fiddler – Eaves – Sceviour4:48

    xG 0.48–0.07 (88%)attempts 10–3goals 0–0

  3. Eaves – Roussel – Eakin3:23

    xG 0.35–0.00 (100%)attempts 8–0goals 0–0

  4. Fiddler – Sceviour – Nichushkin2:31

    xG 0.18–0.08 (68%)attempts 4–1goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestOduya – Benn5:18

    xG 0.69–0.06 (93%)attempts 10–3goals 1–0

  2. Demers – Nemeth4:40

    xG 0.47–0.17 (74%)attempts 12–1goals 0–0

  3. Oduya – Demers8:27

    xG 0.36–0.31 (54%)attempts 7–6goals 0–2

Arizona Coyotes

Forward lines

  1. bestHanzal – Duclair – Domi12:20

    xG 1.30–0.56 (70%)attempts 23–11goals 3–0

  2. Vermette – Boedker – Martinook5:04

    xG 0.40–0.33 (54%)attempts 6–5goals 0–0

  3. Doan – Richardson – Rieder5:55

    xG 0.14–0.28 (33%)attempts 5–7goals 0–1

  4. Chipchura – Tikhonov – Gaudet9:25

    xG 0.39–0.64 (38%)attempts 6–15goals 1–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestEkman-Larsson – Murphy16:31

    xG 1.61–0.58 (74%)attempts 25–14goals 3–1

  2. Stone – Connauton15:34

    xG 0.42–1.28 (25%)attempts 14–18goals 0–1

  3. Michalek – Dahlbeck14:43

    xG 0.06–1.10 (5%)attempts 4–22goals 0–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

ARI 4.1 xGDAL 3.6 xG
01234P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

ARIDAL

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

ARI's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line ARI is favoured, below it DAL. Dots are goals.

Excitement 84/100 · #193 of 1230 this seasonSwing 1.94 · 9 goals in reachComeback index 26% (winner's lowest chance)
DAL 100%5050%50ARI 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +27 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Arizona Coyotes win this game 57% of the time.

ARI winsDAL wins

Simulated goal difference (ARI − DAL), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).